This might be an RTFM question, in which case, many apologies.
Is there anyway to reference an archive (for retrieval, deletion, etc), purely
by the
text in the description field from the command line?
It's a piece of cake to do from the GUI, but I'm trying to work out how to do a
retrieval
when
a 3494 library - any idea
where
the server software would take it's date/time from? Reason I ask is that
currently the
ADSM server is about one month and one hour ahead of the AIX server upon which
it sits.
Thanks for the input.
Robert Cross.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Has anyone run into problems running either the TSM 3.7.2 or 4.1.1 clients
on Solaris 2.6 with the latest patch level?
I've got a 105181-23 kernel running and the GUI client collapses with
a segmentation fault, the command line gives
"ANS9505E unkown: cannot initialize DM services. Reason: Operat
Sorry if this is a "doh!" question
Is it possible to restore an entire named archive in a single command, i.e.
selecting on the contents of the "Description" field. This is easy in the GUI
client, but I'd like to be able to do this without needing an X display.
What I'm looking for is somet
's long term
future, given that Veritas now own it.
Oh, the other thing would be to use Sun's Jumpstart system along with
customised boot media. We're also looking at this, (as a low priority
item),
since it's standard and free, (I've got printed Jumpstart docs that came
I've got a funny 'fault' with our system, (3.1.2.40 server with attached four
drive 3494),
as follows:
Clients set restores going, and most of the time there's no problems. But,
every so
often, we get a restore which needs data on a lot of tapes, (for example 30 or
more).
Invariably this restore
This might be a dumb question - in which case apologies.
Has anyone got any good reason why we shouldn't go directly
from ADSM 3.1.2.50 server (AIX) to TSM 4.1, missing out the TSM3.7 step?
Just wondering if there were any 'gotchas' that meant it was better to do the
upgrade as ADSM->v3.7->v4.1.
