Hi,
Can you verify that a policy error would be thrown if you added that same ad
without validateOnly enabled?
Best,
- Eric Koleda, AdWords API Team
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
http://groups.g
Is anyone knows the answer?
On Sep 20, 12:19 pm, sheinmus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to use validateOnly flag. But I found out that punctuation and
> symbols checked only as shown
> herehttp://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/static.py?hl=en&guide=130814...
> But stop words are not checked (porn
Hi,
I tried to use validateOnly flag. But I found out that punctuation and
symbols checked only as shown here
http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/static.py?hl=en&guide=1308145&topic=1310862&page=guide.cs&answer=176095&rd=2
But stop words are not checked (porn etc.)
Here's request. I decided
Hi,
The answer is yes, as Anash mentioned you can use the the validateOnly flag
to check for any policy violations before the Ad itself gets into the
system, the system will not block your account for sending many violating
Ads if using the validateOnly flag, then you can filter out the Ads wit
Hello,
Thank you for the answer.
But I mean another thing. I can do this validation on my server.
I want to avoid blocking my account. For example I add an ad with a
bad information: porn or other. Ad expects for review then.
Can I filter these ads before they were added to adwords?
On Sep 13, 12
Hi,
You could use the validateOnly header to check if an ad violates policies.
See
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com/2009/12/discover-v2009-validateonly-header.html
and
http://code.google.com/p/google-api-adwords-php/source/browse/trunk/examples/v201101/HandlePolicyViolationError.php
for
detail
I want to allow users to create ads in adwords via api. But I am
unable to review ads. I read that paused ads are moderated too. Google
can block the account after several warnings if the ads do not pass
the google policy.
Is it possible to do pre-review in the automatic mode to filter
obviously in
