I've got a client who is running TDP for Domino (version 1.1.1, I
believe) on both Windows NT and Windows 2000 servers. His NT boxes back
up his .NSF files just fine, but his 2000 boxes only get a handful of
backups nightly, when he should be getting several hundred .NSF files
backing up each nigh
"Volovsek, Jay" wrote:
>
> Jeff. I would like to sincerely thank you for that input. You were right
> on the money. When IBM configured the library, they configured it as four
> Logical Libraries. I just blew away that configuration and set it up as one
> LL. Now my servers only see one libra
John Bremer wrote:
>
> Indeed it is too bad TSM (or Veritas or Legato) doesn't supply a
> notification mechanism. It's pretty simple for our UNIX clients to notify
> themselves, but for others, not so easy.
Indeed it is too bad that people don't understand the limitations of
operating systems an
Shekhar Dhotre wrote:
>I have experienced this before , upgrade deletes all drive info , and if you
>try to reconfigure it , using smit tivoli ..you can`t you have to
>1) delete drives from ODM use odmdelete .. (#rmdev -dl rmtx --does not work)
Not true. I've upgraded from 2.x to 3.x, 3.1.x
Roy Lake wrote:
>
> Hi Chaps,
>
> Its coming to that time of the year where we have to think about upgrading our TSM
>server from 3.7.x to 4.1.x.
>
> Can you please confirm what this process involves?.
>
> I understand that we have to re-define the licences, but do we also have to
>re-define the
Andy Raibeck wrote:
> Yes, you do want to run this one. :-)
>
> You need to use the -d option when running IP21933_19_FULL.EXE, i.e.:
>
>IP21933_19_FULL -d
>
> This is described in the README.FTP file (it's in the same directory as the
> IP21933_19_FULL.EXE file).
Isn't it wonderful when pe
Leos Stehlik wrote:
>From: "Vmt H|bner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Standard Backup Clients on NT are working good, but TDP for MS Exchange
>>server is very very slow (Full backup 6G/12h).
>
>I saw similar behavior. This could be because the TDP for Exchange by
>default uses software compression
>on the
Luci Ziebart wrote:
>I have numerous questions on this subject:
>Today our ADSM Server 3.1.2.50 resides on OS390 2.5 and output media is on
>3490e cartridges. We are planing to upgrade to TSM 4.1 and the server will
>reside on UNIX Sun Solaris, the output media will be STK's 9840's PowderHorn
Reiner Sauer wrote:
> we had an as400 mod. 170 and tsm V3 client . Tsm server is AIX 4.11. We have 600
>Kb/s transfer rate to the server instead of 3000 - 4000 Kb/s as the other systems
>have (novell, solaris or aix). The backup tool is BRMS with tsm client option.
>
> Did everybody knows such p
Gerald Wichmann wrote:
> That's not true. TDS 2.1 Includes an install options for "Tivoli 3.11 ODBC
> drivers". It includes drivers for Oracle, Informix, Sybase, and MSSQL. No
> DB2. So my question still stands. I have DB2 installed on an AIX box. I do
> not have an NT ODBC driver for the TDS box.
"Kelly J. Lipp" wrote:
>
> This is a reprise of a thread started in December.
>
> Flame on:
>
> HAS ANYONE MADE THIS WORK WITH TSM 4.1???
>
> Flame off.
>
> The documentation is not clear: Does ADSMSCSI support this baby or do we
> need to use the device drivers shipped with the library? The
David Longo wrote:
>We have had several machines lately that suddenly can't talk to *SM server >and vice
>versa. Have to reboot NT to get back. ping and other comm works >o.k. These will
>work o.k a few days then same thing. These clients have >been in production for a
>good while with no
> From: Nicholas Cassimatis
> Was anything else using the tape drives? If you have 2 drives, and are
> running space reclaimation, your restore won't start until the reclamiation
> ends. Same thing with migrations tying up the tape drives. This is why I
> always recomend an odd number of tape d
Ray wrote:
> I'm relatively new to TSM, and inherited a 3.7 server on AIX with one
> 3570 library (19 tapes). We do oracle backups and Solaris/Linux/Aix/NT
> backups to the same storage pool.
>
> The problem is we're backing up up a lot of data. Occasionally TSM will
> use up all the tapes, leav
Arnaud Brion wrote:
> I'm facing an embarasting situation since I changed the way our daily job runs : I
>start a reclamation job, by decreasing the rec parameter to 50 % on all storage pools
>every morning at 3:00.
> Two hours later I start a backup stgpool job, on all storage pools too, and w
I don't know what others' experiences have been, but I have run across
something interesting.
It appears that Netware does not tolerate more than 3 concurrent DSM
threads. I can reproduce Netware abends when there are 4 or more DSM
processes. As near as I can tell, the Netware modules that chokes
Rajesh Oak wrote:
>I am running TSM 4.1.0 on Win2000. For some reason, the client schedules won't start.
>They were working at one time and suddenly it stopped. The Server won't kickoff any
>schedules.
>Please advise what to look for to make it work.
Check to see if your TSM scheduler is runnin
bbullock wrote:
> The problem that keeps me awake at night now is that we now have
> manufacturing machines wanting to use TSM for their backups. In the past
> they have used small DLT libraries locally attached to the host, but that's
> labor intensive and they want to take advantage of o
Doug Thorneycroft wrote:
> Is there a way to recover the partitioning information on Windows?
Sorry for the late reply.
No, within itself TSM has no way of preserving such information.
You may want to look at a third-party package like Bare Metal Restore
(www.tkg.com). It will work with TSM to
"Warren, Matthew James" wrote:
>Has anybody looked at using Tivoli Decision Support with TSM?
>
>>From: Jager Frederic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>I am currently evaluating a TSM KM by OTL software with
>>Patrol client and
>>console (you can get an evaluation copy). And I do think this is worth
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
