Eric,
You no longer need direct query because when you enter the
TSM Server using the NODENAME that contains the backup,
the SQL Server name will automatically appear in the tree view.
In other words, DP for SQL will query the TSM Server
for all backups under the NODENAME as opposed to
just the SQ
Eric,
You cannot do this. You must log on to the TSM Server under the
NODENAME that performed the backups. The "Direct Query"
function in version 1 worked the same way.
It allowed you to query a specific server and database name,
but the NODENAME queried was always the one logged in to.
Data Prote
Zoltan,
Do you mean the TSM Server setting on the NODENAME
called "BACKDELETE=YES"? Even it is set to NO,
it will not keep your good backups from expiring.
The BACKDELETE=YES setting is only important for
cleaning up backups when there was a failure during
a backup and there are temporary objects
You could create a new domain or you could just create
separate management classes to meet your needs and use
the INCLUDE option to bind those objects to the
specific management class.
In general, take a look at the book where it discusses
policy recommendations:
Because log and set objects are
Mesut,
The Data Protection for Exchange client backs up
Exchange Server database files (.EDB, .STM) and log files (.LOG)
according to Microsoft specifications.
"qmanager.dat" is not a file that is part of the
Exchange Server architecture.
Thanks,
Del
---
Brian,
There will not be a new release for 5.2.2 for Windows.
There was no need to rebuild the code to support Domino 6.5.
Data Protection for Domino 5.1.5 on Windows supports
both Domino 6.5 and Windows 2003.
Thanks,
Del
> Has anyone heard
Gerald,
It is normal behavior. Is there a reason you are concerned?
The "external" modification date and time stamp on a Domino database
is not really interesting. The important date/time stamps for a
Domino database are kept internally to the database itself.
The "internal" dates are the ones tha
Douglas,
How are you performing the "non-TDP" backup of the Domino databases?
Are you using the normal file-level Backup/Archive client?
Here are a few points to consider:
1.) In order to take a "non-TDP" backup of Domino server databases
and guarantee a backup with full integrity, you will n
Mohan,
You don't mention version, release levels of the TSM Server.
Also, I assume you are referring to Data Protection for
Exchange... since you mention "storage groups" in your problem
description. It is always good to include that type of information
when posting to this list.
Named pipes shou
Steve,
It doesn't work quite like that.
Client applications do not have access to those TSM Server "statistics".
A TSM client tells the TSM Server that it wants to back up an object that
has a certain estimated size. The TSM Server then accepts or rejects
the object creation based upon the estimat
Marc,
This will probably work fine... however...
please keep in mind that Data Protection for Domino version 1.1.1
is out of support. I encourage you to upgrade to the latest version.
Thanks,
Del
> Thanks...however I should of asked is TDP f
Matt,
Data Protection for Exchange was run and tested in an
Exchange 2003/Windows 2003 MSCS environment.
When setting up the failover for the scheduler service, you also need to
set up registry replication so that upon a failover, the password stored
in
the registry is copied to the failover node
Matt,
I would uninstall both clients and re-install them.
Start with the base client, followed by the
Data Protection for SQL client. (You might consider
upgrading to Data Protection for SQL 5.2.1 since
that is the latest version.)
If the problem still occurs, check the DSIERROR.LOG file
to see i
omino data directory.
We have this documented in a knowledge base article titled:
"Running multiple Data Protection for Domino domdsmc instances"
Go to:
http://www.ibm.com/us/
Search for:
1114638
Thanks,
Del
------------
Del Hoobler
IB
Marc,
This looks familiar. This might be fixed.
You are running an old version of the product.
You should upgrade to the 5.1.5 version. You can find it here:
FTP Site:
ftp.software.ibm.com
Directory:
/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/tivoli-data-protection/domino/v515/win32/
Than
Zoltan,
We are looking at ways to help automate this
separation of work, but there is nothing currently in plan.
Until then, you will need to build this into
your automated backup scripts.
Thanks,
Del
Del Hoobler
IBM Corporation
[EMAIL
Robert,
Looks like Data Protection for SQL is not
talking to the local SQL server correctly.
