I still think we need a requirement for the client generate an (OPTIONAL)
log on RESTORE.
Whine.
Whine.
Wanda Prather
The Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Lab
443-778-8769
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Intelligence has much less practica
Or if there are a LOT of files, I believe you can do it by EXPORTING the
client, deleting it, then reimporting it. I THINK all the management class
rules have to get reapplied on an IMPORT.
Granted this is a big pain if the client has a huge amount of data, but it's
the only way I can think of..
DELETE FILESPACE will also cause this big time. I get them frequently, and
actually found an APAR somewhere in IBMLINK that agrees they are harmless -
just retry your operation after the background process has completed.
Wan
I do not believe there is any direct support in TSM for having 2 types of
drives within the same library.
You do not tell us your server platform, so I am not sure if this will help
you, as my experience is on AIX:
We did it with an STK9710 by defining 2 different TSM LIBRARY definitions.
A "LIB
Yes. That is done with the dsmcutil utility, which is installed in the
..\tsm\baclient subdirectory.
(Formally called "TSM Windows NT Scheduler Service Configuration Utility
Command Line Interface".
Look in the client README under the topic "Central Scheduler", that is where
it is documented.
? In other words, if the web wizard is run
the
first time it only prompts the user to install. Once installed, if it is run
again it prompts to ether remove or upgrade.
Sam Lovejoy
"Prather, Wanda"
cc:
Sent by: &q
We have the opposite situation - we have fast robotics and use collocation.
With collocation on fast tape, it doesn't matter whether you are doing 2
weeks or 2 years of data, a restore takes the same amount of time.
Doing periodic fulls doesn't "refresh" anything, from TSM's point of view -
the o
ore time.
Robin Sharpe
Berlex Labs
"Prather, Wanda"
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Robin Sharpe/WA/USR/SHG)
12/17/01 11:18 Subject:
AM
ta to disk, bigger server, Gigabit
>ethernet on server, switched network, multiple threads on restore
>
>Jeff Bach
>Home Office Open Systems Engineering
>Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
>
>WAL-MART CONFIDENTIAL
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Prather, Wanda [SMTP:[EMAI
This comment on Enterprise Backup Solutions was originally posted on usenix;
I'm reposting it here with the author's permission, because it's all too
common and all too true!!
-Original Message-
From: Benjy Feen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 5:58 PM
T
You could also use some of that 100 GB disk to automate your DB backups.
Then copy the resulting file to DDS3 manually when you are ready to send
offsite.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subje
Strange.
Your query worked for me (with a different nodename), although I had to add
the date to restrict the output to the last 7 hours:
tsm: SSDADSM>select date_time, message from actlog where nodename='PRATHW1'
and
time(actlog.date_time) >= current_time - 7 hours and date(actlog.date_time)=
cu
You can multi-thread your restores as well.
It doesn't occur automatically, but if your fileserver has more than one
drive/filesystem, just open a second GUI window and start a second or third
restore, one for each filesystem/drive.
Even if the restores call for all the same tapes, assuming you
I believe the original README with the V4.1 client said that if you are
upgrading from V3 to V4, you should UNINSTALL the 3.1.x client first, then
install the V4 client from scratch.
Then if you are going from any 4.1 to any 4.2, you should be able to just
put on the latest patch level.
The clie
Probably not. Call Tivoli to be sure.
I have not tried 3.7 vs. 4.1, but at other server levels I have found it
impossible to import into a down-level server.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Dowsett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 7:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are several things you can try to fix it, depending on which works
better for you:
1) Set the high-mig value for the disk pool LOWER.Or make your disk pool
BIGGER.
Either way, to make sure that when the client wants to back up, there is
always enough room for him in the disk pool
2) Ch
That's interesting! I know the FORMAT of the lables is the same, but I
thought AIX wrote them in ASCII, and OS/390 wrote them in EBCDIC. Does AIX
write them/read them in EBCDIC?!?
