On 10/24/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 October 2007, Ian Kelly wrote:
> > AGAINST. If it were just R754, I would have considered voting FOR.
> You want MMI to have a higher power than Definition Definitions!? MMI is a
> lot more likely to have problems, a more interesting
Ian Kelly wrote:
> Noting this, I find that FOR
>and SUPPORT are, in fact, synonyms, and I judge TRUE accordingly.
I'd also like to bring up a precedent from 1997, when the Frankenstein
Rule said that Frankenstein Monsters get an extra vote and that there
was
On Wednesday 24 October 2007, Ian Kelly wrote:
> AGAINST. If it were just R754, I would have considered voting FOR.
You want MMI to have a higher power than Definition Definitions!? MMI is a
lot more likely to have problems, a more interesting target to amend and
improve, and worked just fine i
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 16:31:46 Ian Kelly wrote:
> > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1764
> Noting this, I find that FOR and SUPPORT are, in fact, synonyms, and
> I judge TRUE accordingly.
>
> -root
>
I would just like to note that, conveniently, there is no cha
Quoting Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Peekee wrote:
1+1 = 3
Based on the above: I am the winner there are no rules.
How do you figure?
egg.
--
Peekee
5 matches
Mail list logo