Problem is still happening to me here, as well… FYI, we're using PHP
5.2.4-2ubuntu5.17.
-->Steve Bennett
On Friday, March 21, 2014 3:19:57 AM UTC-4, jaison@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to fetch campaigns in a client account but I get the following
> error:
>
> Failed to load re
Okay... Twice in the last 9 months we've had major Sunsets of API
versions, and in both cases we've had major hassles in the upgrade due to
unexpected changes to the API to remove functionality we depended upon.
That kind of thrashing about has resulted in a lot of instability in our
code and
I should have commented in here with a link to the bug report I later
posted separately where a single keyword was the only thing
failing:
http://code.google.com/apis/adwords/community/?place=msg%2Fadwords-api%2FK-ZbGWQl3Zw%2FXLJ5vrte7dcJ
Possibly that was due to your stats problem, although wh
A quick followup -- I did a quick and dirty test using the PHP 3.0.0
library, and the same thing is happening. So this is a server side
problem, not a client side one. Anyone else? Any ideas? Several of
our daily tasks rely on getting these results and we're effectively dead in
the wate
ustomer ID of the account that are seeing these results
>> in the Ad Performance Report? I'd like to investigate this further.
>>
>> - Kevin Winter
>> AdWords API Team
>>
>> On Monday, March 5, 2012 1:43:30 PM UTC-5, Steve B wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, they
Last night, a bit after 9 PM Pacific time, our TargetingIdeaService calls
began failing consistently with an UNEXPECTED_INTERNAL_API_ERROR. This
did not affect any of our other Adwords API calls - just the
TargetingIdeaService.
Now, we've had periodic failed calls on this in the past, but
guarantee that v13 behavior is still
> possible. (i.e. the product moved in a different direction and v13 didn't
> keep up).
>
> - Kevin Winter
> AdWords API Team
>
> On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 12:14:29 PM UTC-5, Steve B wrote:
>>
>> Alas, that didn't
Still waiting to hear something on this -- bump.
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
You received this message
We couldn't find any official docs which listed these changes, but here's
the ones we found:
- The ctr and convRate1PerClick (formerly convRate) field used to be a
float value ("0.0122") and is now a percentage ("1.22%")
- The precision of the ctr, convRate1PerClick, and avgPosition fields
have no easy
way to distinguish them from the Website rows that I could find, and no way
of finding the URL for the Website rows. These don't seem to be covered
in the docs or any other discussion on the web, as yet. Can anyone from
Google elaborate on this, please?
-->Steve B
--
Alas, that didn't work for me, at least in most cases. I've did a lot of
analysis, cross checking IDs against the v13 report data, and have
discovered they all fall into the following categories.
1) Many of the missing keywords are reported in the v13 keyword report as
domain names, with a
Oops - should add that *definitely* you need a minimum of adgroupid and
keywordid -- I definitely get back entries which are different in this way.
Not sure if campaignid is necessary, but I'm using it to be safe. On
the other hand, while I have no examples of keyword id reuse across
acco
they were reported with a kwType of "Website" in v13.
-->Steve B
>
>
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Wow.
The mind boggles that this could possibly be necessary to work, but given
all the other truly crazy things which we've run into in the process of
this migration, I'm sure it does, and am giving it a shot ASAP.
It's especially confusing why this should be the case, when they have
field
. There
is NO other way to get the keyword text, status, quality score, etc.
I'll also mention that the v13 keyword report *does* seem to include the
missing keywords, so it's a major discrepancy here.
On Saturday, February 25, 2012 3:06:19 PM UTC-5, Steve B wrote:
>
> We
We're running into the very same problem for the Keywords Performance
Report - a small number of keywords are missing in the report, which causes
us problems when we try to cross reference the keyword ID from the Ad
Performance Report.
We've tried a variety of predicates to see if it makes a
We're getting these too - on what seems significantly more than 10% of
calls - more like 25% to 50% of calls in a batch that we do.It's caused
major panic this morning until we figured out what was happening, and is
still causing havok in our processing right now.
I'm spending more time rig
Hi Kevin!
We've run into this exact problem as well. We need the stats on both
the seed keyword AND the keyword ideas generated by it, and now it
appears we'll either have to make two API calls for each keyword
(which is highly inefficient), or we'll have to totally restructure
our code to make
Ouch. We're still using 201008, and I'm not sure when this
behavioral change happened, exactly, but it threw us for a loop as
soon as we noticed it. My first thought was to
IdeaTextMatchesSearchParameter to explicitly include the seed keyword,
but that doesn't seem to work.
While it's a nice t
d - I
think that's a failing of the sandbox - for some reason it ignores
that particular item. (The sandbox for this call is pretty lame, IMHO
- I had to start using the live site before I could figure out
everything correctly...)
-->Steve B
On Jan 17, 12:55 am, Raj wrote:
> Can you pl
20 matches
Mail list logo
