Hi Teja,
Thanks for the quick response.But we develop a campaign manager solution
with google Ads API.and planning to give multiple user accouts for
advertisers.Wondering how to handle the payments of them and what type of
payment method is available for adwords API agency?
Please help
Thanks
We are developing a solution integrating adwords API The solution will be
for a Mobile Operators and Telco service providers in country, to provide
web and InApp Ad publishing for their enterprise customers through their
digital Ad Portal, which is a product done by us. We want to identify what
the
notion of just a Parent criteria. What this new criteria is, where I might
see it, and how I might use it is unclear to me. Can someone shed some
light on this for me?
Thanks a bunch!
mm
--
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our bl
stType set to "User List". Is
this expected? If so, what are these and why don't they have a specific
list type? This is using the java client (2.7.0).
Thanks a bunch -
mm
--
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsd
Correct value... FinalUrls, FinalMobileUrls & CustomUrlParameters are being
returned in JSON format in V201509
- https://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/reference/#misc-reporting
On Thursday, January 7, 2016 at 1:57:48 AM UTC-6, 照沼領 wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> I'm migrating API version from v20
ter adding
"definition.setIncludeZeroImpressions(true);", all of the partitions appear
to have been returned.
Is there a reason that the selector seems to be ignored for this report?
Thanks -
mm
--
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and G
e keywords with non-null
tracking templates
On Tuesday, August 4, 2015 at 11:22:11 AM UTC-5, mm wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
> I need to retrieve all keywords with a non-null tracking template (because
> I need to clear them out). However, so far I am having a little difficulty
> discovering
template. I then tried
"Not equals null", but that isn't a valid selector (an attempt with that
throws SelectorError.MISSING_PREDICATE_VALUES ).
What is the trick to this that I'm missing?
Thanks a bunch -
mm
--
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also fin
Hey there Nadine -
Any update on this issue?
Thanks -
mm
On Tuesday, July 7, 2015 at 10:11:22 AM UTC-5, Nadine Sundquist (AdWords
API Team) wrote:
>
> Hello Margaret,
>
> I see what you're saying. Thanks for clarifying. I'm going to contact some
> of the people who we
SitelinkTrackingUrl
URL
false
ENABLED
ADWORDS
And the mapping:
11257715
11061395
1
ENABLED
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
On Monday, July 6, 2015 at 3:28:14 PM UTC-5, mm wrote:
>
> Hey Nadine -
> Yeah, I noticed my other feeds were auto-modified, but this feed was
> modified differently. The fina
s 859-816-5283, the feedId is 11061395 and the mappingId is 11257715.
Thanks -
mm
On Monday, July 6, 2015 at 3:16:44 PM UTC-5, Nadine Sundquist (AdWords API
Team) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Check out this blog post on Easier Upgraded URL migration with Feed and
> FeedMapping mo
bileUrl of type URL
rather than URL_LIST. The active mapping for it doesn't have a mapping for
the upgraded url attributes at all. Can I get some help with how to
migrate these sitelinks? The client customer id is 859-816-5283, the feedId
is 11061395 and the mappingId is 11257715.
Thanks a bunch, Josh!
On Wednesday, July 1, 2015 at 10:35:02 AM UTC-5, Josh Radcliff (AdWords API
Team) wrote:
>
> Hi mm,
>
> We recently updated the documentation for DynamicSearchAd
> <https://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/reference/v201506/AdGroupAdService.Dyna
Hey Juergen,
asAdlucentSitelinks is semantically the same as the getSiteLinksFromFeed
method in that sample code you linked to (that code is actually probably
clearer than mine)
-mm
On Monday, June 29, 2015 at 12:59:34 PM UTC-5, Juergen Henning wrote:
>
> Hey Margaret,
>
> can you
uot;Found "+page.getTotalNumEntries()+" sitelinks");
while (page.getEntries() != null) {
allAdlSitelinks.addAll(asAdlucentSitelinks(acctId, mapping,
page.getEntries()));
start = start+pageSize;
paging.setStartIndex(start);
page = feedService.get(selector);
}
return allAdlSitelink
paign).
Thanks for your help!
mm
--
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
You received this message because yo
template appears to be working fine - even for DSA's. However, my DSA tests
are a sample size of one at this point, so I'm still wary :)
-mm
On Wednesday, June 17, 2015 at 5:22:45 PM UTC-5, Josh Radcliff (AdWords API
Team) wrote:
>
> Hi mm,
>
> I'm still trying to get
Hey Josh -
Any update on this? We're moving into our upgrade process & would sure
appreciate it if we could get a resolution on this.
