Re: [AFMUG] Twitter by any other name would still smell

2025-03-19 Thread Adam Moffett
To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Twitter by any other name would still smell Let’s assume the this woman or DOGE is uncovering a lot of this fraud, deception, misappropriation of funds or whatever we are questioning as citizens. Do you honestly think that since t

Re: [AFMUG] Twitter by any other name would still smell

2025-03-18 Thread Brian Webster
: Re: [AFMUG] Twitter by any other name would still smell I'm not sure what you mean. There were claims from her in the link you sent earlier. I itemized and responded to them. I assume her financial numbers and her data about who works for which organization are largely correct be

Re: [AFMUG] Twitter by any other name would still smell

2025-03-17 Thread Adam Moffett
he fence and tell me that the left isn't down their own social media rabbit-holes. -Adam From: AF on behalf of Chuck Sent: Monday, March 17, 2025 12:42 PM To: af@af.afmug.com Cc: af@af.afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Twitter by any other name would stil

Re: [AFMUG] Twitter by any other name would still smell

2025-03-17 Thread Ken Hohhof
view that as the same thing Rolling Stone did? Some would call it “FAFO”. I’m not sure I see any good guys in this story. From: AF On Behalf Of Chuck Sent: Monday, March 17, 2025 11:42 AM To: af@af.afmug.com Cc: af@af.afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Twitter by any other name would still smell

Re: [AFMUG] Twitter by any other name would still smell

2025-03-17 Thread Mike Hammett
sage - From: "Chuck" To: af@af.afmug.com Cc: af@af.afmug.com Sent: Monday, March 17, 2025 11:42:05 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Twitter by any other name would still smell She never made any claims. She was anon and doing it as a hobby. RS outed her. She has never made any statement as t

Re: [AFMUG] Twitter by any other name would still smell

2025-03-17 Thread Chuck
not a news source. From: AF on behalf of Jeff Broadwick - Lists Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2025 2:28 PM To: af@af.afmug.com Cc: af@af.afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Twitter by any other name would still smell   X is an amazing news source! Like any other source, you have to look at t

Re: [AFMUG] Twitter by any other name would still smell

2025-03-17 Thread Adam Moffett
t unsupported theories. This is not a news source. From: AF on behalf of Jeff Broadwick - Lists Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2025 2:28 PM To: af@af.afmug.com Cc: af@af.afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Twitter by any other name would still smell X is an amazing news source! Like any other source, yo

Re: [AFMUG] Twitter by any other name would still smell

2025-03-16 Thread Jeff Broadwick - Lists
X is an amazing news source!Like any other source, you have to look at the bias of the contributor, but that’s pretty easy.It’s now the free speech platform of choice.  The crowd fact checking is quite good…unless one can’t let go of past lies that “fact checkers” regularly spewed.Regards,Jeff Jeff

Re: [AFMUG] Twitter by any other name would still smell

2025-03-16 Thread Bill Prince
Twitter has become a cesspool of DISinformation. I wouldn't trust anything I read on it further than I could heave a starship. bp On 3/16/2025 8:35 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: I’m more than a little disturbed by the state of things.  Apparently Twitter is now an information source?  Why? Whe

[AFMUG] Twitter by any other name would still smell

2025-03-16 Thread Adam Moffett
I’m more than a little disturbed by the state of things. Apparently Twitter is now an information source? Why? When you hear people say stuff at a cocktail party you don’t believe all of it right? It’s just a person talking. It’s not been reviewed, edited, or vetted. Even if it was Albert