On Friday 23 November 2007 20:05:27 Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2007 6:03 PM, Levi Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I initiate an Agoran Decision to resolve the holder of the Scorekeeper
> > office.
> >
> > The valid options are WOOBLE, PIKHQ, COMEX and FOOKIEMYARTUG.
> >
> > The eligible
On Friday 23 November 2007 17:58:31 Josiah Worcester wrote:
> '104.' The Speaker for the first game shall be Michael Norrish.
Agora's Child may do nothing.
On Friday 23 November 2007 17:57:57 comex wrote:
> If everyone's VLOP is to be 4, why not just:
>
> Proto: Repeal Ordinary Proposals
> {{{
> Repeal Rule 2156 (Voting on Ordinary Proposals).
> Amend Rule 106 by removing the text:
> "A Proposal with an Adoption Index of less than 2 is Ordinary. All
If everyone's VLOP is to be 4, why not just:
Proto: Repeal Ordinary Proposals
{{{
Repeal Rule 2156 (Voting on Ordinary Proposals).
Amend Rule 106 by removing the text:
"A Proposal with an Adoption Index of less than 2 is Ordinary. All
other Proposals are Democratic."
Amend Rule 1607 by replacing:
On Friday 23 November 2007 17:14:48 Ed Murphy wrote:
> I nominate pikhq and Wooble for Ambassador.
>
> Levi, any luck with the reports for IADoP and/or Herald?
>
>
I consent to be Ambassador.
I SUPPORT myself as Ambassador.
The AFO SUPPORTS myself as Ambassador.
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
> While I agree, do we want to have some method of changing VVLOPs, or shall we
> just set them all to 4?
I wonder if the issue is high-velocity micropayments in general. It was
chips for cards, and microunits for currencies, which eventually tipped
t
On Nov 23, 2007 3:42 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is clear that the era of partnerships and contracts has degenerated
> into an era of petty abuse. So it has run its course. Sad, even by Agoran
> standards. Anyone (eris, root?) want to make the move now to get rid of
> them, a
On Friday 23 November 2007 17:11:14 Ed Murphy wrote:
> Goethe wrote:
>
> > People outside the conspiracy: can we be done with currencies again
> > for a while? Zefram, care to do the honors of proposing?
>
> We might want to just repeal VCs and Marks, while leaving the Asset
> infrastructure in
On Nov 23, 2007 6:53 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
> > I cause the AFO to celebrate inflation.
>
> People outside the conspiracy: can we be done with currencies again
> for a while? Zefram, care to do the honors of proposing?
>
> -Goet
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007, Levi Stephen wrote:
> Ed Murphy wrote:
>> I nominate pikhq and Wooble for Ambassador.
>>
>> Levi, any luck with the reports for IADoP and/or Herald?
>>
> Working on IADoP report and elections etc., now.
>
> Goethe is now Herald I believe.
I am the herald. I'm sorry I've be
Ed Murphy wrote:
I nominate pikhq and Wooble for Ambassador.
Levi, any luck with the reports for IADoP and/or Herald?
Working on IADoP report and elections etc., now.
Goethe is now Herald I believe.
Levi
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Ed Murphy wrote:
> We might want to just repeal VCs and Marks, while leaving the Asset
> infrastructure in place (for contracts wishing to use them).
I agree, it's a good infrastructure to have (I'd always liked the
private currencies in that older system). -Goethe
Goethe wrote:
People outside the conspiracy: can we be done with currencies again
for a while? Zefram, care to do the honors of proposing?
We might want to just repeal VCs and Marks, while leaving the Asset
infrastructure in place (for contracts wishing to use them).
Ed Murphy wrote:
pikhq wrote:
On Friday 23 November 2007 15:41:55 Ed Murphy wrote:
The AFO retracts all CFJs that it called within the past 24 hours.
Fortunately, the marks are still in existence. :)
Unfortunately, I still have to process all the actions in comex's
long message. :(
Wou
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
> I cause the AFO to celebrate inflation.
People outside the conspiracy: can we be done with currencies again
for a while? Zefram, care to do the honors of proposing?
-Goethe
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
> The most recent abuse by the AFO would work just as well with comex and I in
> agreement.
I said marks were ill-thought out at the time, it's part of the
clean-up. -Goethe
On Friday 23 November 2007 16:17:17 comex wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2007 6:04 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I transfer 409 Blue Marks to BobTHJ.
> > I transfer 409 Blue Marks to Eris.
> > I transfer 409 Blue Marks to Goethe.
> > I transfer 409 Blue Marks to OscarMeyr.
