DIS: Re: BUS: Inactivity

2007-09-16 Thread Taral
On 9/16/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/16/07, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I announce my intent to make BobTHJ inactive without objection. > > > > I vote OBJECT. I don't have much time but I'm still here. Ah, well, at least make yourself ineligible to judge if you don't

DIS: RE: Proposal: Concerning a potential scam

2007-09-16 Thread Josiah Worcester
On Sunday 16 September 2007 18:35:19 comex wrote: > > You missed the clause "without objection", which means that any player > can object to the attempted inactivity flip within four days before it > actually takes effect. Indeed, you're right that I missed that clause. I hereby withdraw my propo

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Concerning a potential scam

2007-09-16 Thread comex
On 9/16/07, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rule 2130 shall be amended, such that the last sentence states: This is ambiguous as to whether or not the existing last sentence is removed. > (e) Unscamster, which may be awarded to any Player who has shown great > enthusiasm, pe

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Concerning a potential scam

2007-09-16 Thread comex
On 9/16/07, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Upon reading the rules, I came across the discovery that any player > may make > another player inactive You missed the clause "without objection", which means that any player can object to the attempted inactivity flip within four