John Rose said:
> Prob. is only he can read the code! LOL
Today I have been porting more JavaScript AI into Forth.
MP said:
> I’ve honestly tried reading his source and explanations.
Thank you for looking into it.
Mike Archbold said:
> Roll on Arthur...
http://ai.neocites.org/var.html -- now is
Most interesting. So, the timespace continuum is effectively being split? I
don't buy it. You cannot sustainably entangle one and not the other, not even
as an antithesical exercise. You're just begging for your data to disappear
into the Void.
From: johnr...@pol
Jim, I think for this kind of reasoning to evolve, one would always have to
return to an ontological platform. For example, for reasoning, one would
require a meta-methodology for reasoning effectively with. For selectively
forgetting and learning, an evolution-based methodology is required. For
Ehm, "chunking out code"...that's ah, yeah good way to describe it 😊
I agree. Arthur, you need to elevate yourself man. The Elon Musk's of the world
are stealing all the thunder.
John
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Archbold via AGI
>
> At least A.T. Murray is in the trenches chunki
At least A.T. Murray is in the trenches chunking out code, unlike all
of our celebrities like Elon Musk and Bill Gates who, while they may
have more money, just write about it! Roll on Arthur...
On 6/21/18, MP via AGI wrote:
> I’ve honestly tried reading his source and explanations.
>
> He loses
Jim, I see what you mean about symbols vs other discrete data and
structures etc. I suppose an "unreadable" piece of data could still be
converted into symbols, though. An analogy would be that when we input
a sound, it is converted to something, a percept... an AGI could input
some unreadable data
I’ve honestly tried reading his source and explanations.
He loses me at these "perpendicular mental fiber" stuff.
Even with my cruddy JavaScript to Java translation I still don’t get it... but
it’s something. At least it talks through a ton of weird code.
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
On Thu, Ju
Oh OK everybody you can throw away your keyboards, Mentifex created the first
AGI...
Prob. is only he can read the code! LOL
John
--
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink:
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T0eb019c4c2b48817-Md4b0bb7b18473
Oohh now this is what I'm talkin 'bout, get a little AGI PSI action goin' on in
that blockchain consciousness proposal:
"Quantum Blockchain using entanglement in time"
https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.05979
John
--
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Per
Here are a more blockchain distributed computing videos. Applicable? Maybe.
Entertaining? Yes.
The networks are probably laggy since some just use unused machine resources
like BOINC but allow buying and selling via coins or tokens. But not every AGI
component needs hyper low-latency computing
Symbol Based Reasoning is discrete, but a computer can use discrete
data that would not make sense to us so the term symbolic might be
misleading. I am not opposed to weighted reasoning (like neural
networks or Bayesian Networks) and I think reasoning has to use
networks of relations. If weighted n
This sounds reasonable but I would argue that motivation is not really
reasoning but motivation is more like some variation of "pursue the
good and avoid the bad" (the short term version is hedonism, pursue
pleasure and avoid pain).
I think it may have been Searle who claimed something to the effe
12 matches
Mail list logo