Thanks!
mm
On Monday, June 8, 2015 at 9:09:08 AM UTC-5, Josh Radcliff (AdWords API
Team) wrote:
>
> Hi mm,
>
> Thanks for sending over
Sure - here's one:
000517c860f796900abfa015f100fce8
I can certainly generate more if needed!
On Friday, June 5, 2015 at 3:54:51 PM UTC-5, Josh Radcliff (AdWords API
Team) wrote:
>
> Hi mm,
>
> Would you happen to have the request IDs from the failed attempts at
>
matic that I could have a template at a
higher level that isn't considered valid at lower levels.
Thanks -
mm
--
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.google.com/+Go
; Regards,
> Mike, AdWords API Team
>
> On Monday, May 11, 2015 at 6:50:43 PM UTC-4, mm wrote:
>>
>> Alas, that doesn't work, either, Michael. I tried every permutation I
>> could come up with:
>> bagc.setFinalMobileUrls(null);
>>
>> bagc.setFi
Hey Hunter -
I was thinking of them like url parameters and just didn't expect them to
be case-insensitive (wasn't treating them that way). I'll update my logic
to accommodate. I also didn't quite grok the use of doReplace - that looks
like it will simplify my code nic
y
promocode
DistinctError.DUPLICATE_ELEMENT
DistinctError
DUPLICATE_ELEMENT
Is this a bug, or are customParameters really case insensitive?
Thanks -
mm
--
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
(null);
bagc.setFinalMobileUrls(new UrlList(new String[]));
Regardless of which of these I tried, the soap message contains the same
url chunk:
so they all return UrlError.MISSING_PROTOCOL
And, not surprisingly, it happens for both finalUrls and finalMobileUrls
-mm
On Monday, M
gt;
> Try changing this line:
> bagc.setFinalMobileUrls(null);
>
> To this:
> bagc.setFinalMobileUrls(new UrlList(new String[]));
>
> If this still fails, let me know and I can look into it further.
>
> Regards,
> Mike, AdWords API Team
>
> On Thursday, May 7, 2015 at 8:0
UrlError.MISSING_PROTOCOL
UrlError
MISSING_PROTOCOL
Is there some other way I should be indicating that there are no
finalMobileUrls?
Thanks -
mm
--
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our bl
to
check.
Thanks a bunch -
mm
--
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
You received this message
Any update on this Anash? This would be particularly helpful as we ugrade
our accounts to ensure that all the new url pieces ultimately resolves to
the previous destUrl
On Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 8:10:51 PM UTC-5, HK wrote:
>
> I like mm's suggestion. Ideally, there would be an api where you
Josh -
What is the expected latency for data in the Shopping Performance report?
In my experience, it seems to belong on the bucket with placements/search
terms/geographic... if so, could the doc be updated to reflect that?
Thanks -
mm
On Monday, March 30, 2015 at 11:46:29 AM UTC-5, Josh
Realistically, a UI is not particularly useful at scale - it would be more
useful to have an api for retrieving an entity's fully resolved URL
On Tuesday, April 14, 2015 at 1:47:10 PM UTC-5, Anash P. Oommen (AdWords
API Team) wrote:
>
> Hi Hans,
>
> That's a UI feature request; could you open a
aller pieces and
repeat the process with those.
HTH -
mm
On Tuesday, March 24, 2015 at 6:39:03 AM UTC-5, Joel wrote:
>
> Seeing this repeatedly, but just one 1 single account. Last time this
> occurred it was due to a server-side reporting problem - are reports
> experiencing a proble
Hey guys -
I'm pulling a Campaign Location Target Report for an account and I'm seeing
multiple rows returned with "--" as the locationId. I only see this when I
request metrics - if I pull a 0-impression report, these rows don't show
up.
How should that be in
(part.getCaseValue() instanceof ProductCanonicalCondition) {
.
}
HTH -
mm
On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 7:25:46 AM UTC-5, Ads Developer wrote:
>
> Hi Ray,
>
> Any update on this.
>
> On Friday, August 22, 2014 10:18:00 AM UTC+5:30, Ads Developer wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ray,
x27;s performance
data, so the reports are generally of reasonable size. Is there any other
way to handle these besides wait/retry?
Thanks -
mm
--
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.googl
r other objects and
it works great.
