Re: [AFMUG] ISP level DHCP server

2024-11-08 Thread Josh Luthman
Mark, We're using Calix. I simply do a Mikrotik DHCP server. In time I may move over to Kea. Both work with our billing software. All customers are u6x with RG. On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 10:44 PM Mark - Myakka Technologies via AF < af@af.afmug.com> wrote: > Sterling, > > > > We are using Calix,

Re: [AFMUG] ISP level DHCP server

2024-11-08 Thread Chris Fabien
Mark, With Calix this is a few settings in the VLAN config for the data service vlan. For a typical DHCP data vlan you'll probably want: HEMLOCK-E7-2_1# show running-config vlan 121 vlan 121 description DHCP_DATA l2-dhcp-profile SNOOP_SINGLE source-verify ENABLED mff ENABLED !

Re: [AFMUG] ISP level DHCP server

2024-11-07 Thread Mark - Myakka Technologies via AF
Sterling,   We are using Calix, so this sounds like the solution.  I'll dig a bit deeper in to their docs.   Thanks to everyone. -- Best regards,  Mark                            mailto:m...@mailmt.com Myakka Communications www.Myakka.com -- Tuesday, November 5, 2024, 7:15:34 PM, you wrote

Re: [AFMUG] ISP level DHCP server

2024-11-07 Thread Adam Moffett
This may have been answered, but I'm behind on the list traffic and I'm not going to read everything. Proper ISP equipment should prevent BUM traffic from traveling from CPE to CPE. Any broadcast should only go up to your gateway. On your gateway you'll enable DHCP Relay pointing at your DHCP se

Re: [AFMUG] ISP level DHCP server

2024-11-05 Thread Sterling Jacobson via AF
What equipment? Some types of equipment like our Calix XGSPON, handles this natively, so you can just use DHCP and it will already isolate the clients. We still have active ethernet in some parts of our network, so port isolation or switch port forwarding or similar items are what you are looki

Re: [AFMUG] ISP level DHCP server

2024-11-05 Thread Trey Scarborough
What routers do you use to terminate your L2 and issue your dhcp? Most support /32 in some way or another. you really dont need the option 121 just a /32 with a default works. I have done this on juniper, cisco, mikrotik, netelastic, and nokia. Some of those vendors require a BNG license to sup

Re: [AFMUG] ISP level DHCP server

2024-11-05 Thread Josh Luthman
We NAT'ed our wireless SM to solve that. Now that we're doing fiber (PON) the ONT are all RG so it's nat no matter what. Technically you could bridge the ONT but 99.999% of our customers are simply RG/NAT. On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 4:39 PM Mark - Myakka Technologies via AF < af@af.afmug.com> wrote: