Has anyone seen a scenario like this.
TSM server 5.1.0 running on aix 4.3.3
Standalone 3590E tape rive defined to a manual library roblib00
09/04/03 23:24:00 ANR8325I Dismounting volume 040337-60 minute mount
retention expired.
09/04/03 23:24:41 ANR8469E Dismount
Thanks for the reply Jack, but I'm not getting any read or write errors and its a very
intermittent problem.
I'm wondering if I have sonmeting wrong with my setup of the drive/library definitions.
There's really on library just 3590 autoloaders.
-
Do you Yahoo!?
Thanks for your reply Brenda, but the tape does get ejected from the drive but somehow
TSM is getting confused. Its not really a library so we just go pull the tape out.
But occasionally it goes to unavailable
-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-
Ever get an answer to this one Dale.
I guess it wouldn't bode to well for DD if IBM came right out and stated that
they don't support it?
Hmm
+--
|This was sent by bkupm...@yahoo.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@b
Anyone out here thinking of sending oracle backup data direct to an NFS target?
Care to elaborate?
What is driving the process?
TSM licensing ?
DBA control?
+--
|This was sent by bkupm...@yahoo.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SP
Kevin,
I also think you should take a look at the SEPATON solution.
Highly scalable, and does also provide encryption done in the same hardware
card as its compression.
Integrates easily in TEM environments
+--
|This was sent by
I have a very large client that backs up 70 tb daily with the API to a SEPATON
appliance
+--
|This was sent by bkupm...@yahoo.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+
Chart2: what Vtl are you currently using and what does it cause a lot of
overhead and complexity?
+--
|This was sent by bkupm...@yahoo.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+---
Thomas,
First off, with all the great enhancehancements and current high stability
levels I would recommend going straight to version 6.4
As you have already stated there are certain data types hat are good candidates
for data deduplication and your database backup data definitely is and image
f
