Hello,
Thanks for your patience on this issue. I see you have posted recently on the
private thread. To simplify communication and limit any confusion, please allow
us to limit any back and forth to the private thread, for now. At the moment,
this issue is still being processed internally. As s
Hi!
Thanks for the heads up. We're really waiting for at least some information
(Is this an issue on Google's end, or did *we* mess something up so bad?
Will it be corrected? Will it be corrected in an upcoming version only?
When is that likely due? Should we rewrite everything to use bare muta
Hi Antoni,
The other user of this forum thread has provided their API transaction logs
privately and our team is currently investigating it. Unfortunately, our team
haven't received any updates yet. However, so that I can also discuss the issue
that you encountered with the rest of the team, pl
Hi!
Any updates on this?
wtorek, 9 marca 2021 o 17:38:26 UTC+1 Prototype.co napisał(a):
> I have sent the log file to the e-mail address specified. Please get back
> to us with any information on why it is not possible to use temporary IDs
> with extensions.
>
> Thank you for your help!
>
> O
I have sent the log file to the e-mail address specified. Please get back
to us with any information on why it is not possible to use temporary IDs
with extensions.
Thank you for your help!
On Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 7:54:50 AM UTC+1 adsapiforumadvisor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please try to send the
Hi,
Please try to send the requested details on this email alias
googleadsapi-supp...@google.com instead for privacy purposes.
Regards,
Ernie John Blanca Tacata
Google Ads API Team
ref:_00D1U1174p._5004Q2DJguC:ref
--
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blo
I have the customer ID, request ID, request and response logs ready, but I
do not have permission to reply privately to author in this topic. Seeing
that this is not possible, and that I shouldn't expose the entire log to
the public, how should I send it to you for investigation?
On Monday, Mar
Hi,
Thank you for sharing these details. I had to remove some of your earlier
responses since it contained snippets of your logs.
Moving forward, apart from the batch IDs, our team would also require the
complete request and response logs, with the request-id, to further investigate.
If loggin
I'm not sure if this is what you are looking for, but here goes:
*Created a batch job with resource name
"customers/2104968634/batchJobs/4491543813"*
*2 mutate operations have been added so far.*
*Next sequence token for adding next operations is
8cee755324c320bd713f697842ec5b47*
*Batch job with
Hi All,
Thanks for providing this additional information. Can you please reproduce this
issue and share with us:
customer ID
request ID
request and response logs
With this extra information, we can examine the issue more closely.
Thanks,
Matt
Google Ads API Team
Matt
Google Ads API Team
ref:_
Hello Matt,
here is my comment from the Python client library GitHub issue:
*
Same issue here. In fact, I can confirm it's not only Sitelinks, but other
extensions as well (my example uses Promotion Extensions).
*Batch job #0 has a status "Field 'resource_name' cannot be modified by
'CREATE
Hello Matt!
Here is the operation:
ad_group_extension_setting_operation { create { extension_type: SITELINK
ad_group: "customers//adGroups/-27" extension_feed_items:
"customers//extensionFeedItems/-34" } }
Looks like it's not just
me
https://github.com/googleads/google-ads-python/issues/386#
Hello,
My name is Matt and I work alongside Ernie. Thanks for providing the errors
from the operation at index, 51. Would it be possible for you to send us the
operation that gave you the error you mentioned?
Thanks,
Matt
Google Ads API Team
Matt
Google Ads API Team
ref:_00D1U1174p._5004Q2DJgu
Unfortunately I can't see how may I get the logs of failed operation within
BatchJob. I've managed to create Sitelink extensions in Batch Job (for some
reason one should specify Temporary IDs in `.id` property of feed item
rather than setting proper `resource_name` which is weird taking into
ac
Hi Antoni,
Thank you for reaching out.
There are no limitations mentioned here, when using temporary IDs for creating
feed items in bulk. Since this is more of an implementation concern using
Python, you may continue discussion with the Python client library owners
instead in the Github issue
Hi! Is that possible to create sitelinks and assign them into ad group in
the same Batch Job?
it looks like I cannot use temporary IDs for feed items?
What should I do differently to create feed items and assign into ad group
in a single Batch Job then?
Please take a look at code examples h
16 matches
Mail list logo
