Has anyone yet upgraded to version 5.1 on AIX 4.3.3? If so please let us know your
experiences. We are considering going to 5.1 to utilize NDMP for a EMC Celerra.
Regards,
Charles
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Hart, Charles
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM 5.1
Has anyone yet upgraded to version 5.1 on AIX 4.3.3? If so please let
us know your experiences. We are considering going to 5.1 to utilize
NDMP
imken CompanyGlobal Software Support
P.O. Box 6927 Data Management
1835 Dueber Ave. S.W. Phone: (330)-471-3390
Canton, Ohio USA 44706-0927 Fax : (330)-471-4034
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.timken.com
-Original Message-
From: Hart, Charles [m
I had made a change in our copy groups from VerExists and VerDeleted from NoLimit to
Verexists 5 Verdeleted 3. It appears by doing this all of the TSM clients (WinNT,
Win2K, Novel, Sun ETC) are going through a "full" backup to apply the changes to each
file which is causing a huge load on the
The AIX / TSM tuning parameters on pg 342 gives a table that states anything above
512BM system memory the bufferpool should be 131072. (Assuming 4k pages x 131072 =
524288K?) Will TSM use more physical RAM if you increase the bufferpoolsize larger
than the recommended 131072?
Thank you in ad
Is anyone running TDS for TSM that has a 50GB TSM DB?
Regards,
Charles Hart
Medtronic Storage Team
One of our AIX TSM Servers has 168 clients plus archive request from large Oracle DB's
every 15min. We are running on GB Ethernet backbone and 100MB on the client side.
-Original Message-
From: Gerald Wichmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 5:06 PM
To: [EMAIL
We have two AIX servers w/ TSM 4.1 sharing a 3494Lib. We were able to
successfully Export the node from the Source to the Target Server. Once
we tried the import the node the Virtual volume that was created from
the Export process never seemed to mount so we then canceled the
process. We can see
UNSUBSCRIBE
I have had a discussion with a Tivoli - IBM CE/Sales Rep and he stated that IBM
appears to be getting the message that many of us want more stability that features,
which will then dictate how many new versions per year will be released.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Bertrand [mailt
With TSM 4.1.5 and restoring Archive objects we have had good success, the only thing
is tape contention was a bit of a factor as we were just restoring archived dbf file
from the same file system. Little different than the TSM 5.1 multi-stream backup /
restore.
-Original Message-
From
Not much need to compare the Legato piece as they are putting themselves up for sale,
which is too bad because it sounds like they were good alternative.
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2003/0207legato.html
-Original Message-
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/searchsite.cgi?query=Tivoli+Storage+Manager
-Original Message-
From: David E Ehresman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 1:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Where are the manuals today?
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tiv
We currently retain 180 Days of Version Exists, Deleted, Only and Extra Versions. Our
question is if we have been backing up node A for 600days should we not still have a
complete set of the first "Full" that is available to restore even though the file has
not changed from the first backup? (I
We will be going to Sungaurd soon restoring two TSM servers (one AIX one SUN) using
one 3494-library. Wouldn't I just modify the device.config to look at the same
library name for both servers? The issue I for see is that TSM Serve A has always
know about library A but Server B is use to backi
m the TSM servers and redefine them as the new library and drives of the
3494.
Hope this helps
Regards,
Michael Swinhoe
Storage Management Group
Zurich Financial Services
E-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Hart, Charles"
---- On , Hart, Charles ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> We currently retain 180 Days of Version Exists, Deleted, Only
and Extra Versions. Our question is if
> we have been backing up node A for 600days should we not
still have a complete set of the first
> "Full" that is availab
Would you still need ACSLS for a 9310 PowderHorn with Fiber attached 9940B Tape Drives?
Regards,
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 1:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ACSLS or Native TSM manager
We run AI
Any ANR / ANS Messages? Any more details you can provide?
