DIS: Re: BUS: Submission to the Clerk of the Courts

Sherlock wrote: (Probably the wrong time to mention this, but it appears Cantus Cygnaeus doesn't work 100%, since the rule still references the Registrar, as does at least one other rule.) I came in on a CFJ, it would be an almighty disappointment to me if I failed to go out on one. -G.

DIS: FRC round 249 has begun

and the theme is questions and answers. Participation is open to december 28th. http://groups.google.com/group/frc-play/about -- He thought he could organize freedom how naive and controlling of him

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Submission to the Clerk of the Courts

On 12/15/06, Jonathan Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A major problem at the moment is probably players simply not knowing the new rulesry. Combine that with the major ongoing problem of most of us not knowing the thousands of CFJ's that have occurred in the last 14 years and it can be kind of

DIS: Re: BUS: Submission to the Clerk of the Courts

> The problem is not any particular Rule. Looking back at the > Proposal Pool, the CotC archives, the "Assessor's" reports, and the > latest game (cards), it is clear that I am wasting time trying to > play a game with the current crop of Agorans, even the modest rate > of play I try to enjoy is

DIS: Re: BUS: Submission to the Clerk of the Courts

On 12/15/06, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Agora is dead. Goodbye. Although ordinarily I would be sorry to see you go, your assessment is clearly correct. Agora has been dead for years, but because it was the "oldest, wisest Nomic", we refused to admit it. I hope to see you around *

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Hold

root wrote: On 12/14/06, *Grey Knight* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > Wait a minute, I think GreyKnight mistakenly wrote FALSE instead of > TRUE. (I did pretty much the same thing myself, once.) As such, I > appeal the judgement of CFJ 1589. I