Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

ers. > > > > -PK > > > > *From:* AF *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie > *Sent:* Monday, December 21, 2020 10:27 AM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA > > > > What does the letter need to contain that you attach to the

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

You can view other peoples filing and see their letters. -PK From: AF On Behalf Of Jason McKemie Sent: Monday, December 21, 2020 10:27 AM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA What does the letter need to contain that you attach to the application? I was

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

Oh yeah, and the stop buzzer contact info…. From: AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] On Behalf Of James Howard Sent: Monday, December 21, 2020 6:16 PM To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA I believe we just listed out as accurately as we could the ar

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

I believe we just listed out as accurately as we could the area that we were applying for. From: AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie Sent: Monday, December 21, 2020 12:27 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA What does the letter need

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

IANL (i am not a lawyer) need to include justification for why you need to use it, also need to include a "stop buzzer" contact in case you are interfering with an incumbent. we used steve coran sco...@lermansenter.com to dot all the "i's" and cross all the "t's" but others have done all the work

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

What does the letter need to contain that you attach to the application? I was trying to apply, but there are no guidelines as far as I can tell. On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 11:57 AM Peter Kranz via AF wrote: > No fee to renew, I just recently had my 5.9 STA approved again. > > > > -PEter > > > > *

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

No fee to renew, I just recently had my 5.9 STA approved again. -PEter From: AF On Behalf Of James Howard Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2020 1:15 PM To: 'af@af.afmug.com' Subject: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA Does anyone know if you have to pay a fee to renew the STA? Our renewal request has been

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

; Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA Hmm… I wish they would tell you why it’s pending. The application status page just gives general reasons such as waiting for fees. We did file before the expiration (barely) so hopefully we’re good. From: AF mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com> > On

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA IANL (I am not a lawyer) but my lawyer told me that as long as the extension was filed before the expiration date of the current STA then you are good to go. No FCC fees for the STA. Sean Heskett ZIRKEL Internet • WiFi • Phone • TV 970-871

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

IANL (I am not a lawyer) but my lawyer told me that as long as the extension was filed before the expiration date of the current STA then you are good to go. No FCC fees for the STA. *Sean Heskett* *ZIRKEL * *Internet • WiFi • Phone • TV* 970-871-8500 x100 - Office Website

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

Mr. Trout, What you provided helped. I am not the normal person for FCC applications so there was a bit of a learning curve on some of the form 601 questions. I didn't even know you could do it online. I have now submitted after getting an email approval earlier. Thank you, Gilbert On Mon, Apr 20

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

I have gotten approval, I now must file the form within 10 days. The license is applicable for only 60. Gilbert On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 7:37 PM TJ Trout wrote: > File Number 0009030232 > > Look up that file number and copy paste using your irrelevant company and > geographical information make

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

I hope the massive amounts of applications just shows the necessity of us needing this extra spectrum long term. On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 12:05 AM Steve Jones wrote: > wow man, thats harsh, we may be small but we arent irrelevant :-) We > matter to somebody man > > I think getting inundated may

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

wow man, thats harsh, we may be small but we arent irrelevant :-) We matter to somebody man I think getting inundated may just get them to give it to us. The geographic data was one thing i didnt know, do i just do 4 corners and box in out territory? On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 9:40 PM TJ Trout wro

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

FYI it's not as simple as the FCC receiving an application and saying "you're approved" . They have to get approval from the incumbent license holders as well as the ntia? For each individual wisp. On Mon, Apr 20, 2020, 7:36 PM TJ Trout wrote: > File Number 0009030232 > > Look up that file

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

File Number 0009030232 Look up that file number and copy paste using your irrelevant company and geographical information make sure that you open and view all of the attachments download them edit copy paste with relevant company and geographical information. I'm guessing at this point the STA re

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

i cant find it when i went to do it it seemed too straight forward for me to have been doing it correctly On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 8:53 PM TJ Trout wrote: > i posted a tutorial on facebook wisp talk, or at least a barebone > tutorial, I guess I'm probably a majority of the reason that no one has

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

i posted a tutorial on facebook wisp talk, or at least a barebone tutorial, I guess I'm probably a majority of the reason that no one has received the STA. I think at this point it's not even worth the keystrokes guys... On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 6:00 PM Steve Jones wrote: > has anyone put togethe

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

has anyone put together a tutorial On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 4:47 PM Gilbert Gutierrez < mailing-li...@phxinternet.com> wrote: > Those of you that applied...What schedules did you attach to your 601 > application? There is a lot with the application and being able to > narrow it down would be a he