Why are you thinking about buying spinning hard drives in the year 2018?
The average ISP doesn't need that much storage. Start looking at Samsung
SATA3 SSDs if you're in the 2.5" form factor.
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 7:37 AM, Matt wrote:
> Looking at updating the drives on one of our boxes we run
I rarely have ever had a disk fail. Last 3 months I am on second one
in same RAID 10 array. Both these drives, the one I already replaced
and the one alarming now, are same model and purchased together and
have ran for close too 3 years. But I have busier drives that have
run much longer.
--
A
Anytime I see SxAS now my mind automatically jumps to As A Service...
So I saw SAAS drives Yeah, SAAS drives with higher IOPS what a concept...
On 07/25/2018 07:40 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
I went 7200 RPM SAS. SAS drives have higher IOPS than SATA drives.
I usually try to wade through here wh
There is also a vibration standard. Higher end drives will have a lower
vibration; hence more longevity.
bp
On 7/25/2018 9:13 AM, Jesse DuPont wrote:
My impression is it's a duty cycle thing. Non-enterprise drives are
not rated for the "always-on/always thrashing" use case of a VM server
or
Message -
From: "Jesse DuPont"
To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group"
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 11:13:14 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Enterprise SATA Drives
My impression is it's a duty cycle thing. Non-enterprise drives are not
rated for the "always-on/alwa
My impression is it's a duty cycle thing. Non-enterprise drives are not
rated for the "always-on/always thrashing" use case of a VM server or
NAS environment. To be more specific, I generally use drives that are
approved by NAS vendors (WD RED, HSTG Enterprise, etc.). As Mike said,
if you can g
I went 7200 RPM SAS. SAS drives have higher IOPS than SATA drives.
I usually try to wade through here when getting drives:
https://www.storagereview.com/
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