-Original Message-
From: Joshua S. Bassi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 5:15 PM
One of our TSM AIX servers has several clients outside the firewall, we just
opened port 1500 for its IP address. We normally run in polling mode,
anway.
The only problem we have seen was timeouts caused by the firewall.
Apparently some firewall software is set up to close the connection if
tra
One of our TSM servers backs up approx. 350 Wintel desktops nightly, plus
about 30 Windows & UNIX servers.
Our users keep their .pst files on their desktops, rather than on the
fileserver. Our daily load has been growing steadily, doubling every year,
and I determined that the biggest chunk of t
application than you'd think" -
Scott Adams/Dilbert
With regards,
Stefan Holzwarth
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2002 19:50
> An: [EMAIL
SHARED DYNAMIC doesn't help. Like other !?%?$## Windows applications,
Outlook opens the file as LOCKED. NOTHING, including TSM or other Windows
applications, can read it, short of using Open File manager (which I've
never done).
-Original Message-
From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
We have 400 3590K's, from IBM, in use for about 8 months.
Used by DFHSM, not TSM, on the mainframe.
We do vaulting daily, so there is a lot of tape handling going on.
So far we have found only 1 bad tape.
You should be getting less than 1% failures.
Something BAD is going on...
-Original Mess
That's a known bug in 3.7.3.
I ran into that on both Windows and AIX servers.
Put on the patch for 3.7.4 (or higher), that's the only fix I know of.
-Original Message-
From: Manoel Braz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ds
Also remember that EXPORT tapes are tracked in the VOLHIST file.
If you want to prevent overwriting those, you have to keep the VOLHIST
entries around.
I purge all the STGNEW, STGREUSE, and STGDELETE entries that are old than 6
months. The only reason I keep anything THAT old, is because sometim
Do you mean you are restoring the TSM data base itself, or another type of
data base?
Our TSM server is AIX, but we run ACSLS, have two STK 9710 libraries
(type=ACS to TSM).
Some of the checkout and DRM options are "odd" for type=ACS libraries, but
certainly nothing having to do with restoring d
Starting with TSM 4.1, any client that has contacted the server in the last
30 days is "in use" and counts against your licenses. So there is no need
to export dead clients until you need to recover the space used in your
storage pool & TSM db.
-Original Message-
From: Dylan Ryback [mai
And WHY do I have to call a DIFFERENT sales person for Tivoli software than
IBM software?
And WHY do I have to have a DIFFERENT support contract for Tivoli software
than IBM software?
And WHY do I have to call a DIFFERENT support number for Tivoli problems
than IBM software?
And WHY do I have to h
Did you specify REMOVE=NO on the CHECKOUT LIBV?
-Original Message-
From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How to delete a library that has been disconnected
Think in terms of a disaster has occurred and al
It's not that bad, and not that big a deal.
If you look around, you can find individual files that will expand due to
compressing a second time (and it doesn't matter whether it's hardware or
software compression the second time).
But I've done testing with 3490 & 9840 technology, and if you are
I-O. I-O, it's all about I-O.
I'm not a Windows heavy, and I don't consider myself an AIX heavy, either
(in fact I'm not sure I know anything any more -- better not continue down
that road...)
But I've done a lot of performance work over the years, and I've done TSM on
Windows, TSM on AIX,
Kelly (and others),
This is VERY interesting, as I need to find an upgrade path for our largest
TSM server.
Can you give me some info about your I/O config for these Windows servers?
How many paths to the disk/ what type?
My current server is AIX on an F50, no problem with cycles. Four 9840
dri
Just tested this to be sure.
Inactive versions are rebound when the active version is rebound.
But in the case where there is NO active version, the inactive versions
won't be rebound at all.
(These would be inactive backup versions of files that have been deleted
from the client.)
-Origin
Wow, now that is a great answer. Thanks.
Jeff
> -Original Message-
> From: Prather, Wanda [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 3:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Rebinding
>
> Just tested this to be sure.
