On the original question, I have moved DBs on AIX with LVM several times
with good success. The only real concern is the performance impact. The
benefit over mirroring is you can do it with no outage at all.
I have 3 servers with similar sized DBs on AIX with NetApp SAS disk on
the back end, back
have both and could not take the thru put of 3592 on really big items.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Kevin
Kettner
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 8:34 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving the TSM DB2 database (AI
My gut reaction is that your disk drives can't feed the data fast enough. If
it were me, I would open up a PMR to find out what the real bottleneck is.
David Ehresman
University of Louisville.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behal
is.
David Ehresman
University of Louisville.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Kevin
Kettner
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 11:34 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Moving the TSM DB2 database (AIX)
On the origin
x27; wafl scan measure_layout' to get a measure of the disorder.
Bill Colwell
Draper Lab
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Kevin
Kettner
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 1:24 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving the TS
I'm running 6.3.4 server on AIX. The server is getting to the end of
it's life so we're planning to replace the hardware. I have just about
everything related to TSM installed on SAN disk, besides the stuff that
gets installed in /usr. The last time I did a hardware swap was with TSM
5.5. The basi
It should be one of two solutions, make a copy to a copypool or (highly
discouraged) set the deduprequiresbackup option to no.
In my book, the risk of mass data loss is too high in a dedupe storage
pool without a copy. In a non-dedupe pool, if you lost a volume and
didn't have a copy, you might l
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Kevin
Kettner
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 2:02 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Moving TSM instance to new hardware
I'm running 6.3.4 server on AIX. The server is getting to the end of it's life
so we&#
I'm attempting to install TSM 7.1 on an AIX box for the first time. Did
anyone else notice that the install.sh script is missing a "!" in the
first line? It has "#/bin/sh" and it should have "#!/bin/sh". It's an
easy fix, but makes me wonder about the quality of the rest of the code.
After workin
-aix.html
We had some of those at newer versions than what was specified. We ended
up removing them and then installing the correct versions. Once that was
done the installer worked as it should.
On 4/18/2014 13:18, Kevin Kettner wrote:
I'm attempting to install TSM 7.1 on an AIX box fo
We are also looking to upgrade from a 3494 to a 3584. So far as I can
tell the 3584 seems to be practically a drop-in replacement for the 3494.
On 5/2/2014 14:39, Lee, Gary wrote:
Looking at updating our tape libraries for other rojects which might use ltfs.
We currently have the ibm 3494 libra
I'm a little late on this, but it looks like your main concern is avoiding all
the directory structure being backed up as well. You've already excluded the
other files and you're only backing up what you want. Your second exclude line
is redundant I think, but it would not prevent it from workin
I've been using container pools for a while on one of our prod servers (built
with container pools) and in test, but in the last few months since upgrading
to 8.1.5 on all of my servers I created a new container pools on all of the
servers and switched everything over to backup to the new pools.
Does anyone know if this eFix is included in 8.1.12.000 that just came out?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager On Behalf Of Uwe Schreiber
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2021 2:12 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] spectrum protect 8.1.11.100 strange behaviour with de
It's not on the fixes list for 8.1.12.000 so I guess that's probably a no.
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6447173
-Original Message-----
From: Kevin Kettner
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 4:02 PM
To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Subject: RE: [ADSM-L] spectrum protect 8.1.11.1
nned to include that APAR in 8.1.12.100 ... so you have to request an
eFix.
Regards, Uwe
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager On Behalf Of Kevin Kettner
Sent: Dienstag, 27. April 2021 23:17
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] spectrum protect 8.1.11.100 strange b
dsmserv.
Regards, Uwe
> Am 30.04.2021 um 16:15 schrieb Kevin Kettner :
>
> That's frustrating, conflicting information... I assume your source is from
> IBM? I opened a case with IBM on this to get the e-fix and they said that it
> is included in 8.1.12. I questioned that becaus
ginal Message-
From: Kevin Kettner
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2021 4:42 PM
To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Subject: RE: [ADSM-L] spectrum protect 8.1.11.100 strange behaviour with dedup
pool
Thanks for the info!
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager On Behalf Of Uwe Schreiber
We are doing a 5.5 to 6.2 migration now by exporting all our nodes to
new servers. Some of our oracle nodes are very large, but exporting
works fine, it just takes a while. We had one node that took over a week
to complete. Here's an outline of our process:
TSM-A is the 5.5 server. TSM-B is the 6
I'm running 6.2.4 in production on AIX. Upgrading from 6.2.2 solved some
issues for me. Haven't noticed any problems in the few weeks I've been
running it.
On 5/25/2012 12:34, Lee, Gary wrote:
Anyone out there with 6.2.3, 6.2.4 or 6.3.x in production?
I need to upgrade from 6.2.2, under RHEL
It was very painless. Here's what I did for the 6.2.4 upgrade on AIX:
1. sudo mount nfsserver:/tsm/server /mnt
2. Log in from a machine with an X windows server
3. sudo xterm & (recommended)
4. Run the installer
1. /mnt/patch/6.2.4.000/install.bin
5. Click though the menus
6. Install these co
Lately the Passport Site has been terrible. I've had a lot of problems
with it in the last few months. Account issues, website issues, download
issues, etc. Every time I need something from the site it's a huge chore.
A couple weeks ago I called in to report the "Error 400" issue and they
recomme
Does anyone know if IBM is ever going to expand the character set
accepted for TSM passwords? I was hoping that would happen in TSM 6.3,
but apparently it still has the same password rules as it has for as
long as I can remember:
http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/tsminfo/v6r3/topic/com.ibm.itsm.c
I'm in agreement. I don't think complex passwords add that much more
security, but I constantly get flack from people who don't really
understand that.
On 7/24/2012 8:37, Allen S. Rout wrote:
On 07/23/2012 06:03 PM, Kevin Kettner wrote:
http://xkcd.com/936/
I think this r
ested this enhancement already?
Nick
On Jul 23, 2012, at 5:03 PM, Kevin Kettner wrote:
Does anyone know if IBM is ever going to expand the character set
accepted for TSM passwords? I was hoping that would happen in TSM 6.3,
but apparently it still has the same password rules as it has for as
character password with only numbers would be hard to
crack since a hacker could only test 5 of 1000 possible combinations
before they were locked out.
On 7/24/2012 9:25, Thomas Denier wrote:
-Kevin Kettner wrote: -
Does anyone know if IBM is ever going to expand the character set
accepted
I was trying to figure some of this stuff out a while ago. I think I
stole some of this from somewhere (maybe even this list) and added it to
my own stash of documentation. One very important thing to know when
dealing with deduplication: The first node to backup a block owns it
(for dedupe purpos
27 matches
Mail list logo
