On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Accountor's Report
> Date of last report: never
Should I bother with a claim of error, since the Accountor has
previously issued a report?
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 9:47 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Accountor's Report
>> Date of last report: never
>> Date of this report: now
>>
>> Trumpets:
>>
>> The letter I: 1
>
> That's the type of report I'd be happy with
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Accountor's Report
> Date of last report: never
> Date of this report: now
>
> Trumpets:
>
> The letter I: 1
That's the type of report I'd be happy with doing on a regular basis.
I suggest that we stop making ourselves recordkeep
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 10:21 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I CFJ on the statement:
> {{
> ais523's claim of identity in each of the messages sent to
> agora-business in which e claims that e has 100 points is incorrect,
> because neither e nor ehird has 100 points.
> }}
The claim that e
On 5/24/08, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> DISCLAIMER:
You know, this will no longer work for the next month, so remove the
disclaimer or make a more interesting one ;)
Murphy wrote:
> ais523, you have enough support (more than enough, if Duality
> works) to appeal your own judgement of CFJ 1935. The deadline
> for doing so is June 3.
Yes, I know. I was going to wait a while to give the fix-
OVERLOOKED proposal more time to pass, but complete the appeal
before th
ehird, you're about one day overdue to judge CFJ 1933. pikhq,
ditto for CFJs 1934 and 1948, plus 1949-50 (closely related to
1948) are due about one day from now.
There are two pending assignments (1951 and 1974) and no
standing judges. I'll probably do another rotation on May 26.
comex, you ha
7 matches
Mail list logo
