I fix this
There must be 3 aggregation types , Url type is messed.
Best regards,
Harut.
On Feb 25, 7:29 pm, Harutyun Terteryan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm using .net lib v13 , I try to createreportwith adwordsReportServicebug
> get error from it.
>
> Here is my request `
> -SoapRequest at 25.
Hi all,
I'm trying to create report, using api v13 .net lib.
Everything corresponds with Report rules, mentioned in adwords google
group,
but for any type of report I get
* One or more report job parameters is invalid.
* Keyword doesn't allow the following aggregation types:
[DayOfWeek]
Hi Eric,
I set the namespace to be cm in the RequestHeader for the
TargetingIdeaService and rebuilt the Client libraries. I am no longer
getting the authentication issue.
But I am getting another issue like ( 'faultcode' => 'soap:Server',
'faultstring' => 'Fault occurred while processing.').
Based
Hi Dave.
I've tested Google Ajax Search API, but it gives different values from
Google Web Search.
But this is one legal way to get this data from Google.
If this is good for you - you can test it.
Seems that you will not get any luck in that, as I've tested partners
sites,
which are using Google
Does 'proximityTargets' are broken for getting traffic estimator? When
we use it we have huge results.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"AdWords API Forum" group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from th
Another example - one of the test account produced NOT_ADS_USER @
(). This was not produced by the ClientLogin API, but by a
call to the campaign service.
In this case the .NET library was not very helpful and generated a
message with exactly that code. My application cannot sort out t
Hi Eric,
thank you for your quick reply!
Unfortunately I think your summary is not precise. I checked it -
using the example from my last post with your idea "excluding the
BROAD version" doesn't work the way the Google Keyword Tool does.
The stemmed version does a better job in my case. Is ther
UPDATE: The BROAD solution is "almost" precise! But there are some
exceptions - in my example "gesetzlich krankenversicherung" still
shows up as an "additional" keyword...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"AdWords API Forum" group.
To post to this grou
Hi Raghavendra,
For all methods you are charged based on the number of results
returned by the method. In your example you are charged per-campaign
returned or per-ad group returned.
Best,
- Eric Koleda, AdWords API Team
On Feb 25, 6:57 am, RAGHAVENDRA SUDHA
wrote:
> HI,
>
> i was going throug
Hi Harroot,
The ContentPlacement report requires three aggregationType values, and
you are only setting two. Please see the aggregationTypes section for
more information:
http://code.google.com/apis/adwords/docs/developer/adwords_api_report_contentplacement.html
Best,
- Eric Koleda, AdWords
Hi,
There is no equivalent method in v2009, but it could be that you don't
need this functionality anymore. LBAs have been replaced by
LocationExtensions, and they work a bit differently. More information
can be found here:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com/2009/12/discover-v2009-location-extens
Hi,
This is the intended behavior of the API. When you set a field to
null you are indicating that you don't want to change the value of the
field. If you want to set the end date to "No end date" you need to
use the special date 20371230. This information hasn't been
transferred into the new v
Hi Tegan,
It is not possible to create a campaign with a conversion optimizer
bidding strategy. If you want to use the conversion optimizer for a
campaign you need to use a bidding transition. This currently isn't
well documented, and I'll work on that.
Best,
- Eric Koleda, AdWords API Team
On
Hi,
The TargetingIdeaService does not return estimated CPC values. This
can be done using the TrafficEstimatorService, which hasn't yet been
migrated to v2009.
Best,
- Eric Koleda, AdWords API Team
On Feb 25, 4:49 am, Evgeniy Bogdanov wrote:
> Hi.
> I didn't found the way to get Cost-per-Click
Hi,
Please see my response on this other thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api/browse_thread/thread/44c55eb99e791b06/
Best,
- Eric Koleda, AdWords API Team
On Feb 25, 5:14 am, Liudas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how to change endDate field to "No End Date" value for existing
> campaign?
>
And this one as well:
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api/browse_thread/thread/172bc7890262599a/
Best,
- Eric
On Feb 26, 10:40 am, AdWords API Advisor
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please see my response on this other thread:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api/browse_thread/thread/44c
Hi,
The v13 AccountService has not yet been migrated to the v2009 API. In
the mean time you will need to use the v13 AccountService for this
functionality.
Best,
- Eric Koleda, AdWords API Team
On Feb 25, 9:56 am, iugouruguay wrote:
> Hello, I am migrating an application which used v13 of apil
Hi Ido,
A company is only permitted to have one developer token. That token
can be used across all of your MCC accounts.
Best,
- Eric Koleda, AdWords API Team
On Feb 25, 10:43 am, Idoshilon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any way to accelerate token and application approval
> process ?
> we alreday
Hi everybody.
I need to change urls of my ads. Unfortunately ads are unmutable in
AdGroupAdService(for reason unknown). Is there any way to modify ad
info through API v200909? BulkMutateJobService maybe? Will this
possibility be added anytime soon? Why is it forbidden(it seems
starnge)?
Thanks in
Hi,
I believe the problem is that you are not setting the type of the
criteria object. You either need to set the xsi:type to "Keyword" or
include the field criterionType with the value "Keyword".
1366519735
Keyword
17398960
10
Hi,
The library requires a special version of SOAP::WSDL, as mentioned in
the README. Are you using that same version?
Best,
- Eric
On Feb 25, 12:12 pm, VI wrote:
> Here is the portion of the Perl code:
>
> my $client = Google::AdWords::Client->new({properties_file =>
> 'adwords.proper
Hi Alexander,
Unfortunately I don't have a timeline for when this functionality will
become available.