What happens when you issue this command:
TDPSQLC QUERY SQL *
Can you connect to the SQL server that way?
Are you running on a cluster?
Is it a named instance?
Have you tried specifying the SQL Serve
here things might be going wrong.
Thanks,
Del
----
Del Hoobler
IBM Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/11/2004
10:59:28 AM:
> Hi del
>
> When running TDPSQLC QUERY SQ
Niklas,
Goran is correct. You need to make sure that MAXNUMMP for the
NODENAME you are using for your SQL backups is set to at least
to the number of stripes you are using. Also, turning on
collocation by filespace will ensure that data for different stripes
remains on different tapes so that th
Gavin,
You cannot extend the retention period of a single backup
but leave all of the others as they were.
Think of a DP for SQL backup being like a file backup.
The same management class settings apply to all
versions of a particular file.
You can change the retention period of ALL of the curren
Mehdi,
Data Protection for Exchange version 5.2.1 will back up
and restore Exchange 2003 databases. Exchange 2003
backup and restore is very similar to Exchange 2000
backup and restore. The only difference is when
you have an Exchange 2003 Recovery Storage Group.
Here is the Data Protection for E
Del Hoobler
IBM Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/24/2004
12:33:05 PM:
> We have been facing this issue, that Domino tx log recoveries work from
> the console but fail from termina
Kevin,
This isn't much to go by.
I would try the SQL Enterprise Manager backup tool
to see if it behaving in a similar way. If it is behaving
the same way, try Microsoft support. If not, then try
calling IBM service. IBM Service will need a trace to
find out where the hang is occurring.
If you wo
Mehdi,
You need to have Data Protection for Exchange version 5.2.1
in order to back up and restore Exchange 2003.
With Data Protection for Exchange version 5.2.1 you can back up
and restore at the database level. And so, you would restore
the Public Folder Store database in order to restore the
p
Mehdi,
You need to create the storage group and database with
the exact same names on the target Exchange server first.
After you create the storage group and database
on the target server, you need to set the following
option on the new database on the target machine
using the database: Propertie
In regards to this response...
Mehdi was asking about Public Folders.
You mentioned the Recovery Storage Group as a solution.
The Recovery Storage Group only works with Mailbox databases.
It does not work with Public Folder databases.
Thanks,
Del
---
Zosimo
A very important question you need to answer is:
Are you are running Data Protection for SQL
backups using multiple stripes?
If you are, then you need to keep the data on separate tapes.
That is because during restore, you will also be using
striping and therefore those tapes will be moun
Zosi,
Please read the Data Protection for Exchange User's Guide,
Appendix C - Advanced restore procedures.
There is a section titled "Individual Mailbox Restore".
Here is a URL for the Data Protection for Exchange User's Guide:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/StorageManagerforMail5.2.1.
Zosi,
If you plan to keep using a single stripe on your
Data Protection for SQL backups, then you should
be able to turn collocation off without ill effects
to any particular Data Protection for SQL restore.
You may affect the ability to restore two separate
SQL Server backups simultaneously, but
Kevin,
Try searching the IBM knowledge base:
Go to:
www.ibm.com
Search for:
ACO5422E
You will find seven matches. One of them actually shows the error:
[ODBC SQL Server Driver][DBNETLIB]ConnectionRead (WrapperRead())
Looks like a direct match. The IBM article will point you to
Microsoft
stall it before installing Data Protection
for SQL. Check the KB article (1160496) for details.
Thanks,
Del
----
Del Hoobler
IBM Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/05/2004
09:35
Jim,
Please note you are running an older, unsupported
version of Data Protection for Exchange.
You should download and install the latest version,
which is Data Protection for Exchange verion 5.2.1.
There is an appendix called Advanced Restore Procedures
that explain how to restore an Exchange 5
Robert,
You will need to add the "/RECOVery=No" option
to the restore of the full. If your physical environment
on the target system does not match the original system,
you may also have to use the "/RELOCATE=" and "/TO=" options.
Thanks,
Del
=NO parameter. The last restore operation
should be run with the /RECOVERY=YES parameter
(which is the default).