HTH -
mm
On Tuesday, August 19, 2014 8:12:00 AM UTC-5, Aswini wrote:
>
> Hi Josh,
>
> I followed 1st way ( AdGroupAdService.get
> <https://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/reference/v201406/AdGroupAdService#get>
> ).
> Throu
turned from the ConstantDataService.
Any idea what these values are, Josh? If we can decipher that, this is
actually pretty useful.
Thanks -
mm
On Thursday, May 1, 2014 2:03:25 AM UTC-5, Igor Schut wrote:
>
> Hi Josh,
>
> Thanks for looking in to this.
>
> The Shopping Pe
the data returned
would be just for the date range specified in the report definition?
Thanks!
mm
--
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts
gt; did not check whether it works as advertized.
>
>
>
> On Monday, March 3, 2014 11:51:15 PM UTC+1, mm wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Anash -
>> I'm afraid I don't understand how I can properly determine in my code
>> when I can set a content bid for an
way for me to
determine when it is acceptable to set the content bid for an adgroup?
Thanks -
mm
On Monday, March 3, 2014 4:44:12 PM UTC-6, Anash P. Oommen (AdWords API
Team) wrote:
>
> Hi Margaret,
>
> Campaign type is not exposed in AdWords API yet, that's why you are unable
Hey Guys -
I was making revisions to our code to accommodate the new rules for setting
content bids for adgroups. However, when testing this I ran into a dilemma.
I wanted to test a case where it was valid to set the content bid, so I
went into my test account and created a campaign with "Search
Hey Chris -
I believe that the limit is on the number of values you are using in the
selector, not the number of entities that it will match. So in your case,
if your request is for a report for a single campaign, then you shouldn't
need to page at all. Also, it appears that this limitation is j
Hey guys -
I have a couple of questions about the GeoPerformanceReport - first, is
this returning to me only information about locations I have specifically
targeted, or is it returning to me geo data for all the activity in the
account? Secondly, I have included "MostSpecificCriteriaId" in my r
Hey Josh -
Yes, in this case there is a FeedMapping, and I am getting
FeedItemValidationDetails, but no ApprovalStatus. I'll try to capture the
appropriate Soap logs for you and post them as well, if that is useful.
Thanks!
mm
On Friday, November 22, 2013 10:24:25 AM UTC-6, Josh Rad
Still curious about whether or not null approvalStatus values are expected.
I did finally locate the error doc -
https://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/appendix/feed-errors
On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 9:10:02 AM UTC-6, mm wrote:
>
> Hey guys -
> I'm attempting t
can I find this information?
Thanks!
mm
--
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
You received this message
FWIW, when moving to v201309, I discovered that I needed to include
commons-httpclient-3.1.jar in order to have ClientLoginTokens support
working. It was not included in the dependencies for the v201309 axis java
client.
Cheers -
mm
On Friday, November 1, 2013 5:37:49 AM UTC-5, Sheo Ohm
Hey guys -
I am also seeing this error, but I am using the v201309 java client library
(old library). This prevents our being able to move to v201309.
Thanks!
mm
On Friday, October 11, 2013 6:26:33 AM UTC-5, GrueneOrchidee wrote:
>
> I want to get all campaigns of one customer. Therefor
Thanks for your reply Paul. In this case, the Campaign is already ACTIVE,
and the CampaignFeed is DELETED. When I attempt to SET the status of the
CampaignFeed to ACTIVE, I receive the
CampaignFeedError.CANNOT_OPERATE_ON_DELETED_CAMPAIGN_FEED error.
Thanks -
mm
On Wednesday, October 9, 2013
Any help with this, guys?
On Thursday, October 3, 2013 4:04:13 PM UTC-5, mm wrote:
>
>
> Hey guys -
> I have a case where I have added some enhanced sitelinks to a campaign.
> Then I went into the adwords UI and disassociated all sitelinks from that
> campaign. Now I want to
gnFeed for that campaign and those sitelinks and
that fails with CampaignFeedError.CANNOT_ADD_ALREADY_EXISTING_CAMPAIGN_FEED.
So now I am really at a loss - how can I associate a sitelink with a
Campaign with the api after all previous sitelinks were disassociated via
the U
w to hack it
in if it's on the way...
Thanks!
mm
On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 11:04:21 AM UTC-6, Emmanuel Espina wrote:
>
> Thanks Kevin
>
> If it were toggleable it would be very easy to confirm what we speculate:
> the slowest part of the uploading process is the network
FWIW, we are also seeing this error - can supply additional Request ID's if
that is useful
Thanks -
mm
On Tuesday, September 3, 2013 9:35:16 AM UTC-5, fr...@bgenius.com wrote:
>
> Hi Takeshi,
>
> We also seem to be experiencing this issue.
