On 7/14/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Back in 1996 a similar proposal was adopted, recognising Canada as a
fellow nomic and instructing the Ambassador to seek diplomatic links.
The rule defining the Ambassador was then repealed before the directive
could be carried out. Murphy's present
Taral wrote:
>Why?
Back in 1996 a similar proposal was adopted, recognising Canada as a
fellow nomic and instructing the Ambassador to seek diplomatic links.
The rule defining the Ambassador was then repealed before the directive
could be carried out. Murphy's present proposal is just unfinished
Eris wrote:
On 7/13/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Proto-Proposal: Expanded foreign relations
Upon the adoption of this proposal, the Ambassador is ordered to
seek mutual recognition between Agora Nomic and Canada.
Why?
Why not?
On 7/13/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Proto-Proposal: Expanded foreign relations
Upon the adoption of this proposal, the Ambassador is ordered to
seek mutual recognition between Agora Nomic and Canada.
Why?
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further tr
On 7/14/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Each eligible voter on this proposal who did not submit any ballots on
this proposal that counted towards quorum is awarded the patent title
"Apathetic Wastrel".
Ooo, I'm tempted to withhold my vote just to earn that exciting patent title.
FYI, I
Ed Murphy wrote:
>5080 FOR x 4 (yes, I have a reason for doing this)
Just the potential reward/penalty, or something better?
-zefram
Zefram wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gains two Green VCs if the office has a weekly report, or
one Green VC if the office has only a monthly report,
What if the office has neither?
Then the office has no salary.
What about non-report duties? The office of promotor h
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> gains two Green VCs if the office has a weekly report, or
> one Green VC if the office has only a monthly report,
What if the office has neither?
What about non-report duties? The office of promotor has no official
report at all, but weekly duties.
On 7/14/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 14 July 2007, Ed Murphy wrote:
> comex wrote:
> > I spend 2 VCs to increase my voting limit on ordinary proposals by 1.
> > I vote AGAINST *8
>
> The eighth vote will be invalid.
Why?
Because your voting limit for the proposal is determin
On Saturday 14 July 2007, Ed Murphy wrote:
> comex wrote:
> > I spend 2 VCs to increase my voting limit on ordinary proposals by 1.
> > I vote AGAINST *8
>
> The eighth vote will be invalid.
Why?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Saturday 14 July 2007, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I cause Human Point Two to publish the following.
You could try to ratify this, by the way.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Amend Rule 2126 to assign each player a state with a population,
some portion of which supports em.
What will this achieve?
Nothing directly, but maybe others will come up with new effects
based on these populations. (This is roughly inspired by my
"Unruly Mo
Ed Murphy wrote:
>Amend Rule 2126 to assign each player a state with a population,
>some portion of which supports em.
What will this achieve?
-zefram
13 matches
Mail list logo