-Original Message-
From: David E Ehresman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 1:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM 5.1.6.2 and AIX client 5.1.1.0
I just got back from a week off and we are having problems
Maybe only restore the "Long Term Archive Data" to then be backed up to the new TSM
environment, then otherwise let the VNB images expire. The only downside is having to
have the VNB environment hang around a while. This idea was the suggested
"Conversion" from IBM and Veritas CE's
-Origi
We see 10/11Mbs transfer rate over 100mb to Gig-e. Remember even if you have Gig-e
your bottleneck will be your slowest link. (IE 100mb which max transfer rate is 10mbs)
You may also want to verify that none of your LAN links are set to auto negotiate as
that will always screw things up.
--
Our experience was that we had to use the 5.1.0 as the base, register licenses, then
upd to 5.1.5.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Sedlacek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 1:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ITSM v5.1.5 CD-ROMs?
Env:
TSM v4.2.2.12 AIX server,
We have a backup environment where we have a lot of "Skipped Files" due to users
leaving files open which TSM appears to report as a Backup Failure when actually its a
Success with Errors? I'm asking because I have to put out a monthly backup report
that must meet our current SLA's and am getti
tomating Tasks" for info on the 5.1
backup-archive client return codes. From the TSM server, the RESULT column
in the EVENTS table and the Result column in the QUERY EVENTS output will
show you the client return code.
Regards,
Andy
Friday, March 28, 2003 08:23
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
From:
The Resource Utilization parameter in your client dsm.opt will set the number of
streams that the backup will use hence the number of drives. So if you only have two
streams going directly to tape you would only uses 2 tape drives.
I think the Resource Utilization sets the multi-streaming bas
TSM 4.1.6 on Solaris 8 I added to many mgsyslan.lic licenses and now I would like to
reduce it. I looked in the Ref and Admin guide and found no REM or DEL lic, there's
reference to the Nodelock file, but not sire if I could blow it a way and re-register?
Fat fingers in the Morning
Thanks
in/ .
Stop the TSM server application.
Rename or move the nodlock file to another directory.
Restart the TSM application, then re-register all the license.
Sias
Get your own "800" number
Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more
http://www.ure
In our experience out DB performs much faster on RAW Disk volumes as opposed to JFS
filesystems. If you got to RAW for the DB and Logs make sure the Log vol RAW disk is
not larger than the 4.5 / 5.2 Log limit of TSM 4.1.x
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Tab Trepagnier [mailto:[EMAIL P
hiele
Princeton University
Hart, Charles wrote:
> Thanks, that's what I was afraid of.
>
> Regards,
>
> Charles
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sias Dealy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 7:47 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subje
> Are most people planning on upgrading to 5.1?
We are
> What are the implications of staying at 4.2 or lower?
No Official IBM /Tivoli Support
> Is there any additional cost to upgrade?
If you have up to date paid maint no. See your sales rep
> Are there any major is
I have been trying to get a select statement that will provide a list of failed /
missed backups but excluding "Code 4" as we have many backup clients that have the
Return Code 4 Bug where Skipped Files is reported as Failed (Client ver 4.1.x to
4.2.x)
There's much discussion on this list abo
Is Virus Scanning Running on OutBound Files? Also verify that the Clinet Nic is Not
Set to Auto Negotiate or the Switch port its connected to.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Canan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 2:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Node very
I understand that 4.1.x is EndOfService, but was wondering if anyone was using 5.1
clients with 4.1.6 Server? I ask because we are in the midst of upgrading 4.1.6 TSM
servers and currently have one 5.1 server with 5.1.x clients. Our platform admins
will be rolling out the client updates and I
Also check the "Copy Frequency" setting that can be found Backup Copy Group Settings
that is applicable to that client. If the frequency is set to more than one then TSM
will only backup one copy that day, if set to 10 TSM then waits 10 days to get a copy
of the file regardless if it changed in
NopePublications are now on the Install Media... Ran in to that one yesterday
-Original Message-
From: Lawrence Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 2:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 5.2 manual CD
We received our set of TSM 5.2 CD's yesterday. I notic
1) Could take a while depending on how you changed your retention for example if you
went from 180 active version of a file to 20 then TSM would have to potentially expire
60xeach changed file. In additional WIN2k is not know for very fast I/O, not to
mention if your tsm db is not layed out in
More details... ANR Message etc?
