Re: DIS: problem with R2089

Kerim Aydin wrote: >What was the date this set of proposals took effect? The history of R2089 is: Created by Proposal 4657 (Sherlock), 29 March 2005 Amended(1) by Proposal 4706 (Quazie), 18 April 2005 Amended(2) by Proposal 4715 (Goethe), 25 April 2005 Amended(3) by Proposal 4726 (root), 25 April

DIS: (no subject)

Zefram wrote: > Could those who were playing at the time comment on the consequences of > the error? Goethe? What was the date this set of proposals took effect? My card log scripts should still run and it would be easy to see if any checkouts occurred illegally within the 24-hour window (there

DIS: problem with R2089

I've found an error in the text of R2089/4 that were published from 2005-04-25 to 2005-08-06. R2089/4 was derived from R2089/1 by a series of three amendments by proposals in the same batch (P4715, P4726, and P4728), so R2089/2 and R2089/3 were never published. The published R2089/4 reflects the