> Inactive versi
WOW! Thanks Andy -- That new feature slipped by me, I"m turning it on now!
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 9:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
I forgot to mention:
Starting with the 4.2 client, you can now use inclu
I cannot help with the problem, but I would like to know how you turned on
the logging!
-Original Message-
From: Holger Bitterlich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 4:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Win NT 4 Installer Problems with several TSM Clients
Hell
I agree. The developers do their best and then some. All the ones I have
talked with are really committed to making this the best product they can.
They take a lot of pride and interest in the product, which you can tell
because they are not REQUIRED to participate in this list; they do it
becaus
Adding a bit of my own experience to Kelley's:
Even though we are all using TSM, we use the hardware differently.
At one time we had two DLT libraries, with libraries and drives provided by
the same vendor.
Identical hardware, manufacturer, media, and microcode, same level of TSM
running each.
O
I've always been told that the password is NOT sent in plain text, it's
encrypted.
(but I've never had a sniffer to check it myself).
-Original Message-
From: Eliza Lau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 10:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: password encryption
You can do it this way from the server end -
Select node_name,filespace_name, hl_name,ll_name,state, date(backup_date)
from backups where node_name='' and state='ACTIVE_VERSION'
I prefer running it in comma-delimited mode:
Dsmadmc -id=x -password=yy -commadelimited "selectstateme
DO you have copy pool tapes available?
-Original Message-
From: Coats, Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 3:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tape Recovery
I have some tapes that seem to be having some problems. I am getting tape
errors pulled on them,
Look at the MAXSCRATCH value for the storage pool. You don't need another
350 tapes.
You can use MAXSCRATCH to strike a balance between having a zillion tapes or
no collocation at all.
The simplest explanation: If you set maxscratch to 100, TSM will put each
client on its own tape until it hits
Backup to the diskpool does not require a mount point. But it does require
adequate space in the disk pool.
My interpretation would be that the backup client has something to back up
that is larger than 2% of the diskpool.
The client sees that it can't do the incremental backup to the disk pool,
This question has come up many times before on this list.
Go to search.adsm.org and search the archives, some good souls have written
a lot of good information...
-Original Message-
From: Cahill, Ricky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 10:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECT
I haven't looked at Harbor for MANY years. Years ago it was a pretty good
product, I haven't kept up with its evolution. And as I recall it was more
like TSM than Legato is. But the biggest thing it has that I know is
different from TSM is the ability to compare 2 files from different clients
an
What is your TSM server platform?
-Original Message-
From: Matt Simpson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 2:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Need ideas for offsite copy of HSM tapes
We are using TSM and the HSM client to replace a system which used
Unitree
eas for offsite copy of HSM tapes
At 3:09 PM -0500 2/20/03, Prather, Wanda wrote:
>What is your TSM server platform?
TSM Server 4.2.3.0 on Solaris 8
will probably upgrade to TSM Server 5.?.?.? in the near future if
they ever release one that people here seem to think is stable.
Lease on the
Hi John,
I should have included more caveats in that message; I didn't mean to imply
that AIX performance is ALWAYS better than OS/390. You can certainly set up
configurations where either OS/390 performs better, or where AIX performs
better. And I am certainly not an AIX wizard, my background i
Look for the file dsmserv.err.
Sometimes when the server crashes it puts useful info in there.
-Original Message-
From: Jozef Zatko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 11:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM server crashing
Hello guys,
Can you help me please wi
Well, for that matter, why not just have the client send the processor info
back to the server?
It sends back the OS level. Seems to me the software should collect the
information if that's what it needs...
-Original Message-
From: Joshua S. Bassi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday
I have never run into anything like this.
I run this script regularly:
select char(stgpool_name,12) as stgpool, -
cast(sum(physical_mb)/1024 as decimal(10,1)) as Physical_GB , -
cast(sum(logical_mb)/1024 as decimal(10,1)) as logical_gb, -
sum(num_files) as objects -
from occup
Hi Jack,
You are clearly having some problems, either hardware or microcode, if you
are getting this many errors. You will probably continue to get more of
these errors until you pursue what is going on.
