It's apparently out now. We are at the mercy of Tivolis blindingly fast
distribution network.
On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 06:48, West Suhanic wrote:
> Hello All:
>
> Any idea when the TSM server for Linux on an IA32 box will be available?
>
> regards,
> west
Why can't AIX allow the use of the raw devices?
Suad
--
> David Longo
>
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/05/02 07:25AM >>>
> I decided to try using raw disk for database volumes, so I allocated
> some 10GB LUNs off our Shark.
>
> The problem is when I define
To see how many scratch tapes in that pool run;
select count(*) from volumes \
where stgpool_name='TECH_TAPE_POOL' \
and scratch='Yes'
On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 18:20, Steve Harris wrote:
> Murthy
>
> Check the maxscratch parameter on the tech_tape_pool storage pool with q stg
>tech_tape_pool f=d
On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 22:11, Halvorsen Geirr Gulbrand wrote:
> Hi All,
> this sounds good, and I'd like to test it.
> Do you have a link to where the software can be downloaded?
> I couldn't find it on Tivoli's (IBM) ftp site.
You won't find any full releases on the ftp site, only updates. They
h
tely before the upgrade.
Suad
--
On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 08:13, Lisa Cabanas wrote:
> So, Paul, would you recommend 4.2.1.12 as stable? I am at 4.2.1.9 (on AIX)
> and am unable to test 5.1 at this point. 4.2.1.9 to 4.2.2.12 wouldn't seem
> to be that nasty of a jump.
Hmm, I tried running the "cleanup backupgroups" command and got the
result:
ANR0106E imutil.c(8262): Unexpected error 0 fetching row in table
"Object.Ids"
Seems to be a known problem. (and I'm running 4.2.2.12)
Suad
--
APAR= IC34375 SER=
this on our old Sun server round a year ago with a slightly smaller
DB running TSM3.7.3.
The unload ran for a similar time but the load ran for almost double the time. I
think it may have been the result of a slower disk/CPU.
Cheers, Suad
--
/workstations but get 25-35 GB/hr for db servers. I've actually got
some I/O problems myself that are begin fixed by plugging in some extra bandwidth,
so I can tell you the difference after that.
Suad
--
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 12:23:56AM +0300, Bill Smoldt wrote:
> I've gone back thr
HP now are in the process of buying Compaq so never isn't the operative word
;)
Suad
--
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 07:02:50PM -0400, Adolph Kahan wrote:
> I don't believe that the HP support for IBM LTO is available yet. I
> could be wrong. Are the drives in the 3584 native fibre
"numberlicenses=the_number" (I think it was) where you indicate how many
> of those licenses you purchased.
It's a bug. APAR IC30965.
The license files have not changed in 4.2. according to the packages.
Suad
--
APAR= IC30965 SER=IN INCORROUT
UNABLE TO
out an tape for off-site just mark the access to "offsite".
> 4) can i check in and check out tapes using library operation pannel.
You can, but TSM won't know about it :)
If you require Ops. to do it, use scripts and complete instructions "or" train
them up as, if it can
d a node backup failure as
there was no more scratch tapes and the other filling volumes were occupied (had
to run a listener script to detect this when it happens).
It's happened to IBM and HP branded tapes.
Anyone have the same things happen with Ultriums?
Suad
--
act[s] of the
nodes with summary of details and e-mails the admins of the policy
domains a list of the most significant sessions.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 12:59:33PM -0400, Marc Levitan wrote:
> I am looking for a script that will list the clients that backed up and how
> much
That will imply 3rd party SCSI copy functionality, which I haven't
seen any indication they have incorporated to TSM.
The physical data will still have to go through the TSM server, within the
SAN environment, before it gets put in a storage pool.
Suad
--
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 10:44
***
Due to a change in the LUM tools used by TSM for licensing, the
current implementation of licensing is unable to recognize the
fact that multiple copies of a license key are in the nodelock
file.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 03:52:38PM -0500, Charles Ander
ess someone can say
otherwise?
Suad
--
ESS via FC, I've set up a LANE ATM connection to the above sector switch
reducing routing overheads for the back-end/private traffic.
Does it sound Kosher??
