DIS: Re: BUS: If there isn't any interest...

On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 6:18 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Without 3 objections, I intend to make Agoran Twister cease to be a contest. Speaking of which, would anybody be interested in taking over from me the Fantasy Rules Contest? -root

Re: DIS: Proto-proposal: Flash proposals

> Oh, and in that case I revise my minimum index suggestion to 3. Why shouldn't there be power 1 flash proposals?

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Bank of Agora Report

Wooble wrote: > On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 8:28 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Proto-report, anyone should feel free to publish this (I'll be offline >> > intermittently for the rest of the weekend). Someone should

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Land Takeover Pledge

On Fri, 2 May 2008, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> The question is, does an entity defined by an entity defined (...) by an >> entity defined by the Rules reduce to an entity defined by the rules? >> >> I think the Rules are silen

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 1921 Judgment

On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 11:13 PM, Buddha Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Keep in mind the "As in 4" part of the CFJ, which was "if the phrasing > is informal..." (...) > This CFJ, on the other hand, concerns private communications along the lines > of: > > {{From Bob: Hey Alice, I'll show yo

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Bank of Agora Report

On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 8:28 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Proto-report, anyone should feel free to publish this (I'll be offline > > intermittently for the rest of the weekend). Someone should also > > suggest