That said, we can try to clean up the tape mess.
Let's deal with the "destroyed" tapes firs
To bind your system objects (Win2K) to a specific management class, the
syntax is:
Include.SystemObject ALL smallserver
You can find this in the "Using the Windows Clients" manual (for either V4
or V5).
The manual also says specifically that no other type of include/exclude will
affect how SYSTEM
I would always use the TSM driver when possible, especially on Windows.
I have gotten in trouble before when using the generic driver, then
upgrading to a version of Windows that "sees" the device differently. Not
likely to happen, but I have never had any problem using the TSM drivers.
-Orig
We run AIX 4.3.3, have gone from TSM 3.1 to 3.7 to 4.1 to 4.2.1.5. Etc.
On ADSM 3.1, you needed ACSLS to support some types of devices that ADSM
didn't support native.
And at one time you could put two types of drives in the library if you used
ACSLS, and TSM doesn't support that with native
Usually this is a load issue. It SHOULD work just fine.
But EXPIRATION hits the data base and the log really hard.
It might make your migration run longer; do you care?
The most common issue people have when running two DB-intensive operations
together is running out of log space.
If those two
I have done this many times, don't worry it works!
You should NOT tar over .../server/ folder. In fact you could cause
problems; dsmserv.opt, for example, has some parms that include filenames,
which might be different on your new server, that you shouldn't stomp. Same
for dsmserv.dsk. If you
That USED to be true. The ability to access client data using the admin id
and password was added as a feature somewhere, maybe 3.7, don't remember.
-Original Message-
From: Gerhard Rentschler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 11:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
HI JERRY! Good to hear from you.
1) If you search the archives at search.adsm.org for "VTS", you will find
lots of discussions on the pros and cons of using virtual tape with TSM.
2) This is the coold part. What you do is
1) create your new device class
2) create a new sequentia
Everything you did is OK.
And with old versions of the client (V3.1, for instance) that is all you had
to do.
But on W2K, you need more steps for the service.
1) Repeat all the stuff you did, that makes the GUI OK.
2) Start the GUI, pull down Utilities, Setup Wizard
3) Click (only) the check box f
Is anyone using the IBM 3600 or 3581 Autoloader with TSM?
Would like to get some info from you.
Please respond directly: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Many thanks to all who responded to my question.
I appreciate all the help!
-Original Message-
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 4:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM and LTO Autoloader
Is anyone using the IBM 3600 or 3581 Autoloader with
Andy,
ANR0406 just shows the nodename for the client:
03/18/2003 11:51:39 ANR0406I Session 70211 started for node PRATHW1 (WinNT)
(Tcp/Ip 128.244.81.137(1160)).
When I access data from another machine (not my own) using dsm
-virtualnodename and override the clients password
nternet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (change eye to i to reply)
The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
"Prather, Wanda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager&
Well, instead of having them run the archive twice, you can just create
multiple copy pools.
Send one offsite, keep the other onsite.
But here is another solution: If your data base logs are going to a disk
pool,
run your backup stgpool from your DISKPOOL to create the copy pool tape.
Backup stgp
Doesn't the new licensing scheme result in 1) higher prices for clients, but
2) lower prices for the server.
So that if you are just buying client licenses you get hurt.
But if you are setting up a new TSM server you don't have that big up front
charge for the server end.
So if you plan to bac
Don,
DSMCAD isn't the only exposure
With DSMCAD on, a help desk person can be working on node DESKTOP1 and cause
files TO BE RESTORED to node PAYROLSERVER.
But even with DSMCAD turned off, I can be on my node DESKTOP1 and do:
dsm -virtualnodename=PAYROLSERVER
I override the password popup with
I don't think the Redbook on TSM & Win2K deals with user profiles, as they
assume you are backing up servers and most people don't care about the
desktop profile for server administrators. We back up about 400 Win2K pro
machines, so the profile matters to us.
