itch between campaign
> types?
> Will this change affect just display-only campaigns, or campaigns that
> have both display and search?
>
> Thanks,
> Aradhya
>
> On Wednesday, September 18, 2013 11:25:20 PM UTC+5:30, Steve Wollkind
> wrote:
>>
>> It
Did you scroll to the end. I mean all the way to the end? There's a table that
answers exactly this question. For every from and to combination they tell you
yes or no as to whether the change is allowed.
Please look again.
Steve
--
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also
So, let me first say I realize that this is not an API specific question,
but also as I'm an API user I'm not interested in non-API related answers.
We have a lot of accounts for both organizational and keyword capacity
reasons. We're starting to explore Google's remarketing facilities, but it
It's a bit confusing, but there's a table at the end of this page:
https://support.google.com/adwords/answer/2567043?hl=en
That breaks down exactly what is and is not allowed under the new rules.
Steve
On Wednesday, September 18, 2013 8:21:16 AM UTC-4, Aradhya Tripathi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Accordi
wrote:
>
> We've actually found the Bing API to be extremely frustrating to use
> compared to the AdWords API.
>
> On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 10:43:08 AM UTC-4, Steve Wollkind wrote:
>>
>> Danial, thanks for the reply, I've worked with the AdWords API since
, API version
>change requires to change only one constant in the code.
>
>
> We hope these resources are useful to you and simplify the migration
> process as much possible.
>
> -Danial, AdWords API Team.
>
>
> On Thursday, July 11, 2013 9:48:12 PM UTC+4, Stev
I was in the room at the NYC adwords api seminar when this was discussed at
length so I know I'm not alone and I know this sentiment isn't new, but I
just want to take this moment to once again complain about the ridiculous
pace of API changes and sunsets. No other API I've ever worked with has
gt; AWQL was returning the correct results (as with the power of AWQL it'd be
> easy to select many wrong objects), it'd take 2 requests to perform the
> same action with AWQL.
>
> Regards,
>
> - Paul, AdWords API Team.
>
> On Monday, 22 April 2013 11:15:13 UTC-4,
For example, it would be really nice to be able to delete all keywords from
a campaign that have never had an impression, or not had an impression over
a certain time window, without having to actually make a delete operation
for each one
I'm guessing the answer is "no" but I thought I'd as
I'm trying to understand remarketing via the AdWords API and finding it
more than a little opaque. Is there any sort of guide for setting this up?
Thanks
Steve
--
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
I had trouble getting the xml file to attach, so here it is inline:
# Logfile created on 2013-03-29 10:51:06 -0400 by logger.rb/25413
HTTPI executes HTTP POST using the httpclient adapter
SOAP request:
https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/cm/v201209/MutateJobService
SOAPAction: "mutate", User-A
Hi, I'm still waiting for someone to either confirm or deny that there is
an issue here. I'm attaching two files here, a csv of keywords that fail
when I run them through the mutatejobservice and the log of the soap
request that is generated. I need someone to look at this or have it
escalate
words.
I really need some help with this ASAP.
Steve
On Wednesday, March 27, 2013 7:54:14 AM UTC-4, Steve Wollkind wrote:
>
> There is no response at all. I the xml request goes out and nothing ever
> comes back. I begin to suspect that the request is not actually leaving
> our sy
/response xml logs when the request was hanged?
> If there is a requestId in the response.
> I can query the logs in our side, then at least we can know if the request
> reached the server.
>
> Best,
> - Takeshi, AdWords API Team
>
> On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 12:26:40 AM UTC+9
Monday, March 25, 2013 11:48:55 AM UTC-5, Steve Wollkind wrote:
>>
>> Your campaign won't serve anything until you have both ads and keywords
>> attached to it, so maybe you can just confirm that your targeting has been
>> set without error (query back the campaign s
I tried this on my account and get a RESPONSE_SIZE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED when I
don't include a predicate to narrow it down to a single campaign. Is it
possible you're getting this error and it isn't throwing an exception? I'm
not familiar with the PHP client library. It might be worth throwing a
s
I'm in the process of trying to roll out ads for our recently deployed
Spanish version of our site, and running into an issue.
On the English side, I routinely submit batches of 2500 keywords at a time
to the MutateJobService with no difficulty. I have never had a timeout
doing this. When sub
Your campaign won't serve anything until you have both ads and keywords
attached to it, so maybe you can just confirm that your targeting has been
set without error (query back the campaign state, etc) prior to actually
creating ad groups/ad texts/keywords? Maybe there's some reason this
appro
I was a user of this service as well, and was sad to see it go. I
experimented with the TrafficEstimatorService but found it to be rather
inaccurate.
Steve
On Thursday, March 21, 2013 1:09:02 PM UTC-4, traffic...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I want to ask for any possibility to get SEARC
I've also seen a huge uptick in these errors in the past few days.
Jobs that would reliably run to completion now experience this error
with great frequency. I'm going to look into the possible network
issues, but I am skeptical. We don't experience any similar errors
with any other ssl connectio
20 matches
Mail list logo