Thanks, Suad
--
Suad Musovich ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Unix Support, ITSS Operations
University of Auckland
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 11:59:54AM +0100, Henk ten Have wrote:
> On 30-Oct-01 Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,GL-IS/CIS wrote:
> > Andy,
> > do you mean 4.1.2.16 and not 4.1.2.6 ?
>
> Nope. 4.1.2.6 is now available:
You are both dyslexic.... 4.2.1.6
:)
Suad
--
> service.boulde
an't get this other server I might farm some clients during the day
to take the load off.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 11:24:24AM -0600, George Lesho wrote:
> Suad, Have you considered a strategy where you give the desktops access to
> network drives on a "few" servers that would be backed up incrementally?
> Trying to back up hundreds of desktops in a small win
rning and no nodes are queueing for tapes and the diskpool util
is greater than 75%.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 12:46:53PM -0500, Selva, Perpetua wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does anyone know what might be the cause of this problem?
> >
> > I h
Yep, in dsm.opt file
DOMAIN systemobject
It will backup the system files as well though.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:12:58PM -0300, Christian Astuni wrote:
> Hello everyone !!!
> I want to know if exist the way with TSM 4.2 to perform a backup only of
> REGISTY.
, there was
95% read and 100% write to cache. The load hasn't significantly increased.
Any filesystem experts willing to share their opinion?
Cheers, Suad
--
How about jfs ?
It is now on Linux ;)
Cheers, Suad
--
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 06:19:26PM +0100, Remco Post wrote:
> Coolness,
>
> thanks for the hint. It is even in the readme, no hint about ext3 there so we
> must assume ext3 is not yet supported. Luckily ext3 is sort of ext2 r
owdown when the system can't
feed a constant stream of data to the tapes.
Cheers, Suad
--
Look at the cooling requirements of HP drives, apparently they caused problems
in some environments that did not have a decent air reticulation environment.
Suad
--
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 08:56:52AM -0600, Wu, Jie wrote:
> we are trying to decide what LTO drives we should purchase: HP&#
Jorge,
Please turn off html editing of your e-mail messages, some of us don't
have browser capable mail readers.
Suad
--
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 02:01:37PM -0400, Jorge Rodriguez wrote:
And make sure you don't have locked ports down in the OS.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 04:09:34PM -0600, Davidson, Becky wrote:
> Make sure that under the dsm.sys they exist and then use
> dsmadmc -se= to connect
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chan, Kien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tues
t inopportune
moment. I'd say it's a bona-fide bug though.
Suad
--
(TSM4.2.0.1/AIX4.3.3)
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 05:18:08PM +0100, Jesper Matthiesen wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I think i could use a few good ideas !
>
> I have a few sessions hanging on my system looking like this :
>
;q mount" showed there was 5 idle mounts. I had to manually dismount a tape to
get it to recognise the free drive. The process has then requested and mounted a
subsequent tape.
Has anyone seen this one ?
Cheers, Suad
--
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 02:24:24PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If
Mountretention only looks at idle tapes.
A process/session requesting a tape should normally take over a tape resource
if it's idle, regardless.
This is a possible issue of the 8 legged variety.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 11:22:11AM -0500, William Boyer wrote:
> C
I did some searching and a I found a bug, that was supposed to be fixed
in the last patch, very similar to the one I've described. (IC31961)
I'm running ATape 6.3.2.0 which has conspicuously disappeared from the ftp site.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 08:48:22AM -0600,
found.
Anyone have similar probs?
Cheers, Suad
--
sometimes
(sessions without nodenames)
I'm in the middle of upgrading anything that looks like its patchable
to bring the system current.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 05:16:15PM +0100, Dmitri Pasyutin wrote:
> Hi Suad,
>
> You probably need to increase the MAXSESSIONS option
olors and location of the human readable
characters are at users specification."
We were looking at having a small (~6pt) font string along the top of the label,
as you would see on some commercial barcode tags, but our printer we use and quality
of our label stock discounted that.
Cheers, S
(i.e. cold). The only
reason you may want to use the TDP is if you mount the pseudo volume on
another machine to reduce I/O impact
on the main host, otherwise it benefits for cold backups.
Cheers, Suad
--
- Original Message -
From: "Jin Bae Chi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <
I will be out of the office starting 08/04/2005 and will not return until
11/04/2005.
I am away from the office until Monday 11th April
For storage related problems/questions/requests, contact Rik Foote
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I will be out of the office starting 15/04/2005 and will not return until
18/04/2005.
