I wrote:
>I ran it by hand and it output "Pikhq\n". Debug mode of the villes page
>reveals a bug in that interpreter:
I reported the bug, and the interpreter is now repaired. It gives the
correct output on the Pikhq program.
-zefram
Ed Murphy wrote:
>How do you figure?
It's fundamental propositional logic: everything follows from a falsehood.
-zefram
Ed Murphy wrote:
>Mrphl? I ran this through http://koti.mbnet.fi/villes/php/bf.php
>and http://www.iwriteiam.nl/Ha_bf_online.html and neither one gave
>any coherent output.
I ran it by hand and it output "Pikhq\n". Debug mode of the villes page
reveals a bug in that interpreter:
1 (0): > | a
Josiah Worcester wrote:
>As a Brainfuck programmer,
Ah yes, a much nicer language than it is given credit for. Unreadable,
but easy to write in.
On the subject of unreadable programs, may I draw your attention to my
own efforts in write-only Perl:
http://www.fysh.org/~zefram/eht/eht
http://www.
Ed Murphy wrote:
>Proto-proto: Change the higher-than-previous from CAN to SHALL, but
>change precedence from lowest ID number to earliest date of creation,
>and require a sufficiently informative annotation for rules that broke
>the higher-than-previous requirement.
Sounds cumbersome.
-zefram
Ed Murphy wrote:
> Another possible interpretation is that the
>members are indirectly in unanimous agreement to abide by the
>outcome of the non-unanimous voting process (R1742 should
>probably be amended to make this explicit).
That's pretty much what I intended when I drafted the pr
6 matches
Mail list logo
