DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Speaker] The List

2007-09-18 Thread Ian Kelly
On 9/18/07, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sep 17, 2007, at 9:13 PM, Ian Kelly wrote: > > The List > Wed 29 Aug 05:38:44 Adoption of Proposal 5147 adds Spies and Fools > > > This is just too tempting... I flip my truthiness to Fool. You can't. -root

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Nominations

2007-09-18 Thread Ian Kelly
On 9/18/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 18 September 2007, Ian Kelly wrote: > > Why? I don't have any problems with partnerships voting in elections. > > > > -root > > Hmm... > > Well, then why can't they vote in democratic proposals, etc.? > > Presently, a group of n people can

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Nominations

2007-09-18 Thread comex
On Tuesday 18 September 2007, Ian Kelly wrote: > Why? I don't have any problems with partnerships voting in elections. > > -root Hmm... Well, then why can't they vote in democratic proposals, etc.? Presently, a group of n people can have (2^n)-1 votes in an election. Every subset of the group

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Nominations

2007-09-18 Thread Ian Kelly
On 9/18/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 18 September 2007, Ed Murphy wrote: > > I recommend that the other partners of the AFO not re-cast this > > vote without giving an argument in support of eir choice. > > > Hmm... > I wonder how long until someone proposes disallowing partner

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Big Brother is an R2145 partnership

2007-09-18 Thread Ian Kelly
On 9/18/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, the subject line means nothing. You know that. > http://cfj.qoid.us/1631 Irrelevant. The only class of entity that you're capable of registering on the entity's behalf, other than yourself, is the class of R2145 partnerships. -root

DIS: Re: BUS: Big Brother is an R2145 partnership

2007-09-18 Thread comex
On Tuesday 18 September 2007, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > No evidence is given for the assertion (made in the subject line of the > purported registration) that an entity known as "Big Brother" is in fact > a R2145 partnership; in any event if it is one is also much have a basis > of at least two perso

DIS: Re: BUS: Nominations

2007-09-18 Thread comex
On Tuesday 18 September 2007, Ed Murphy wrote: > I recommend that the other partners of the AFO not re-cast this > vote without giving an argument in support of eir choice. Hmm... I wonder how long until someone proposes disallowing partnerships from voting on 2154 decisions. If you do, make me

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1741: assign root

2007-09-18 Thread Ian Kelly
On 9/18/07, Peekee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I recommend all players use email clients that render html messages > correctly. If the appeal fails should this be legislated? The current > fora rules do not mention emails explicitly, I assume this is > deliberate. How about (roughly): > > > >

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Citizenship cleansing

2007-09-18 Thread Ian Kelly
On 9/18/07, Peekee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > H. Promotor Zefram, I hereby submit the following proposal titled > > "Citizenship cleansing" (AI=1, II=0): > > > > If eekeeP is a player distinct from Peekee, e is deregistered. > > If hedgehogcull is a pl

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Nominations

2007-09-18 Thread Peekee
Quoting Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 9/18/07, Peekee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Quoting Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 9/17/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > I announce the initiation of an Agoran decision for the position of >> > Scorekeepor as per Rule 2154. The options are

DIS: Re: BUS: Nominations

2007-09-18 Thread Taral
On 9/18/07, Peekee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On 9/17/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > I announce the initiation of an Agoran decision for the position of > >> > Scorekeepor as per Rule 2154. The options are Wooble and Zefram. > >> > >>

Re: DIS: Proto: Variables

2007-09-18 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On 9/18/07, Peekee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > root wrote: > > > >> On 9/17/07, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> On 9/17/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Zefram wrote: > > > It seems to me that switches are a speci

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1741: assign root

2007-09-18 Thread Peekee
Quoting Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 5 out of 7 email readers were capable of rendering the message despite the lack of the MIME-Version header. In addition, there is no evidence that any player or watcher was unable to read the message with a reasonable amount of effort. I therefore find th

Re: DIS: Proto: Variables

2007-09-18 Thread Peekee
Quoting Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: root wrote: On 9/17/07, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 9/17/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Zefram wrote: It seems to me that switches are a special case of your variable concept, where the restricting type is an enumeration. I