Restore needs more tapes than the DR library will hold, and as
soon as I start the restore, the restore fails.
-Original Message-
From: Coats, Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 7:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DRM - Can'
You can backup the SYSTEMOBJECT using a specific management class to only retain a few
active copies, we went from 160 to 10, has helped quite a bit. You can search on
SYSTEMOBJECT in the mailing list and there should be a conversation pertaining to
SYSTEMOBJECT Retention.
-Original Messag
Is there really a need to run it on a JFS filesystem? We run our on SSA disk with RAW
partitions and it screams...
-Original Message-
From: PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 1:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DSMFMT takes forev
We have a Sun Box that had TSM 4.1.6 and went to 5.2. We followed the "Migrate
Install Procedure" Which basically was to do a pkgrm, then run the pkgadd and it
installed the new binaries and did the DB upgrade. Took 3hrs for a 4way 4500 with a
40GB TSM DB. You will have to confirm what patch
Not Sure about the Storage Agent, but Client backward compatibility has been great for
us. We run TSM 5.1.5 on AIX with a 3.7 OS2 client. When using different client
versions be aware that is you are using HSM or Encryption there may be issues that are
spelled out in the client readme.
Regard
ting, Inc.
>
>
>===
>MDR Consulting
>The very best in Technical Training and Consulting.
>IBM Advanced Business Partner
>SAIR Linux and GNU Authorized Center for Education
>IBM Certified Advanced Techni
I've been searching IBM's Web for IC43445... And no hits, we just updated two
AIX TSM servers to 5.2.3.4... Are we screwed?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Andrew Raibeck
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 8:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PRO
ux
Red Hat Certified Engineer, RHCE
=======
Hart, Charles wrote:
>Fantastic Read Thank you very much for the info! Just one of our TSM
>server has 300+ Clients, currently using collocation and a client setting of
>Resource o
In working with our Oracle DBA's they feel TSM< should manage the RMAN Oracle
Retentions etc... Is there a "Preferred method?" If so why?
Here's one of our DBA's response when I told them my understanding is that RMAN
usually manages the Backup Retentions etc
"Note on page 85 of the RMA
Thanks again, for your input...
This is the BEST Support list out there.
Regards,
Charles
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Andreas Almroth [ MTNCameroon O&M - DMSC ]
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 3:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sub
In previous 4.x versions to restore the TSM DB you had to set library to Manual
in the Device config. Its been quite a while since I've had to restore a TSM
DB (Thank Goodness). My question is with v5.2.x do you still have to set the
library as manual or can you use your existing device.config
Nope seems to work fine try
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/client/
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Jim Kirkman
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 7:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IBM ftp si
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches/server/AIX/5.2.3.5/
Dumb question... I have searched / waded through the IBM horrific website and
am just looking for a Backup Client to OS compatibility matrix. Our AIX admins
are asking me what TSM client supports AIX 5.3? Does anyone have a good http
link for this? I'm resorting to the ftp client patch readmes
Don't laugh... We currently save 180 Act / Deleted / Version Exists etc of our
backup files (use to be 400). Anyways in our Netbackup Env we do weekly fulls
retained for 13months and an annual full with permanent retention. I would
like to get our TSM ennv closer to our Netbackup retention as
managers
to agree to backing up less. Until you put a dollar amount to it. Every
manager loves to be associated with saving money.
Good luck,
Duane
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Hart, Charles
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004
We have found a strange situation with Tapes in our library I'm hoping that
some one could clarify what we are seeing...