> We have a client account th
I believe valid values are from -1 through 3 in .1 increments. So as
examples: -1 is effectively -100%, or don't bid on mobile at all; -.2 would
be bid 80% of the base bid; 0 = just use the bid; .5 bid at 150%.
HTH -
mm
On Thursday, May 9, 2013 2:22:43 AM UTC-5, Oliver wrote:
>
> I&
Hey Israel -
Negatives can also be campaign-level... but in that case you use a
NegativeCampaignCriterion
HTH -
mm
On Tuesday, December 25, 2012 3:00:18 PM UTC-6, israel epstein wrote:
>
> I must admit at the outset that I am a bit of a neewb at this, but I have
> been struggling with
;;
xsi:type="ns2:EntityNotFound">
EntityNotFound.INVALID_ID
EntityNotFound
INVALID_ID
On Thursday, January 17, 2013 1:35:13 AM UTC-6, Takeshi Hagikura (AdWords
API Team) wrote:
>
> Hell
valid.
Has anyone had any success using the TrafficEstimator for existing
Campaigns/AdGroups/Keywords? The only examples I have seen are for new
campaigns & adgroups.
Thanks a bunch -
mm
--
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
Hey guys -
I am trying to pull the disapprovalReasons for a bunch of disapproved
keywords. What I am seeing is that out of about a dozen disapproved
keywords, only 4 return a disapprovalReason. I found that surprising, so
thought I would double check - is this expected?
Thanks!
mm
succeeded. So I believe that the
notion of 'don't use the sandbox for load testing' extends to the volume of
data you attempt to create in each call also. It would be nice to get a more
appropriate error, but it's not clear where/how to file a bug report for the
Hey Guys -
Is this on the roadmap for an upcoming release?
Thanks -
mm
On Friday, June 8, 2012 1:26:54 AM UTC-5, Oliver wrote:
>
> Many thanks Daniel.
>
> On Thursday, June 7, 2012 12:38:45 PM UTC+1, Danial Klimkin wrote:
>>
>> Hello Oliver,
>>
>>
>> Ne
Hey Anash -
Has the old java client library been updated to support this? It didn't
previously.
Thanks -
mm
On Thursday, August 23, 2012 11:21:41 AM UTC-5, Oliver wrote:
>
> The best practices guidelines recommends compressing the SOAP messages.
>
>
> https://developer
Hey Artur -
I don't believe you can do this in one call - and I would not expect the
id's to be the same. Especially if this is a keyword with some historical
data, then even after you delete it, it will still be in the system as a
deleted keyword.
hth -
margaret
On Tuesday, September 11, 2012
Hey Laura -
The KeywordId field in the Search Query Performance report is not just for
Keywords - from the doc:"The ID can be for any type of criterion, including
placements, verticals, etc. Cross-reference with the Criteria Report to
determine the criteria type and details." - so in this case,
Hey Paul -
I think that you can get what you want from a Criteria Performance report
with a selector that limits the returned values to criteria of type
"Product" -
hth -
margaret
On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 8:41:01 AM UTC-5, Paul Groetzner wrote:
>
> At the moment, we are downloading repo
Hey Reed -
No difference - you can update the two of them with the same code if you
use BiddableAdGroupCriterion...
hth -
margaret
On Tuesday, September 4, 2012 9:18:53 AM UTC-5, Reed wrote:
>
> Maybe a odd question, but: Is there any difference between the API call I
> would make to change t
Additionally, we're getting a lot of 0-legth reports. Guys, what's up???
On Friday, August 10, 2012 9:59:13 AM UTC-5, mm wrote:
>
> A bit more info - we're also seeing it for SearchQueryPerformace reports
>
> On Friday, August 10, 2012 9:27:18 AM UTC-5, mm wrote:
>
A bit more info - we're also seeing it for SearchQueryPerformace reports
On Friday, August 10, 2012 9:27:18 AM UTC-5, mm wrote:
>
> Hey guys -
> I am seeing this problem with multiple (but not all) accounts this
> morning. I am requesting reports in gzipped csv format, but am ge
Hey guys -
I am seeing this problem with multiple (but not all) accounts this morning.
I am requesting reports in gzipped csv format, but am getting just csv.
This is happening for KeywordPerformance and CriteriaPerformance reports.
