Re: DIS: Pseudo-judgement of CFJ 1718

On 8/9/07, Peekee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Surely it is best to resolve the issue in the safety of the discussion > forum rather than with messages that would effect the game state. Surely it would be best to have your ISP block all traffic on port 25 from your unsecured resender? -- Geoff

Re: DIS: Pseudo-judgement of CFJ 1718

Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Pseudo-judgement of CFJ 1718: The message in question has no substantive effect, regardless of the identity of its submitter. I recommend a CFJ regarding the proposal "Support Ordinary" (or purported proposal, if submitted by a non-player). I recommend reading up on

DIS: map, reminder

I'm not sure if my message with subject 'map' actually initiated an Agoran decision, but I would appreciate support and/or objection. The message read as follows: > I intend, with Agoran Consent, to politely ask the rulekeepor to move > the map to the beginning of the FLR. signature.asc Descr

DIS: Pseudo-judgement of CFJ 1718

Pseudo-judgement of CFJ 1718: The message in question has no substantive effect, regardless of the identity of its submitter. I recommend a CFJ regarding the proposal "Support Ordinary" (or purported proposal, if submitted by a non-player). I recommend reading up on Steve's Spam Scam, then runni