Re: Auto-Migration of Feed-Based Extensions

Thanks for you response. One follow-up question. In the response to question #2 you stated that AssetService and the call asset is supported in v10 but in the question I stated I was in v9. The docs look the same for v9 and v10 for those. Are creating call assets not supported in v9 of AssetSer

Auto-Migration of Feed-Based Extensions

Hey Team, I have a few question around the migration from feed-based to asset based extensions, specifically around call extensions going to asset-based extensions. I have seen a couple docs that seem to be unclear as to timings. This doc "https://ads-developers.googleblog.com/2021/05/feed-b

Re: Auto-Migration of Feed-Based Extensions

Hello Nick, Thanks for getting back to us. Yes, you can refer to the results from the asset services as an alternative to determine if the migration has taken into place. With regard to your concern on the possibility wherein a user can create an asset extension in the UI prior to the migratio

Re: Auto-Migration of Feed-Based Extensions

Thank you for the reply here Peter! This helps me out with preparing for the migration. In regards to your answers on questions 2 and 3... so it sounds like we can rely on the presence of results from the asset services to indicate that the migration has taken place. Is that fair? I was concern

RE: Auto-Migration of Feed-Based Extensions

Hi Nick, Thank you for sending over these questions. I also noticed that you sent a separate email to our (googleadsapi-supp...@google.com) alias. However, allow me to discuss the items here instead for visibility to other customers. You may refer below for my responses : 1) The blog post ment

Auto-Migration of Feed-Based Extensions

Hey team, I have a few questions around the migration from feed-based to asset-based extensions that I have not found answers for in the migration guide or blog posts. I'd appreciate any clarity you can provide on the below... 1) The blog post