quazie wrote:
>I vote PRESENT on any proposal that is within its voting period that I
>have not yet voted upon.
NTTPF.
-zefram
Zefram wrote:
I vote FOR proposal 4997.
-zefram
I vote FOR proposal 4997
I vote PRESENT on any proposal that is within its voting period that I
have not yet voted upon.
root wrote:
> And therein lies the problem with appealing the
> judgments: in the event that they're overturned, they never existed,
> and the appeal is thus just as invalid as the original judgments.
For example, what happens if Murphy's CFJ (not the PPs) is appealed?
If it's sustainted, it's su
root wrote:
> And therein lies the problem with appealing the
> judgments: in the event that they're overturned, they never existed,
> and the appeal is thus just as invalid as the original judgments.
Funny, that's exactly what I claimed when I said my deregistration
paradox couldn't be resolved
4 matches
Mail list logo