Libvol Info : States its Provate but no data - Its in the Library
tsm: MSPSTG5>q libvol 3494lib1 i01448
Library Name Vo
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Stapleton, Mark
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 9:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Question About Tapes In Lib as Private - But No History /
Data On them
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Hart, Charles
>We have found a stra
ion About Tapes In Lib as Private - But No History /
Data On them
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Hart, Charles
>We have found a strange situation with Tapes in our library
>I'm hoping that some one could clarify what we are seeing...
>
>ts
We have two identical TSM Server (AIX 5.2 / p630 / TSM 5.2.3.5) They were both
@ TSM 5.2.3.4 then we upgraded to 5.2.3.5 on the same day. One of the servers
has been running just fine (TSM Server1). When the other TSM server (TSM
Server2) runs Expiration it grinds to a halt with in an hour reg
We say the same issue with versions 5.1.7.3 / 5.2.3. *Some 4.1 versions) Now @
5.2.3.5 and a 150GB DB takes about 45min... It use to take hours
Regards,
Charles
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Prather, Wanda
Sent: Tuesday, Januar
We are in the midst of our Annual Budget planning and know were are
understaffed. The question then is there a "Ratio" of Backup Data Maintained
to number of Backup Administrators? A few of us have googled and Gartnered,
and come up with nothing. Has anyone on this list seen such a thing?
Th
Thank you all for your input. Seems like the Backup World is big enough, you
would think Gartner would publish a Basic Ratio as they do for SAN admins to
disk. (Like many places our mngt thinks Gartner is King) but this exercise we
go through annually is to get upper mngt's but in).
Have a gre
(Domino, MS-SQL, Oracle on both AIX and SUN).
BTW, when it comes to TSM, I don't just do the administration of the TSM
servers. In many cases, I am doing the client installs, as well.
FWIW, TSM is only 40% of by "job duties" as defined in my job description.
"Hart, Charles"
Think that depends on what you have set ResourceUtilization to in your client's
dsm.opt file. If you set Resource Utilization to 1 then one drive set to 2
then 2 drives. If you go to disk first you can set to as many as you like
(with in reason and or based on the number of filesystems your cl
g, and documentation. But on a
day-to-day process, we treat TSM with benign negelct here.
Tom Kauffman
NIBCO, Inc
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Hart, Charles
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 8:09 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject:
TDP's of most
> flavors (Domino, MS-SQL, Oracle on both AIX and SUN).
>
> BTW, when it comes to TSM, I don't just do the administration of the TSM
> servers. In many cases, I am doing the client installs, as well.
>
> FWIW, TSM is only 40% of by "job duties"
Did a quick query on the list, but not quite finding what I'm looking for. IN
the near future we may be migrating our primary DC to a new location across
town. The DC migration will be a phased approach over 1-3yrs. We plan on
purchasing a New Backup Server and 3494library (Similar Cfg as Cur
We had a similar situation, for us the WIn SysObjs were killing us. Being that
the Win SysObj change on almost a daily basis and there's quite a few per Win
Server, we created a Mngt class just for Windows sysobj and put a specific
retention of 10 Versions. We also do a Server side Client Opt
Once you update the client to see the new policy the next time the client is
contacted for backup the other 80days of backup files for that client will
expire. Only thing to watch out for is have many clients going through this
expire process at the same time your log can fill...
Regards,
Cha
Our Intel team will be using robocopy to move data from one Windows Dick vol to
a new one. In the past we have seen TSM Backup the data that was moved, even
thought the data has already been backed up before. An example would be...
file1.txt has been on the D: Drive and has 10 Active Backup Co
it as deleted.
Doug Thorneycroft
Systems Analyst
Computer Technology Section
County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County
(562) 699-7411 Ext. 1058
FAX (562) 699-6756
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Hart, Charles
, watch out - robocopy will blow it
out of the water (and fill up the event log to boot!)
-steve
-Original Message-
From: Hart, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 5:10 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Migrating Windows File Data Question
Thanks for
Another way is to move your TSM Instance and DB to new 64bit system then
upgrade your TSM binaries to 64bit.
