On Thursday, June 20, 2024, at 12:19 AM, Nanograte Knowledge Technologies wrote:
> Can machines really think? Let's redefine thinking as low-level, spoon fed
> reasoning in an unconscious state, then perhaps they could be said to be able
> to.
We know a machine can view its own code and modify i
and practice first, before being
able to apply reasoning features.
I still think Pitrat's machine came closest to human reasoning.
____________
From: Matt Mahoney
Sent: Wednesday, 19 June 2024 23:41
To: AGI
Subject: Re: [agi] Internal Time-Consciousness Machine (IT
ve tried to prompt AI to be funny or surprising or interesting or creative,
but it just doesn’t work.”
www.technologyreview.com
From: Matt Mahoney
Sent: Wednesday, 19 June 2024 23:41
To: AGI
Subject: Re: [agi] Internal Time-Consciousness Machine (ITCM)
Remember
That was in response to Matt Mahoney's rather interesting reply.
>>
>> ----------
>> *From:* Nanograte Knowledge Technologies
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 19 June 2024 21:06
>> *To:* AGI
>> *Subject:* Re: [agi] Internal Time-Consciousness Machin
dnesday, 19 June 2024 21:06
> *To:* AGI
> *Subject:* Re: [agi] Internal Time-Consciousness Machine (ITCM)
>
> You're confirming that you believe as you believe, providing your version
> of evidence that everything we observe is relative. You're also asserting
> how
PS: That was in response to Matt Mahoney's rather interesting reply.
From: Nanograte Knowledge Technologies
Sent: Wednesday, 19 June 2024 21:06
To: AGI
Subject: Re: [agi] Internal Time-Consciousness Machine (ITCM)
You're confirming that you beli
ef about this, either way.
From: Matt Mahoney
Sent: Wednesday, 19 June 2024 19:25
To: AGI
Subject: Re: [agi] Internal Time-Consciousness Machine (ITCM)
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024, 12:40 AM Nanograte Knowledge Technologies
mailto:nano...@live.com>> wrote:
In your opi
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024, 12:40 AM Nanograte Knowledge Technologies <
nano...@live.com> wrote:
> In your opinion then, consciousness cannot yet be defined properly, but
> you know for certain that there is no such a thing as a kind of life after
> death, or a soul that leaves earth, even forever?
>
>
: Matt Mahoney
Sent: Wednesday, 19 June 2024 05:10
To: AGI
Subject: Re: [agi] Internal Time-Consciousness Machine (ITCM)
The appendix discusses consciousness, self awareness, emotions, and free will,
but the authors are using strictly behavioral definitions for these terms so
they can
The appendix discusses consciousness, self awareness, emotions, and free
will, but the authors are using strictly behavioral definitions for these
terms so they can legitimately model them. They model emotions as having 3
dimensions of pleasure, arousal, and dominance. An agent capable of acting
to
On Monday, June 17, 2024, at 5:07 PM, Mike Archbold wrote:
> It seems like a reasonable start as a basis. I don't see how it relates to
> consciousness really, except that I think they emphasize a real time aspect
> and a flow of time which is good.
If you read the appendix a few times you wil
They say "understanding" a lot but don't really define it (perhaps
implicitly).
It seems like a reasonable start as a basis. I don't see how it relates to
consciousness really, except that I think they emphasize a real time aspect
and a flow of time which is good.
On Sat, Jun 15, 2024 at 5:10 PM
For those of us pursuing consciousness-based AGI this is an interesting paper
that gets more practical... LLM agent based but still v. interesting:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.20097
--
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink:
https://agi.topicbo
13 matches
Mail list logo