Known issue? Fix forthcoming?
Thanks -
mm
n is of the form "Places Ads_someNumber"
... is this a viable way to identify these campaigns? Is there any other
way to identify these campaigns?
Thanks a bunch -
mm
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://ad
Oliver -
Use a predicate for Impressions >= 0; this seems to return all entities
regardless of the value of the includeZeroImpressions flag.
HTH -
mm
On Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:10:27 AM UTC-5, Oliver wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> What is the best way to synchronize our local data
ot;Product listing ad;
Promotion: ". While I can parse this for now as a workaround, I'd sure
rather have the column available to me. This is with the v201109 java
client library. Is this a known issue, or is there a workaround?
Thanks -
mm
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
d 201109_1 jars in my
classpath. What am I missing here?
Thanks!
mm
On Tuesday, May 22, 2012 8:45:07 AM UTC-5, Kevin Winter wrote:
>
> Hi Val,
> There are few structural differences between v201109_1 and v201109 -
> this biggest difference is changing the version. v201109_1 java e
implementation.
Best -
mm
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
You received this message because you are subscribed to
arity with
what's available in the UI... alas, I shall have to attack this problem
from another direction.
Thanks, Pete!
-mm
On Thursday, March 22, 2012 10:20:19 AM UTC-5, Pete Lavetsky (AdWords API
Guru) wrote:
>
> Also, there's a long list of features that have not achieved par
t a subset of the reported keywords.
-mm
On Wednesday, March 21, 2012 12:20:25 PM UTC-5, Pete Lavetsky (AdWords API
Guru) wrote:
>
> KeywordId isn't a valid Predicate for SearchQueryReport, but CampaignId
> and AdGroupId are.
>
> 1) Do you definitely have stats for the C
gle.com/apis/adwords/docs/reference/latest/ReportDefinitionService.Predicate.html
>
> for details on predicates.
>
> Cheers,
> Anash P. Oommen,
> AdWords API Advisor.
>
> On Tuesday, 20 March 2012 00:03:43 UTC+5:30, mm wrote:
>>
>> Hey guys -
>> Using the adwords web interfa
Well, runs fine might be over stating it - I don't get an exception, but
the report is empty. In addition to KeywordId, I had also added CampaignId
and AdGroupId predicate, so those don't appear to be respected either.
On Monday, March 19, 2012 1:33:43 PM UTC-5, mm wrote:
>
> He
Hey guys -
Using the adwords web interface, I am able to select a subset of keywords
and then request the search queries related to those keywords for a given
timeframe. I am trying to duplicate that report via the API, but when I add
the KeywordId predicate to the report definition, I get "HTTP
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!searchin/adwords-api/campaign$20criteria/adwords-api/r35DPa1jz7Q/MzZaWAnf3hEJ
On Tuesday, March 6, 2012 9:57:47 AM UTC-6, mmasters wrote:
>
>
> I'm currently setting 'Desktop' and 'Tablet'. The following shows the soap
> request. When I look at the UI,
Hey Chris -
I also ran into this discrepancy and asked the team about it in one of
the last few hangouts & they confirmed that it is the expected (though
arguably odd) behavior.
Best -
Margaret
On Feb 21, 8:15 am, Chris wrote:
> While testing some of the v201109 functionality regarding the
> swi
ssion here:
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api/browse_thread/thread/af7e433dad63cfb4/1a8f5a901fe2ef86?lnk=gst&q=campaign+platform#1a8f5a901fe2ef86
HTH -
mm
On Feb 8, 9:11 am, nachomac wrote:
> Basically I want to target just PCs and Tablets, but I'm unable to do
> it.
>
>
Hey Robert -
It is not very intuitive, but as you have already discovered, when a
campaign is created it has all 3 platform targets associated with it.
This means that after creating a campaign what you have to do is
remove the targets that you don't want rather than add the targets
that you do.
T
Hey David -
Where's the issue tracker?
Thanks -
mm
On Jan 17, 12:36 pm, David Bonner wrote:
> Yeah, we do the same approach pretty much everywhere, and after switching
> to 15.x, campaign creation fails with a name collision, presumably because
> validateOnly is being ignored.
instead
HTH -
mm
On Jan 17, 3:58 am, K D wrote:
> One way is to look at code of reportUtils.downloadReport which will
> allow downloading of report without reportID, is there any other way
> (downloading using reportID)?
>
> On Jan 17, 4:01 pm, K D wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
Oh, interesting... have you tried it with partialFailure=true for
these requests?
