Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik L2TP and Firewalling

2019-11-19 Thread Adam Moffett
I'd assume the VPN server is assigning addresses from a pool. Allowing access from that whole pool would be the simplest thing to do. On 11/18/2019 10:34 PM, Jason McKemie wrote: Yeah, I didn't give much information there.  I did try out your first theory and it seems to have been correct. Wha

Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik L2TP and Firewalling

2019-11-18 Thread Jason McKemie
Yeah, I didn't give much information there. I did try out your first theory and it seems to have been correct. What would be the easiest way to map whatever address the VPN client currently has (assuming this can change) to the address that is assigned via the VPN server? Thanks for the suggestio

Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik L2TP and Firewalling

2019-11-18 Thread Jesse DuPont
Input chain firewall rules vs forward chain firewall rules? Maybe all the other routers are allowed to be reach from the L2TP IP in the forward chain of the VPN concentrator Mikrotik but you didn't allow the L2TP IP in the input chain of said Mikrotik?

Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik L2TP and Firewalling

2019-11-18 Thread Adam Moffett
Hard to generalize without knowing more. .but chances are the VPN server masquerades traffic from the VPN clients, so one difference might be that the VPN server will see your client coming from his private IP, and the adjacent routers might see the client coming from the VPN server's IP. 

[AFMUG] Mikrotik L2TP and Firewalling

2019-11-18 Thread Jason McKemie
I'm having an issue wherein I'm trying to lock down winbox access on some routers so that they are only accessible via VPN. The issue is that I'm still not able to access the router that is acting as the VPN server, adjacent routers work as expected, however. I assume this is misconfiguration. Any