Here's roughly what we did to go from and H70 to a p630
On Existing H70 Upgrade OS from AIX 4.3.3 to 5.2
Build new p630
Did a sysback on H70
Physically moved SSA Drawer with our TSM DB Vo
We have a windows client domain that writes to its own tape pool for about 200+
Windows clients (Collocation On Primary Tape Pool / Off on Copy Pool). We
would like to split the clients out in to additional domains for restore
purposes.
The question I have is how do move the data of client A
Pools
Try this:
- Upd node to new domain. TSM will not magically migrate data, but it will
know to restore previous data from old tape pool etc.
- MOVE NODEDATA to move data for that node only from old stgpool to new stgpool
good luck!
Paul
Quoting "Hart, Charles" <[EMAIL PROTE
Our management is asking us to look at converting our IBM 3592J to 9940B. (no
comment)... Most of our remote sites use 9940B drives with Netbackup, and in
the past year we have seen many 9940b drives replaced (10 out of 40) in the
past year, many tapes getting stuck etc... I have heard from ot
Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Hart, Charles
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 11:07 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: STK 9940B Tape Drive Exp with TSM?
Our management is asking us to look at converting our IBM 3592J to 9940B.
(no comment)... Most of our remote sites use 9940B d
We had something similar.
1) Created a new domain with all set to Nolimit,
2) Then upd the node to be in that dom.
3) renamed the original node name to something like xxx.old
4) regged a new node name using the orig node name in its orig dom.
Onlly downside is that doing restores prior to the
We have been a TSM shop for years (no problem with it) but are being asked to
look at Netbackup. Part of our evaluation is going to consist of a survey to
our platform admins who do our Archives / RMAN / Restores etc. We do use NBU
at many remote locations which only some of our platform admin
m that all of the inactive versions, including ones
of deleted files, rebound correctly, so that nothing expired from that
point?
-steve
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Hart, Charles
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 9:08 AM
To: ADSM-L
The Lic # is based on CPU count. You can get a list / count of backup nodes
from TSM but not the processor count.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Timothy Hughes
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 10:46 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subje
Ooops yep... q lic will give you count but how do you validate to the actual
CPU's you have?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Lawrence Clark
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 10:52 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: how do we tell ho
Expire_perf - TSM 24 hour report for MSPSTG1.CORP generated at 04/07/2005
08:50:26 on MSPM1BBKUP02 covering 2005-04-06 08:50 to 2005-04-07 08:50
Server name: MSPSTG1, platform: AIX-RS/6000, version: 5.2.4.0, date/time:
04/07/2005 08:50:27
ACTIVITY Date Objects Examined Up/Hr
--
VOLUMES.STGPOOL_NAME =
STGPOOLS.STGPOOL_NAME AND ((STGPOOLS.DEVCLASS='3592TAPE')) GROUP BY
STGPOOLS.STGPOOL_NAME, STGPOOLS.MAXSCRATCH
-Ken Mueller
-----Original Message-
From: Hart, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 11:58 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subj
When I run the following slect
SELECT STGPOOLS.STGPOOL_NAME, STGPOOLS.MAXSCRATCH,
Count(STGPOOLS.MAXSCRATCH) as "Allocated_SCRATCH" FROM STGPOOLS
STGPOOLS, VOLUMES VOLUMES WHERE VOLUMES.STGPOOL_NAME =
STGPOOLS.STGPOOL_NAME AND ((STGPOOLS.DEVCLASS='3592TAPE')) GROUP BY
STGPOOLS.STGPOOL_NAME, STGPO
We are wrestling with a couple issue that maybe some one could shed some
light on
1) We are seeing insufficient space in target copy storage pool message
but when you look at the non-collocated copy pool vols there are many
tapes with 0.1% with a filling status, so there should be sufficient
s
Here's a crude script, but it works. We have it in cron to run daily.
