Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations

2021-03-02 Thread dave
+1 Dennis, I look at not only the hardware specs but it interface limitation as well. Having multiple 10G ports sets that model up for a good edge router not intended for nat. On 3/1/21 4:22 PM, Dennis Burgess wrote: We have customers with dual 10gig bonded links running 12-15gig inbound wit

Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations

2021-03-02 Thread Carl Peterson
When I looked at the long term (greater than 10 year) cost of CGNAT on Juniper vs buying more IPV4, buying more IPV4 came out ahead. Your results may vary. On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 7:50 AM dave wrote: > +1 > Dennis, > I look at not only the hardware specs but it interface limitation as well. > Ha

Re: [AFMUG] icmp network strangeness

2021-03-02 Thread MVTVWISPA
IP Conflict can cause those types of issues from what I have experienced From: AF On Behalf Of Steve Jones Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 8:53 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] icmp network strangeness I hate exact oddities On Mon, Mar 1, 2021, 7:26 PM TJ Tr

[AFMUG] librenms and a mikrotik not collecting data

2021-03-02 Thread Steve Jones
I have a mikrotik rb1100ahx2 on a fairly small site I cant track what the deal is with librenms graphing this thing. it shows down all the time running the manual scan says no response, but I can ping from libre server, I can ping to libre server from it i logged the only drop rule in the router ha

Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations

2021-03-02 Thread Sterling Jacobson
Good point. And ARIN is still handing out IPv4 on the wait list as well. But we went ahead and just went CGNAT across everything just to push for IPv6 and the future. Some customers complained about servers they were hosting that we didn’t know about, and some complained about some games on Xb