Best,
- Eric
On Feb 25, 12:41 pm, Alexander Furman wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Thanks for your reply. Do you plan to add this functionality (or maybe
> make a fix?) in current API version or this is
Yes, I downloaded the version of SOAP directly from the link in
README.
On Feb 26, 10:55 am, AdWords API Advisor
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The library requires a special version of SOAP::WSDL, as mentioned in
> the README. Are you using that same version?
>
> Best,
> - Eric
>
> On Feb 25, 12:12 pm, VI
Hi,
This error appears to have been triggered because you included the
budget field in your campaign in addition to the status. It isn't
possible to change the budget of an ended campaign, but if you omit
that field from the request you should be able to set the status.
Best,
- Eric Koleda, AdWo
*(
On Feb 25, 9:40 pm, PPC Awesome wrote:
> The trigger is the adGroupID it says is invalid. The docmentation
> clearly states it's a long. I'm accessing using VB.NET. I'll try
> using a CDbl to see if it works, but that would be VERY weird.
>
> From the API Docs:
>
> adGroupId xsd:long The a
Hi Mike,
I just ran some tests to confirm the behavior, and this is how it
works:
- The FailureResult will always be the first result in a batch of
results. Batches are currenlty 50 operations, so if the operation
stream has more than 50 operations there may be additional
FailureResults later on
Hi,
As the fieldPath indicates, the problem here is that the API server
isn't recognizing the type of the operand field. In your request the
xsi:type of the operand is "namesp19:BiddableAdGroupCriterion", but
namesp19 prefix is never defined in document (neither is the soap
prefix). Please ensur
Hi Scott,
The AdGroupBids.Type field is read only and ignored in requests:
http://code.google.com/apis/adwords/v2009/docs/reference/CampaignService.AdGroupBids.html#AdGroupBids.Type
To specify the type you need to set the xsi:type attribute on the
field, which is accomplished by creating a Ma
Hi Doug,
This report will also return placements. The field that distinguishes
the criterion type is kwType ("Keyword" vs "Website").
Best,
- Eric Koleda, AdWords API Team
On Feb 25, 5:13 pm, doug s wrote:
> I am thinking the answer is no, but wanted to confirm.
>
> If they are, then how can w
Hi,
There are plans to improve the selector functionality, but I don't
have a timeline at this point. Stay tuned!
Best,
- Eric Koleda, AdWords API Team
On Feb 25, 8:07 pm, pmac72 wrote:
> When I first saw the *Selector classes in v2009 I was hoping that
> status would eventually be added to th
Hi Harut,
Which environment are you using? There is a known issue in the
sandbox where Keyword reports aren't validated correctly with the
DayOfWeek aggregation. Unfortunately I don't have a timeline for when
this will be resolved.
Best,
- Eric Koleda, AdWords API Team
On Feb 26, 3:25 am, harr
Hi Suraiya,
Unfortunately I don't have a concrete Perl example. You just need to
add all three search parameters into an array, and then set the
searchParameters field to that array.
my $selector = Google::AdWords::v200909::Types::TargetingIdeaSelector-
>new({
requestType => 'IDEAS',
paging
Ah, I see it now... thanks
On Feb 26, 11:40 am, AdWords API Advisor
wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> This report will also return placements. The field that distinguishes
> the criterion type is kwType ("Keyword" vs "Website").
>
> Best,
> - Eric Koleda, AdWords API Team
>
> On Feb 25, 5:13 pm, doug s wro
Hi,
There is a known issue where proximityTargets aren't processed
correctly for traffic estimation. I don't believe this problem will
be fixed in the near term, so I would recommend you look into other
geo targeting options.
Best,
- Eric Koleda, AdWords API Team
On Feb 26, 5:49 am, Mariya wro
Hi Eric,
It does not work. Basically doing so throws exception. I tried that
couple of times without any success and that's why I have been looking
for a Perl example that works.
The code for the SerachParameter type class might be incomplete.
Thanks for your time and reply.
Suraiya
--
You recei
For example, you can either use the 'REMOVE' operand on the
BiddableAdGroupCriterion object or change the userStatus to 'DELETED'.
Same question also applies for Adgroup objects.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"AdWords API Forum" group.
To post to t
When I tried to use the Google adwords java api, I instantiated an
AdwordsUser object by:
new AdWordsUser(email,password,userAgent,devToken);
The instantiation is successful; however when I tried to use any of
the services I get this exception:
AxisFault
faultCode: {http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/s
Per the instructions in the google-api-adwords-perl/README file I have
done the following:
1) download SOAP::WSDL from
http://soap-wsdl.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/soap-wsdl/SOAP-WSDL/branches/Typemap.tar.gz?view=tar&pathrev=846
2) patch the SOAP::WSDL using bin/soap_wsdl_patches.pl /path/to/
down
Hi,
I am trying to update a campaign using API v2009.
Its giving me range error - buget.amountRangeErrorTooLow.
I could not find any details on the error and dont know whats wrong.
Basically I am just changing the status of the campaign from Active to
Pause and not changing any daily budget amoun
Hi,
I am using v13 version of google adwords api. I saw a strange
behavior when i use radius around zipcode feature of the api to
provide custom targeting. If I provide a zipcode of 28213 and radius
of 60 miles (and translating to meters as it is required in api).
When I update the campaign, th
Hi,
Thanks for the great feedback. We've discussed the idea of including
the English error descriptions in the ApiError object, but in most
cases we don't think this is that useful and not appropriate for
application in other languages.
Best,
- Eric
On Feb 26, 6:40 am, Zweitze wrote:
> Another
How about this - provide an API service that simply accepts a target
language and returns an XML doc (or CSV, I don't really care but think
that XML would be better suited to the international usage) containing
the error codes and a translated string and any other information on
the nature of the e
42 matches
Mail list logo