#!/bin/ksh -x
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/usr/bin/dsmadmc -ID=query -PA=query1 q event \domain \* type=client
Begindate=-1 > /tmp/sched.log
cat /tmp/mecc.log|grep -v ANS8000I |grep -v ANS8002I |mailx -s "TSM
Backup Results" $MAILLI
We ran a immediate action sched to archive files form a Windows server.
The archive was complete, but when you go in to the TSM BA Client GUI
the archive does not show up in the retrieve options. The Archive
finished 6hrs ago... The dsmsched log reflects that the archive was
indeed ran and complet
erver Archive Complete but Not showing as
Retrievable.
Verify that the node name you used for the archive is the same as the
name that is used for launching the GUI.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Hart, Charles
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 20
Migrate diskpools to tape (By Migrating to tape first your backup copy
pools will have current backup data)
Backup Storage Pools
Backup TSM Db
Backup Volhist
Move drmedia
Expire Inventory
Reclamations
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Be
We are looking at using the SNMP ability of TSM, but in the Configure
Information (below) it states to use SNMP for TSM the Receiver Trap
system has to be AIX Win or OS2? Maybe I'm missing something.. Does
this mean that if our SNMP Receiver systems is Sun we can not use SNMP
to monitor TSM events
I've read through this thread and need to implement as our retention for WIn2k is 180
Current and Deleted. I have created the separate management class and pointed it to
the copy group etc. My question is what is the proper syntax to add the client opt to
an existing client option set on the T
XCLUDE statement to a client option set, the
correct
syntax is:
define clientopt option_set_name inclexcl "include c:\proj\text\devel.*".
-Original Message-
From: Hart, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
clexcl "include c:\proj\text\devel.*".
-Original Message-
From: Hart, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: System Object / Mgmt. Classes / Policy Sets / Backup Groups
- - What's the best way??
I
One other note I forgot to mention. When we did the Upgrade via SMIT, it installed
the new TSM code but did not run the Upgrade DB portion. I spoke to Tivoli Tech and
they stated you have to manually run ./dsmserv upgrade db...
-Original Message-
From: Kamp, Bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
xcessively long and that time was
reduce by changes made in V5.1.6.
Kyle
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Hart, Charles
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 1:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: upgrade to TSM 5.1 from TSM 4.1
One
We went from 4.1.5 to 5.1.5 on AIX 4.3.3 ML10. Our TSM DB upgrade portion took approx
7hrs on a 4-way RS/6000 H80. The only things I can thing of keep in mind is the paths
for DRM if you use, and when you upgrade to 5.1.0 first reg licenses, then 5.1.5.
Regards,
Charles
-Original Messag
Our Upgrade Info
TSM Server 4.1.6 to 5.1.5
TSM DB Size 72GB
Hardware
RS/6000 H80 4-Way 2GB RAM
Time = 8hrs
-Original Message-
From: Brecton Whitten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 2:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM DB from 4.x to 5.1.5
Could anyone
We have created a new domain, policy set, mngt classes and Stgpools for existing
Backup Clients to be a part of a domain that consists of backup clients that are
tested at an off-site DR Facility. We did an upd node to the existing nodes to the
new dom and the backups are going to the new stgpo
Our management thinks we should switch to Veritas because "It's easier to Implement",
your management doesn't seem to understand that the RMAN piece is probably the most
complicated piece of and DB backup.
-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, F
We use to use journaled mirrored file systems, but found that Raw Mirrored local
provides us better I/O, now we are using Raw volumes on EMC Disk for stgpools which
works even better because the disk is mirrored on the back end of the EMC Symetrix.
-Original Message-
From: William Ro
Is ot possible to skip the 5.1.6.0 and go 4.2.1.8 --> 5.1.5.0 --> then 5.1.6.1 being
that 5.6.0 is suppose to be buggy.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Duempert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 9:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: From TIVsm 4.2.1.8 to TIVsm 5.
And now a boatload of e-mail about blank e-mails. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Mario Behring [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 12:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Multiple Emails from this group
Now that you guys mentioned this yesterday I also rece
1 - 100 of 322 matches
Mail list logo