Take a look at the "RECOVERY" option in the
User's Guide. It explains this for you.
Thanks,
Del
------------
Del Hoobler
IBM Cor
Robert,
You do not need a SLEEP statement between the
two separate Data Protection for SQL commands.
Thanks,
Del
Del Hoobler
IBM Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/23/
Yiannakis,
Saturday.
If you want to restore it to a later point,
you will need to specify /RECOVERY=NO on the
restore of the full and then restore the last
differential backup with /RECOVERY=YES (default).
Thanks,
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manage
William,
Go to:
http://www.ibm.com/us/
Search for:
"a required Microsoft Exchange database log file could not be found"
Thanks,
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/24/2004
11:58:48 AM:
>
>
> No I am doing
store I do a second restore with the "difffull"
parameter
> instead of "full" ?
> Thanks
> Yiannakis
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Del Hoobler
> Sent: 24 March 2004 15:33
>
Wayne,
Many customers that I have talked to use one of two methods:
1. Create a secondary TSM Node name (for example: EXCSERVER1_MONTHLY)
and create special management classes to to define the policy
that you want. Then, run a separate FULL (or COPY) backup once
a month using the seconda
Joe,
There is not a Data Protection client for Groupwise,
however, take a look at the GWBackup tool available from Novell:
http://www.novell.com/documentation/lg/gw55/index.html?page=/documentation/lg/gw55/gw55mnt/data/a3n60nr.html
Thanks,
Del
-
Moses,
Are you using Data Protection for SQL?
It is a specialized TSM client that will perform online
backup and restore of Microsoft SQL Server databases.
The User's Guide for that book will help to explain
how to set it up.
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/StorageManagerforDatabases5.2.
se... I would start there.
Thanks,
Del
------------
Del Hoobler
IBM Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/02/2004
09:29:27 AM:
> Hi Aaron,
>
> I didn't really expect so many replies,
David,
Check this out:
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techinfo/tips/administration/logfilegrowth.asp
Thanks,
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/06/2004
10:40:44 AM:
> Can you reference me an MS SQL doc or something
Chris,
I have a few comments:
RESTORE VERIFYONLY checks to see that the backup set is complete
and that all volumes are readable. RESTORE VERIFYONLY does NOT
check the structure of the data on the volumes.
I always wondered how this is a "verification" of a restore
if you don't really restore th
Eric,
Go to:
www.ibm.com
Search for:
+TDP +SQL +ANS1017E
Thanks,
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/19/2004
08:50:59 AM:
> Hi *SM-ers!
> Our SQL Server guys are migrating several databases to a new server
Jeff,
There is nothing you should need to do in regards to the
SQL Server to use multiple stripes. Data Protection for SQL
informs the SQL Server how many stripes it would like to use.
The SQL Server completely determines how the data is
fed to each striped session. Data Protection for SQL
will op
Eric,
That is not correct.
It starts from the bottom and works its way up.
If it finds a "match" it stops processing.
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/20/2004
09:04:06 AM:
> Hi Kevin!
> I know that it reads botto
Fred,
If you have reset the password, you will need to store it again.
You can do this by running a command like this:
TDPSQLC QUERY TSM /TSMPASSWORD=password
This assumes you are using the DSM.OPT file in the
Data Protection for SQL installation directory.
Also.. version 2.2 is pretty old.
Jeff,
This is taken directly from the Microsoft SQL Server
Book Online documentation:
--
Question:
Can you restore a SQL Server 2000 database backup to a SQL Server 7.0
server?
Answer:
No. The only way to move a SQL Server 2000 database to a SQL Server 7.0
Hello Peter,
There are two packages for Data Protection for SQL.
There is a 32-bit package and a 64-bit package.
Are you trying to install the 32-bit package on a
64-bit machine or the 64-bit package on a 32-bit machine?
There is installation code to protect against this,
which is most likely what
Joe,
There is no way to change the number of retries for
Data Protection for Exchange. This is currently hardcoded
into the product. The intent is to add more intelligent
retry in the future. This is a known work item for the future.
