Ed Murphy wrote:
6) As soon as possible after a member requests credit, the Bankor
SHALL create in eir possession, for each color of VC in eir
possession, minimum(100*X-Y,0) kopecks of that color, where X is
the number of VCs of that color in eir possession, and Y is the
number of ko
Eris wrote:
On 9/23/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Goddess Eris 1 5 5 1R 2B
I should have 1 black VC, no?
You're right; your judgement on culpability was late, but your
judgement on sentencing wasn't (the ASAP timer didn't start
ticking until your j
On 9/23/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Goddess Eris 1 5 5 1R 2B
I should have 1 black VC, no?
--
Eris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On 9/23/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SUPPORT: BobTHJ, comex, pikhq, Levi
> OBJECT: Eris
*sniff* I love the smell of scams in the morning.
--
Eris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On 9/23/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Disposition:applicable, OVERRULE to APOLOGY
> with prescribed words 'espalier',
> 'conjunctive', 'stoat', 'ovation',
>
On 9/23/07, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Out of *immense* curiosity, is there anything in the rules that says
> that a non-player may call for judgement? I don't feel like doing a
> CFJ on that at the moment; just wonder if anyone knows.
Absolutely, although only for inquiry and (
On 9/23/07, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I CFJ on the following statement: Upon joining Agora as a first-class
> player, Pikhq obtained one white VC, and is of the white party.
I think everybody will agree with you in this case. There's usually
no need to CFJ over simple record-k
On Sunday 23 September 2007 22:32:31 Ed Murphy wrote:
> Primarily so I could do the following.
>
> I call for judgement on the following statements, and request linked
> assignments:
Out of *immense* curiosity, is there anything in the rules that says
that a non-player may call for judgement? I
On Sunday 23 September 2007 22:05:21 Ed Murphy wrote:
> I cause the AFO to publish the following.
You can't do that, having both deregistered and left the AFO. . .
Wait, never mind. You've not left the AFO, merely Human Point Two.
>Peekee and pikhq belonged to the Gray Party.
Wrong. By Rule 21
9 matches
Mail list logo