Hello Oliver,
Could you do me a huge favor and start a new forum thread for this? It's a
pretty old thread, so it may be a slightly different problem. You can
reference this thread in your new post.
Thanks,
Nadine, Google Ads API Team
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find u
We're also seeing this issue in the Placement Performance Report i.e. 2
rows for the same placement (in same camapign ID). However, in our case,
both rows don't have a criterion ID which, according to the documentation
of this report, mean that both rows are automatic placements. We're
puzzle
Hi Christian,
Could you please provide me with the SOAP XML report definition and the
downloaded report so that I can look into this issue further? Also, could
you please provide more details on when this criteria was added as a
managed placement? Please click on *Reply privately to author *whe
Hi Vishal,
thanks for investigating this issue. The hints about distinguishing managed
vs. automatic placements say that automatic placements have no ID (but 2
dashes). In the report seen here, however, both rows have a real ID. So I
do not see how we to tell them apart.
Regards,
Christian
On
Hi Christian,
Placement Performance Report returns rows for both automatic and managed
placements. I checked and found out that the row with 513 impressions
belong to the managed placements category whereas the row with 2
impressions belongs to the automatic placements category. To distinguish
Hi,
today we encountered duplicates in a few placement performance reports. We
use these reports for a long time now and did not see the problem before.
We've seen that for 4 customers now. The duplicates always related to the
date 2017-03-02. Here is an example:
| Day| Ad group ID | C
