On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 7:22 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Appellant comex's arguments consisted of "See root's message in a-d,
> among other things."
I was on vacation so I didn't have time to write up a long argument.
Basically, what root said-- the judgement was based on R2019 saying
Proto-Contest: Enigma
1) The name of this public contract is Enigma.
2) The purpose of this contract is to be a contest that encourages
asking and answering puzzles of moderate difficulty.
3) Any player CAN become a member of this contract by announcement.
4) The contestmaster of this contr
Zefram wrote:
>> 5457 O1 1Murphy Proposal reporting requirements
> AGAINST*10 (there's a good reason why proposal distributions lacking
> those data are valid albeit illegal)
They'd still be valid if no one points out the omission within a week
after distribution.
root wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [Would anyone like to take over as contestmaster of the FRContest,
>> or alternatively to be contestmaster of this one?]
>
> I could take over the Fantasy Rules Contest. If I have to pay
> attention to it, ma
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Would anyone like to take over as contestmaster of the FRContest,
> or alternatively to be contestmaster of this one?]
I could take over the Fantasy Rules Contest. If I have to pay
attention to it, maybe I'll find more time
Ed Murphy wrote:
>6) For the purpose of this contest, a puzzle is a body of text clearly
> identified as such, accompanied by its correct answer, and sent
> privately to the contestmaster by a contestant who has not
> previously submitted a puzzle during the same week.
There's an obvious sca
Ben Caplan wrote:
>As to flexibility and zero sum, I would just Murphy's change to (c) as follows:
> (c) The sum of all legally specified Partisanship values
> for all specified players is equal to the sum of the
> Partisanship values that those players had immedi
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> A Takeover Proposal is any proposal clearly labeled as such.
Labeled by anyone? Nice way to flatten the voting limits.
> (b) The number of Players in this set is at least one
> third, and no greater than two thirds, the number of
> active
8 matches
Mail list logo
