Re: [AFMUG] Proposed Licensed Link Potential Conflict

2019-06-19 Thread mhopkins
Thank you Tim, I'll send it over to you. They are adjacent channels, I think maybe Micronet meant that because there was at least 2.8 MHz between the two that it should be OK. The emission designator 74M4D7D implies the AF-11FX actually occupies 74.4 MHz. I just get nervous sometimes about adjace

[AFMUG] Proposed Licensed Link Potential Conflict

2019-06-19 Thread mhopkins
Hello, We have a SAF 80MHz 11GHz link between a couple of towers. There is a new PCN for a new 80MHz UBNT AF-11FX link that is at the same tower site as one of our ends. Their path would shoot through our tower at that site. There is 2.8MHz of separation between our channels and the polarity i