On Jan 16, 6:45 pm, Peter wrote:
> Hey mm,
>
> Yeah this was working before. I did afew follow up tests and it looks
> like validateOnly doesn't work period. I tested both add, delete and
r
than a policy exception, so I would probably just perform those
allowing for partial failures and then noting the failures. Agree that
if it is "validate only", it should be... just looking to work around
it...
HTH -
mm
On Jan 15, 9:19 pm, Peter wrote:
> Hey AdWords Team,
>
now where it won't return data for zero-impressions. The
suggested work-around is to use a CampaignPerformanceReport to
retrieve this data right now, and you can get the AccountCurrencyCode
with it also.
HTH -
mm
On Jan 12, 10:18 am, sms_adwords wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying t
e (I only care about Language, Location and Platform
criterion), the Platform criterion seem to be the only ones that are
defaulted like this.
-mm
On Jan 12, 12:27 pm, jstedman
wrote:
> mm,
>
> This is a guess, try using the CampaignCriterion.Type
> NegativeCampaignCriterion for the pl
Ok, I've created a CampaignPerformanceReport which includes the
AccountDescriptiveName
& AccountTimeZoneId. However, the value returned for the AccountTimeZoneId
is 1. How do I interpret that data?
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion grou
campaign via the UI, or request it via the api, it has all 3 platforms
associated with it. Is this a known problem?
Thanks -
mm
mutate SOAP request:
https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/cm/v201109";>
ADD
108081220
https://adwords.google.co
ative, but is there a way to filter them in the
selector & just get one or the other?
On Jan 9, 2:26 pm, mm wrote:
> A related question - how do I specify that the criterion is negative?
> How do I filter for negative campaign criterion? I've scoured the doc
> and am just not
A related question - how do I specify that the criterion is negative?
How do I filter for negative campaign criterion? I've scoured the doc
and am just not seeing an option similar to what is available for
negative keywords.
Thanks -
mm
On Jan 9, 11:30 am, Minh Le wrote:
> Hi Anash,
Hey guys -
As the deadline for the V13 AccountService deprecation approaches,
where are we with the replacement of it's capabilities? As others have
noted, without some account activity, it is impossible to get data
with the AccountPerformanceReport, which makes using it instead a non-
option for u
An obvious question - are both reports in the same format?
When I moved our code from the v13 reports to the 201101, I first
attempted to match the v13 report with the 201101 report, but frankly,
gave up on that and just began to compare the reports to the UI for
verification.
On Jul 11, 8:38 am,
Hey munna -
You have 2 options. When you create your 201101 report definition, an
id for the reportDefinition is returned. You can persist that id and
then use it later to retrieve the report as Sanju describes, or there
is also an api call that will return all of your report definitions.
You can t
While "Deleted is a valid status, I don't believe that you can set the
status of something to "Deleted", I think you actually have to delete
it. After you do, it's status will be returned as "Deleted".
On Jun 27, 4:22 pm, kush
wrote:
> Ya i tried the above method in php. But, it throws
> "Invalid
Hi Pitambari -
I use it when I have many keywords that I want to change in one call.
When partialFailures=false, if one change is bad and errors out, the
entire batch fails. When partialFailures=true, only the 1 with the
error fails.
HTH -
mm
On Jun 22, 10:14 am, Pitambari Parekh
wrote:
>
redicateOperator.IN);
predicate.setValues(new String[]{"ENABLED", "PAUSED",
"DISABLED"} );
predicates[2] = predicate;
selector.setPredicates(predicates);
AdGroupAdPage page = adgroupService.get( selector );
HTH -
mm
On May 6, 7:43 am, &qu
, we get fresh credentials, cache them, and process along. This
has worked great for several years. Today the follow-on login requests
appeared almost uniformly to result in a "CaptchaRequired" exception.
Can you shed some light on what may have changed to cause so many
Captchas no
Gosh, I don't know - did you try it? I'd be fascinated to know if that
works. Given the same problem, I would likely just retrieve all
keywords for the adgroups and filter them out at my end. Maybe that's
a little brute-force, but I've already got that retrieval code
working :)
On Apr 27, 11:38 am
predicate.setValues(new String[]{adGroupId1, adGroupId2,
adGroupId3} );
HTH -
mm
On Apr 26, 3:20 pm, JB wrote:
> I'm having a bit of trouble figuring out how to migrate to the new generic
> selector structure in v201101. Basically I have a method that needs to get a
> large list
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