> > I transfer 409 Bl
On Nov 23, 2007 5:41 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The AFO retracts all CFJs that it called within the past 24 hours.
>
Forgot that was possible or I would have done that myself, thanks.
On Nov 23, 2007 6:04 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I transfer 409 Blue Marks to BobTHJ.
> I transfer 409 Blue Marks to Eris.
> I transfer 409 Blue Marks to Goethe.
> I transfer 409 Blue Marks to OscarMeyr.
> I transfer 409 Blue Marks to Peekee.
> I transfer 409 Blue Marks to root.
> I
On Friday 23 November 2007 16:04:30 Ed Murphy wrote:
> I transfer 409 Blue Marks to BobTHJ.
> I transfer 409 Blue Marks to Eris.
> I transfer 409 Blue Marks to Goethe.
> I transfer 409 Blue Marks to OscarMeyr.
> I transfer 409 Blue Marks to Peekee.
> I transfer 409 Blue Marks to root.
> I transfer
On Friday 23 November 2007 15:52:34 Ed Murphy wrote:
> comex wrote:
>
> > The AFO transfers 98 blue marks to comex.
>
> This was successful.
>
> > The AFO transfers 98 blue marks to comex.
> > The AFO transfers 98 blue marks to pikhq.
> > The AFO transfers 98 blue marks to Murphy.
> > The AFO tr
On Friday 23 November 2007 15:49:42 Ed Murphy wrote:
> pikhq wrote:
>
> > On Friday 23 November 2007 15:41:55 Ed Murphy wrote:
>
> >> The AFO retracts all CFJs that it called within the past 24 hours.
> >
> > Fortunately, the marks are still in existence. :)
>
> Unfortunately, I still have to p
comex wrote:
The AFO transfers 98 blue marks to comex.
This was successful.
The AFO transfers 98 blue marks to comex.
The AFO transfers 98 blue marks to pikhq.
The AFO transfers 98 blue marks to Murphy.
The AFO transfers 98 blue marks to Levi.
These were not; the AFO had no marks left to t
pikhq wrote:
On Friday 23 November 2007 15:41:55 Ed Murphy wrote:
The AFO retracts all CFJs that it called within the past 24 hours.
Fortunately, the marks are still in existence. :)
Unfortunately, I still have to process all the actions in comex's
long message. :(
On Friday 23 November 2007 15:41:55 Ed Murphy wrote:
> The AFO retracts all CFJs that it called within the past 24 hours.
>
Fortunately, the marks are still in existence. :)
On Friday 23 November 2007 14:42:47 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> It is clear that the era of partnerships and contracts has degenerated
> into an era of petty abuse. So it has run its course. Sad, even by Agoran
> standards. Anyone (eris, root?) want to make the move now to get rid of
> them, and sec
On Nov 23, 2007 3:20 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The AFO calls for judgement on the following:
> "Transfers 98 marks" meant "Transfers 98 blue marks" when the AFO did so while
> only holding 98 blue marks.
You can stop making repeat CFJs now. 120 is enough.
On Friday 23 November 2007 13:14:58 comex wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2007 3:00 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The AFO calls for judgement on the following:
> > - There are now elephants over there
>
> The AFO transfers 98 blue marks to comex.
> The AFO transfers 98 blue marks to come
On Friday 23 November 2007 11:31:00 Ed Murphy wrote:
> pikhq wrote:
>
> > [ Any problems with this, rules-wise? Sure hope not. ]
>
> Afraid so. The contract would need Power >= 2 to alter VC holdings
> (Rules 1688 and 2126).
>
> I tried having the Agoran Credit Union work around this by definin
pikhq wrote:
[ Any problems with this, rules-wise? Sure hope not. ]
Afraid so. The contract would need Power >= 2 to alter VC holdings
(Rules 1688 and 2126).
I tried having the Agoran Credit Union work around this by defining
obligations to do 2-for-1 VC transfers, but it proved sufficiently
I consent to being Bankor of the following contract.
1) The name of this contract is The National Bank of Agora.
2) At any given time, exactly one member of this contract is the Bankor. The
Bankor may transfer this position to any consenting member.
3) A person MAY join this contract by announce
On Thursday 22 November 2007 23:31:56 Roger Hicks wrote:
> Decision: I intend with Agoran Consent to unconditionally surrender to B
Nomic.
>
> Options: SUPPORT, OBJECT
>
> SUPPORT: comex, OscarMeyr
> OBJECT: Zefram, Levi
>
> The option selected by Agora is: SUPPORT
>
> I hereby unconditionally
32 matches
Mail list logo