1) When you reinstall the new windows
Could be anything - a switch somewhere between you and the H50, or even the
PCI bus in the Compaq.
First thing I would suggest is trying an FTP.
You can do that from a DOS window.
Take a fairly large file (at least 100MB, preferably larger) and FTP it to a
temp directory on your H50.
Do it 4-5 tim
I don't think that is recorded anywhere. No way to get it from a SELECT
that I know of.
-Original Message-
From: Wholey, Joseph (IDS DM&DS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 8:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Select for tapes mounted for a retrieve operation
As far as I can tell, the "new" IBM TSM web site is completely non
functional.
I can't click the DOWNLOADS or APARS link without getting an error.
I can't get far enough to log in.
Is anybody else having this problem?
And does anybody know who we should call to report the web site down?
Same here. 2 this morning, nothing since.
-Original Message-
From: Taha, Hana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 3:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Emails from Owner
I got only two this morning.
Hana Taha
Parker Drilling
Office 281.406.2486
Fax281.406.
On Windows it is not saved in a file.
It is in the registry.
Use regedit.exe and search for the string ADSM under SOFTWARE.
-Original Message-
From: Ameerul Mazli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 8:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Password file for TDP Oracle on W
You will need to update the volume first to: update vol xxx
access=onsite
BUT, you don't actually have to bring the volume back. If there is no data,
the audit will clean up the mess without actually calling for a mount.
-Original Message-
From: Ford, Phillip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
We use subfile backup even on local desktops, works great.
Cut our daily load by about 30%.
-Original Message-
From: John Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 8:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Remote clients transferring GBs over WAN
>From 4.1 onwar
For onsite tapes, TSM reclaims the ones with the most free space first, just
working down the eligible list one tape at a time.
For offiste tapes, it appears that TSM looks at all the data on all the
eligible tapes, then tries to mount each input tape required (from your
onsite pool) just once. W
ervers as well?
Regards, Joe
-Original Message-----
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 5:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Remote clients transferring GBs over WAN
We use subfile backup even on local desktops, works great.
Cut our dail
Brad,
TSm will not restore a SYSTEM OBJECT to a different machine.
Now it can be a physically different machine, but it must have the same
hostname, and it must have identical hardware, as you are restoring the
registry, which includes hardware information.
-Original Message-
From: Br
Regardless of the client level, you can open as many dsm windows and start
as many restores at once as you want.
That's the best way to go if you have multiple filesystems to restore, up
until you bottleneck your networks.
-Original Message-
From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
As stated previously, TSM will not give you the original file size OR the
real size after compression on the back end. So all you can look at is file
counts.
Another possible approach to the file counts is sampling
When I had to do this, I actually pulled ALL the entries from the backup
table fo
You are invited to join us for the next meeting of TSMUG, the
Baltimore/WashingtonDC/Northern Virginia TSM user's group --
Date:April 30, 2003
Time:8:30 am - 1 pm
Location:Computer Applications Specialists (CAS)
6201 Chevy Chase Drive
Laurel MD 20707
Depends on your situation...
one solution:
We created an admin account (ex. QUERY), that is granted no authority.
Which means it can do queries, but can't change anything.
For scripts that just do queries, we use that admin id and don't sweat
whether it's hackable.
Now in theory somebody could fi
Hi Tab,
Haven't done WinXP with subfile, but we do a lot of WIn2K Pro with subfile.
When does it engage?
There is (or was) a white paper on the Tivoli site that has the rules in it.
I have copy somewhere, let me know if you need it.
In general, it engages always EXCEPT :
- for very tiny
You can select from the BACKUPS table.
One of the columns is "filespace_name", so you can restrict your queries to
just the files you are interested in.
E.G.,
select hl_name, ll_name, state, date(backup_date) from backups where
node_name='XXX' and filespace_name <> 'SYSTEM OBJECT'
The BACKUPS
Agreed. Been there, done that before-
Since your tapes are in PENDING status, they haven't been written over
(which is what PENDING is for.)