Thanks,
Del
-
Eric,
Remove the work "start /B" from the script file.
Instead of this:
start /B domdsmc selective * /subdir=yes /adsmoptfile=dsm.daily.opt
/logfile=domdsm.daily.log dominc.daily.log
Use this:
domdsmc selective * /subdir=yes /adsmoptfile=dsm.daily.opt
/logfile=d
Robert,
Your question is slightly confusing... but I think you are asking
if there is a way to query full backups for a certain date.
The answer is no. If this is something you need, you could
most likely write some TSM Server SQL queries to get
access to that information.
If you are asking a di
René,
As you may know, a single Data Protection for SQL backup
is made up of multiple objects on the TSM Server.
This error message means that the the number of objects that
make up the specific object you are trying to restore
is not correct. This should not normally happen, but may occur
if the
Marc,
Go here:
www.ibm.com
Search for:
ACD0057E
If you did that already, and it didn't help,
it may mean that the upgrade had a problem and
the "paid" license file was overwritten or deleted.
You should be able to just get the "paid" license off
of the original "Paid" CD and place it i
Rainer,
Your include statements should look like this:
INCLUDE *.NSF* MCNAME
INCLUDE *.NTF* MCNAME
Notice the additional "*" after "NSF" and "NTF".
This is because a Data Protection for Lotus Domino
backup is made up of two TSM Server backup objects.
For example,
MAILFILE.NSF
MA
Moses,
When performing Domino Server database file backups,
Data Protection for Domino uses standard TSM policy management.
That is, you can think of it like you do TSM policy management
for files when using the standard TSM Backup/Archive client.
If you are not familiar with how that works, you m
Kevin,
No. You do not need to run differential backups.
Thanks,
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/19/2004
09:49:31 AM:
> If we do a full database backup on sql server, then a log backup hourly,
> would we need to
Keep in mind that Data Protection for Informix is
an API which implements the Open Group Backup Services
application program interface (Open Group XBSA) functions.
Data Protection for Informix does not provide a CLI or GUI
because the interface is provided from Informix.
Backups and restore are dri
Copperfield,
Are you using the "/EXCSERVER=virtual-exchange-server-name"
command-line option? When running in a clustered environment,
you need to specify the name of the virtual Exchange server name.
For example, from the CLI it would be:
TDPEXCC BACKUP * FULL /EXCSERVER=EXCVIRTSERV
For the
Copperfield,
The API that is failing is a call to one of the standard
backup/restore APIs. I looked up the error message that you
pasted into the ADSM-L append. These messages can be found in the
Microsoft SDK file "esebkmsg.h".
-
//
// MessageId: hrCouldNotConnect
//
// MessageText:
//
// Un
Sujay,
You should look at the latest version of the User' Guide:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tivihelp/index.jsp?toc=/com.ibm.itstorage.doc/toc.xml
Look on the left-hand side for "Storage Manager for Databases".
Thanks,
Del
"AD
Natthakriss,
Yes. It is part of IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for Databases.
It is called Data Protection for Informix:
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/tivoli/products/storage-mgr-db/
Informix certified Data Protection for Informix provides centralized,
on-line, incremental backup capabilities f
René,
There is nothing similar for Data Protection for Exchange.
Thanks,
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/27/2004
02:48:23 AM:
> Hello,
>
> does anybody knows of the DIFFESTIMATE parameter exists in the TdP fo
Yiannakis,
If you are referring to the registry entries under here:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\IBM\ADSM\CurrentVersion\BackupClient\Nodes\
then you can delete the entry underneath that branch
that matches your nodename. You will need to store it again
before running Data Protection for SQL f
Niklas,
Yes. Exchange 2003 with the recently released SP1 is supported.
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/07/2004
04:27:54 AM:
> Hello
>
> Does anyone know if Exchange2003 with SP1 is supported? We are
> runnin
Dean,
You should be able to run a COPY or DBCOPY backup without
affecting your FULL plus INCREMENTAL backup scheme.
Something else must be going on here. Are there any
maintenance tasks that might be running in between
the COPY and the next INCREMENTAL backup? (like DEFRAG?)