I am away from the office until Monday 18th April
For storage related problems/questions/requests, contact Rik Foote
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I will be out of the office starting 22/04/2005 and will not return until
26/04/2005.
I am away from the office until Tuesday 26th April.
I will be out of the office starting 04/05/2005 and will not return until
05/05/2005.
I am away from the office until Thursday 5th May
Files: 0, Unreadable Bytes: 0. Current Physical
File (bytes): 512,000
Waiting for access to output volume UA0283
(19095 seconds).
Suad
--
File (bytes): 512,000
>
> Waiting for access to output volume UA0283
> (19095 seconds).
>
>
> Suad
> --
It's probably adjusting to the narrow frame width of the browser.
Redirect to a file (" > filename") and look at the output. Not sure if
you can do this with a browser
You can also run a commandline script and use the -commadelimited flag.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Tue, 2002-10-
Depends if you are running other processes (especially expiration).
Also you havent mentioned your HW configuration.
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 04:54, Dearman, Richard wrote:
> I haven't done aTSM DB backup in the last few days. So I started one today
> and it is moving very slow I have a 30GB databa
hey should get it considering the
scale of this problem. (e.g. try find matching firmware/BIOS/driver for
a FASTt HBA adapter, not challenging enough...match it with a supported
SDD/RDAC)
Actually, this seems to reflect how it works when you deal with IBM via
their public call centre.
Suad
--
http://ww
Realistically, if Array B dies, you lose the Database "and" recovery
log. The mirroring ain 't giving you protection from that.
I would separate the recovery log to array A and lose the mirroring on
both DB and log(maybe mirror log between arrays).
Restoration of a broken DB should only mean a coup
How about other older versions/platforms?
Has anyone tested older 3.1/7 clients with the 5.1 server?
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 08:22, Dirk Billerbeck wrote:
> Sorry, OS/2 (BTW: IBMs OWN operating system!!) is no longer supported! :
> -(( The latest client version is v3.7.2.27, you can find it here:
This is being addressed in the 2.5/3.0 kernel
but means, in the short/medium term, Linux could be an issue.
We are playing safe, initially, and using the TSM Linux server for lots
of small nodes and virtual volumes to our main TSM server.
Suad
--
> 1. Running TSM Server under Linux on Int
meserver (AUTH02.NS.UU.NET)
Unintentional, or brutal??
Suad
--
> Are you trying to go to a page within www.tivoli.com, or did you actually
> try the main www.tivoli.com page? Try the main page to see if you can get
> to it. If that doesn't work, then try flushing your web browser cache,
find that it quite
easily handles saturation for long periods of time.
Theorectically you can backup 55Gbytes an hour, depending how well your
server/network/settings are tuned.
Suad
--
On Sat, 2002-11-23 at 05:30, Camilo A. Marrugo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need some advice if possible, we a
Why not put in some 3592 drives in the 3494?
Unfortunately the number of files is going to be the limiting factor.
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 19/06/2005
06:08:42 AM:
> From the movie "Blazing Saddles" ... You use your tongue better than
> a $20 ...you-know-what. Couldn't have said it bet
I will be out of the office starting 05/08/2005 and will not return until
08/08/2005.
I am away from the office until Monday 8th August. Pls contact Rik Foote
for any urgent enquiries.
I will be out of the office starting 07/10/2005 and will not return until
18/10/2005.
I am away from the office until Tuesday 18th October. Pls contact Rik Foote
for any urgent enquiries.
I will be out of the office starting 31/10/2005 and will not return until
04/11/2005.
I am away from the office until Thursday 4th November. Pls contact Rik
Foote for any urgent enquiries.
I will be out of the office starting 03/12/2005 and will not return until
13/12/2005.
I am away from the office until Monday 13th November. Pls contact Bruce
Campbell for any urgent enquiries.
I will be out of the office starting 09/03/2006 and will not return until
13/03/2006.
I am away from the office until Monday 13th March. Pls contact Rik Foote
for any urgent enquiries.
I will be out of the office starting 08/05/2006 and will not return until
09/05/2006.
I am away from the office until Tuesday 9th May. Pls contact Rik Foote for
any urgent enquiries.
have
to come up with you own conclusions.
