Re: DIS: [Scorekeepor] Late

2008-02-11 Thread Josiah Worcester
On 17:57 Mon 11 Feb , comex wrote: > On Feb 11, 2008 5:49 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The scorekeepor's report will be a bit late; I have spent most of this > > weekend rebuilding my root partition, so have been unable to actually > > access the mailing lists. > > Dereg

Re: DIS: [Scorekeepor] Late

2008-02-11 Thread comex
On Feb 11, 2008 5:49 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The scorekeepor's report will be a bit late; I have spent most of this > weekend rebuilding my root partition, so have been unable to actually > access the mailing lists. Deregister!

DIS: [Scorekeepor] Late

2008-02-11 Thread Josiah Worcester
The scorekeepor's report will be a bit late; I have spent most of this weekend rebuilding my root partition, so have been unable to actually access the mailing lists. You may now take this opportunity to curse at Gentoo. Sincerely, The Honorable Scorekeepor, pikhq

Re: DIS: Proto: nomic definition

2008-02-11 Thread Roger Hicks
On Feb 11, 2008 9:12 AM, Ben Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 09 February 2008 7:23 I wrote: > > On Friday 08 February 2008 12:57 Zefram wrote: > > > In that case I suggest that you clarify by expressing it as "protectorate > > > that is also a player". However, I don't think the de

Re: DIS: Proto: nomic definition

2008-02-11 Thread comex
On 2/11/08, Ben Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > s[p|c]ammable [pc]

Re: DIS: Proto: nomic definition

2008-02-11 Thread Ben Caplan
On Saturday 09 February 2008 7:23 I wrote: > On Friday 08 February 2008 12:57 Zefram wrote: > > In that case I suggest that you clarify by expressing it as "protectorate > > that is also a player". However, I don't think the definition is useful. > > I like the notion; it provides an interesting p