So if you roll your DB back, they will be readable.
'Course, you gotta either take your system down, or have a "test" TSM server
to do it with.
Grab yourse
We have MANY win2k systems at SP2 and some at SP3 that back up system files
fine with 4.2.0.0 client.
But, some mysteriously develop the illness you describe! We have had 5 win2K
systems at SP3 that will back up everything BUT system files.
I never figured out exactly what the problem is, but I f
We share between OS/390 and Windows TSM.
The systems share the services of the library manager, the robot arm, and
the inventory slots, but not the drives.
That is, your drives must be dedicated to either one or the other. Also,
your tape ranges-scratch pools must be dedicated.
The mainframe dri
We have a Win2K TSM server with a point-to-point Ethernet connection to a
3494 library with 3- 3590 fibre drives. I think that is exactly the same
setup as using 3590 SCSI drives, except of course for the type of cable.
Now that 3494 is also attached to a mainframe and has 2 ESCON controllers
and
I've never seen any reason to have different device classes for primary &
copy pools, assuming they are physically the same device type.
-Original Message-
From: Zosimo Noriega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 4:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Device Class
H
s from the STK silos .
Matthew Lynch
Teale Data Center
Storage Administration
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (916) 464-4204
"Prather, Wanda"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
UAPL
If your client is at least 4.2, and you do not have a restrictive DOMAIN
statement in dsm.opt, a scheduled incremental includes backup systemobject.
Check the scheduler log, you will see several messages like "Backup System
Object: Event log", "Backup System Object: Registry", etc. that let you
DIRECTORIES are always bound to the management class with the longest
retention period, not necessarily the default management class. That
probably explains what is happening.
Look at using the DIRMC parameter in the dsm.opt file.
It lets you specify which management class you want the directorie
ribed. The
directories are being bound to this management class. I would look into
DIRMC parameter, but is there any way to expire the directories from the
present management class.
Thanks,
Raminder Braich.
"Prather, Wanda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
07/01/2003 11:10 AM
Please respond t
Cool!
Thanks Andy!
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 11:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: New Admin CLI option to display only the output data
A new 5.2 feature:
Launch the admin command line interface with the new -DATAOnly
Will also depend on the complexity of your client environment.
One TSM adminstrator scales up very well; you don't get a lot of extra work
on the server end when you go from 100 clients to 200.
But, who is managing the extra 100 clients?
Dan's note doesn't mention the work required on that end.
Need some help from you AIX wizards out there.
I have a new TSM environment; there are 4 p-series servers, all at AIX 5.1
in 32bit mode.
One is a dedicated TSM server, with the unimaginative hostname of "TSM".
(OK, so we're not creative - that's why we have the techie jobs...)
The other 3 server
if it is responding.
bob
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 01:02:23PM -0400, Prather, Wanda wrote:
> Need some help from you AIX wizards out there.
>
> I have a new TSM environment; there are 4 p-series servers, all at AIX 5.1
> in 32bit mode.
>
> One is a dedicated TSM server, with the
IT DEPENDS - is this a UNIX or Windows client machine?
-Original Message-
From: Farren Minns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Changing a node name
Hi All TSMers
Running TSM Server 4.2.2.12 on Solaris 2.7
We have a machine tha
Client.
Farren
|+-+------|
|| "Prather, Wanda" | |
|| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>| |
|| Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|| Manager&
And another thing:
Changing the node name may require you to reset the TSM password on the
client.
You should find out when you test the selective backup
-Original Message-
From: Prather, Wanda
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:36 AM
To: 'ADSM: Dist Stor Manager'
Subject: RE
FWIW,
I have a TSM server on AIX that is still at 4.2.1.15.
SELECT * FROM OPTIONS works fine.
But we don't have any library sharing enabled...
-Original Message-
From: Neil Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Error quer
601 - 700 of 2219 matches
Mail list logo