Cheers, Suad
--
Paul van Dongen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
24/11/2006 11:02 PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Mixed 3592Gen1 & Gen2
Hel
Messages fileset are corrupt.
Get the messages filesets from another source (ask your Tivoli rep)
Cheers, Suad
--
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 19/12/2006
10:53:07 AM:
> Hi all,
>
> We are right now upgrading from TSM 5.2.3 to 5.3 .. however we encouter
> this prob
Recommended to use the Automatic Cleaning method.
It's in the Planning and Operator guides of both the 3583 and 3584.
Cheers, Suad
--
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 22/12/2006
02:14:32 PM:
> Those of you who have the IBM 3584 tape libraries - please weigh in on
&g
a.k.a I dont want to reinvent the wheel.
Can anyone suggest an elegant way of feeding SQLBT summary data through to
TSM so we
can see it on the activity log?
Cheers, Suad
--
found older and I/O bound servers getting up to half the throughput
of something
new, out of the box.
Sounds like you have more than enough grunt to push data through to the
drives.
Cheers, Suad
--
- Original Message -
From: "MC Matt Cooper (2838)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: &
I had a similar problem, I ended up physically pulling it out,
re-inventorizing and checking it back in.
The bugs in the 3494 are there but more subtle :)
- Original Message -
From: "Prather, Wanda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 6:50 AM
Subject
Are there more nodes/filespaces defined using that stgpool?
Maybe you want to switch off collocation for that stgpool.
Cant really say beyond that as you have supplied little extra info.
Cheers, Suad
--
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/11/2004
02:02
Yes, the storage pool can have collocation turned off without affecting
existing data.
Just a note, you may want to read up on what collocation does. Over time
it will affect overall restore
performance as node data will be spread amongst many tapes.
Cheers, Suad
--
"ADSM: Dist Stor Ma
Sounds like a network issue..
/usr/include/sys/errno.h:
#define EPIPE 32 /* Broken pipe */
bit of a bummer.
cheers, Suad
--
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/11/2004
09:27:01 AM:
> Sunday AM, after running 15 hou
CHAR64
OCCUPANCY STGPOOL_NAME VARCHAR30
OCCUPANCY NUM_FILES INTEGER 0
OCCUPANCY PHYSICAL_MBDECIMAL14
OCCUPANCY LOGICAL_MB DECIMAL14
OCCUPANCY FILESPACE_ID INTEGER
s non trivial.
If you have multiple TSM servers sharing a library, I would personally
define a dedicated TSM LM instance
(maybe on a separate port) that you can easily move with minimal planning,
in future.
Cheers, Suad
--
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 21/03/2007
05:36:37 AM:
>
How about "virtualmountpoint", for a few folders, in the client options
file and have the tape stgpool collocate by filespace.
Cheers, Suad
--
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 21/03/2007
09:03:06 PM:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I am trying to backup a very large FS
/adsm-l@vm.marist.edu/
Cheers, Suad
--
"Pahari, Dinesh P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
30/03/2007 01:48 PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
TSM Backup - Volume Shadow Copy Failed
I will be out of the office starting 24/08/2007 and will not return until
03/09/2007.
I am away from the office until Monday 3rd September. Pls contact Rik Foote
for any urgent enquiries.
the files you want. Make sure you note the settings so you can restore
the association afterwards.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Mon, Aug 07, 2000 at 04:45:00PM -0700, Joshua S. Bassi wrote:
> Yes, I would also like to download all the manuals and carry them on
> my laptop when I go out to customer
I had a lack of a command-line box under Linux but it turned out Java
got switched off.
Do you get Java errors displaying in the status bar if you put your mouse over
the box? (I noticed the Mac Netscape was playing up)
Cheers, Suad
--
On Mon, Aug 07, 2000 at 03:25:29PM -0500, Orville Lantto
age on the SAN is
> managed by the TSM server and shared between the server and client."
>
> Is it possible to do this with TSM server version 3.7? If yes, how can I
> do this?
> Thanks.
AFAIK, it got released with 4.1
Cheers, Suad
--
too much of a hassle, I wouldn't think.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 09:56:45AM -0700, Daniel Swan/TM wrote:
> My org has determined that they'd like to incorporate ADSM into our existing
> alert infrastructure. I figure it's a matter of parsing the event
101 - 175 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