You said that you see
Del Hoobler
IBM Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/14/2004
06:29:46 AM:
> Hi everyone,
> I need to restore a users mail database using TDP for Lotus
Notes.
> Prior to resto
Tom,
"it's not happening" is not much to go on. :-)
Can you get more details on what is not working?
What do you see in the TDPEXC.LOG file?
What errors are you getting?
Does the user-id that owns the Windows Scheduler
Service have enough authority to back up
the Exchange server and access the Wi
Tom,
Can you please get the answers to these questions
from your people?
1. What do you see in the TDPEXC.LOG file?
2. What errors messages are you getting?
Check the output the TDPEXC.LOG file and the
output of the TDPEXCC command?
3. Does the userid that owns the Windows Scheduler
Se
Tom,
This isn't the problem. Data Protection for Exchange
automatically ships and installs the TSM API.
You do not need to install the TSM BA client
unless you decide to the use the TSM BA client scheduler.
Please refer to my previous append to get more
details about the problem.
Thanks,
Del
-
Moses,
First, the TSM Server handles all of the tape
management for you. The TSM Server knows on which
tape any specific version of any backup exists.
If the client has queried the TSM Server, and says
that it cannot find a backup, then it most likely has
expired, which means it is out of the TSM
Bill,
Yes. This is possible. It is described in the
Data Protection for Domino User's Guide.
There is an Appendix called "Advanced restore procedures"
that discusses the details.
Thanks,
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
Matt,
Before doing the restore, on the Exchange server to which you
will perform the restore to, you need to create the
Storage Groups and databases exactly as they appeared
on the original server (the upper/lower casing of the
names also needs to exactly match).
You may also need to mark the data
Moses,
You might want to read through the section in
Chapter 1 called "SQL Server database backup".
It talks about the different types of SQL Server backups,
including how to back up the log.
You can't think of SQL server backups as "files".
They are "blobs" of data that are stored on the TSM Ser
Bill,
Data Protection for Domino will not work remotely in Windows.
This is a restriction of Domino server and its API.
This is documented in a KB article.
Go to WWW.IBM.COM, and search for:
+TDP +DOMINO +GUI +CRASH
Thanks,
Del
---
"ADSM: Dist
Bill,
> 1) In the alternate server dsm.opt file should the NODename be the same
as
> in the production server dsm.opt ?
>
Yes. The NODENAME should be the same.
> 2) Do I need to register the alternate server node name on the TSM
server
> ?
> eg. register ALT_SERVER_DOMINO domain MAIL passw
Bill,
Sure. It is possible to have a daily scheduled script
that performs a restore with REPLACE. I will let others
on the list respond with their "real-life" experiences
in doing this.
Thanks,
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Todd,
I have embedded some answers below.
Thanks,
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/24/2004
10:39:59 AM:
> I am working up my plan to backup our new Exchange 2003 storage groups.
> Our environment includes:
> Exc
Todd,
Answers embedded.
Thanks,
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/24/2004
11:17:55 AM:
> Del,
> Thanks.. follow up question...
> You said...
> >>
> Data Protection for Exchange performs incremental and
> differen
Todd,
Again, you don't need to worry about it. When Data Protection
for Exchange signals that it will start a backup,
the Exchange Server starts a new "set of logs".
That is, the current transaction logs are no longer written to
and are marked "full" and backed up (even though
there may be some un
Mark,
Data Protection for SQL does not support ARCHIVE.
It only supports BACKUP.
You can use a second NODENAME like you suggested or...
you can also look into using SET type backups which get
a unique name and can be bound to a separate management class.
Thanks,
Del
---
John,
This is normal.
SQL Server is pre-formatting the files in preparation for the restore.
Data Protection for SQL restores a small bit of information that
the SQL Server requires to properly set up and preformat the files.
After that, Data Protection for SQL must wait around until the
SQL Serve
Donald,
Are you running Data Protection for SQL on the
same physical machine that is currently running the
SQL Server? You will need to run Data Protection for SQL
on node2 if the SQL Server is currently running on node2.
