Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Rogue DHCP Alert behind 450 SM

2018-09-28 Thread Sean Heskett
Yeah if the upstream box wasn’t checked then the filter wasn’t doing anything. We ran into the same problem. -Sean On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 9:45 AM Nate Burke wrote: > I missed that the upstream checkbox was not checked in the filter. I've > set it now. I'll see if that will clear up the not

Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Rogue DHCP Alert behind 450 SM

2018-09-27 Thread Dave
Ensure the router has latest firmware is all that could be suggested for that. I have seen cheap routers be leaky also become hacked by something called hickvision. Which is usually a dvr or something security related.  Sometimes they will just go bad due to too many surges on the power supply.

Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Rogue DHCP Alert behind 450 SM

2018-09-27 Thread Nate Burke
I missed that the upstream checkbox was not checked in the filter. I've set it now. I'll see if that will clear up the notices. I'm not sure why they were happening in the first place, since the customers router is working properly, and is getting it's DHCP lease on the WAN Port, why it would

Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Rogue DHCP Alert behind 450 SM

2018-09-27 Thread Nate Burke
Yes, in bridge mode, Protocol Filtering is set to block DHCP Server. On 9/27/2018 11:31 AM, Dave wrote: Is the sub in bridge mode ? If so do u have the protocol filtering set to filter up ? On 09/27/2018 10:26 AM, Nate Burke wrote: I have a single customer where their Router keeps making a Mik

Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Rogue DHCP Alert behind 450 SM

2018-09-27 Thread Dave
True unless the protocol filter direction has not been set. On 09/27/2018 11:33 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: That really sounds like a bug... With the filter set the packet shouldn't be getting through and clearly it is.  Mikrotik isn't going to conjour up the MAC address. Josh Luthman Office:

Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Rogue DHCP Alert behind 450 SM

2018-09-27 Thread Josh Luthman
That really sounds like a bug... With the filter set the packet shouldn't be getting through and clearly it is. Mikrotik isn't going to conjour up the MAC address. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 11:26 AM, N

Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Rogue DHCP Alert behind 450 SM

2018-09-27 Thread Dave
Is the sub in bridge mode ? If so do u have the protocol filtering set to filter up ? On 09/27/2018 10:26 AM, Nate Burke wrote: I have a single customer where their Router keeps making a Mikrotik generate Rogue DHCP Alerts.  The Customer is behind a 450 SM on version 15.1, and is operating nor

[AFMUG] Mikrotik Rogue DHCP Alert behind 450 SM

2018-09-27 Thread Nate Burke
I have a single customer where their Router keeps making a Mikrotik generate Rogue DHCP Alerts. The Customer is behind a 450 SM on version 15.1, and is operating normally. Their router is getting a DHCP Lease like it's supposed to, and there is only a single MAC in the bridge table. I have t