On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 05:33:01PM -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Actually, this may not be true! Can someone read R1950 and tell me
> if it's implied? Maud suggested that this language implies it
> in the last version, and I didn't change the wording, but I'm not
> finding it!
The relevant text
On 9/21/06, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Not exactly (I should have noted your attempt). Votes are only
> counted for people who are players when the voting period for
> a proposal *starts*.
Actually, this may not be true! Can someone read R
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Not exactly (I should have noted your attempt). Votes are only
counted for people who are players when the voting period for
a proposal *starts*.
Actually, this may not be true! Can someone read R1950 and tell me
if it's implied? Maud suggested that t
Grey Knight wrote:
I voted on these too. Did I do something wrong?
Not exactly (I should have noted your attempt). Votes are only
counted for people who are players when the voting period for
a proposal *starts*. Since you joined two days after the
proposals were sent out, your votes didn't
--- Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I take up the role of vote(ing) collector for proposals
> 4869 and 4870. -Goethe
>
> 4869: FOR: root, Goethe, OscarMeyr, Eris
> AGAINST: Maud
> PRESENT: Sherlock
> VI: 4
> AI: 1
> Result: AD
5 matches
Mail list logo