If you are, verify that you have the correct permissions,
to run a backup (S
Patricia,
You will need Data Protection for Exchange version 5.2.1
in order to back up Exchange Server 2003.
You can find that information here:
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/entdocview.wss?uid=swg21157215
(Data Protection for Exchange information is at the bottom this article.)
Thanks,
Del
Moses,
This has nothing to do with inactivated and/or expiring data.
It has to do with the deletion of temporary TSM Server objects
that are sometimes created under certain circumstances.
Did you set the BACKDEL=YES parameter for those TSM nodes when
you set them up the on the TSM Server?
The def
See my earlier response to this append.
There is also something in the append below that is not correct
that I wanted to point out.
Data Protection for SQL 5.2.1 does not "manage the backups and
delete the expired backup by himself". That was true with the
very old version 1 of the product. But s
Pattie,
Go here:
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManagerforMail.html
Search for:
+windows +crash +domino
There are a few articles here that could help.
Thanks,
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[
---
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/21/2004
04:16:01 PM:
> Guys & especially Del Hoobler ;o),
>
> New to Informix backups. One of our internal customers has an Informix
> consultant in who has never used TSM before, and is looking to tr
Robert,
This means that the Exchange Server thinks that an
Exchange backup is already being run on that storage group.
That could mean one of two things:
1. A backup is actually still running on that storage group.
...or...
2. A previous backup has hung or prematurely ended.
If a prev
Etienne,
No, you don't need to uninstall it. There are ways to
exclude anti-virus software from "interfering" at startup.
You might try going to:
www.ibm.com
Search for:
+tdp +domino +virus
If the suggestions there don't help, please call IBM support.
Thanks,
Del
-
Bill,
All I can say is that Microsoft found a problem
in MDAC that they had to fix. Every time we have seen the
"[DBNETLIB]ConnectionRead (WrapperRead())" error
when backing up with Data Protection for SQL,
it has turned out to be KB827452. I think I remember
something about registry entries being
Bill,
Did you try this?
tdpsqlc backup dbname full /sqlserver=tcp:server-name.abc.com
for example:
tdpsqlc backup master full /sqlserver=tcp:couples.endicott.ibm.com
What happens?
If you can't get it working, please ask that the PMR be forwarded
to IBM Level 2 support. Level 2 can gathe
James,
You should be backing up all of the Storage Groups on your
Exchange server that need to be protected. This is accomplished
on the CLI with an "*".
For example:
TDPEXCC BACKUP * FULL
Data Protection for Exchange will enumerate all of the Storage Groups,
and back each one up. There are sam
Chris,
I remember you asking about this last year as well.
You are correct that Data Protection for SQL does not have
a "VERIFYONLY" function at this time. To be completely honest
we have only heard this request from one or two customers.
Since it means that you need to read and restore all of th
Luc,
Data Protection for WAS is a "separately" orderable product
even though the interface is integrated into the TSM base client.
When you purchased the Data Protection for WAS "product",
you should have received a CD in the mail that has the
installation package containing the required license f
Luc,
In order to obtain a "Try and Buy" license,
contact your IBM/Tivoli representative.
Thanks,
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/03/2004
08:45:23 AM:
> thanks Del ..
>
> I ordered the license ... so I should rec
Duane,
H... what version of the book are you looking it?
In the 5.2.1 version of the Data Protection for Exchange User's Guide
that I am looking at, the MSCS considerations are still in there.
There is a section titled:
"Running Data Protection for Exchange on a Microsoft Cluster Server
(MS
Kirk,
Data Protection for Exchange will only create one session
for each instance that you run. If there is an error
during a backup, it will retry up to a maximum of 4 attempts.
There must be something else going on here.
I suggest calling IBM support.
Thanks,
Del
-
Bill,
Microsoft SQL Server allows you to have multiple "named"
instances of the SQL Server running at the same time on
the same machine. Each "instance" has its own set
of system and user databases. Each "instance" is identified
by a unique name.
Logically, you can think of each SQL Server "insta
801 - 900 of 1716 matches
Mail list logo
