appreciated.
Thanks,
--David Nash
Systems Administrator
The GSI Group
memory or increasing
the pagefile? This server has a RAID5 partition that
contains about 100 GB of small files.
Thanks,
--David Nash
Systems Administrator
The GSI Group
he dsm.opt?
This is an incremental. We had no problems running the first full
backup. The server is a single 400Mhz processor with 128MB of RAM.
Thanks,
--David Nash
Systems Administrator
The GSI Group
- Original Message -
From: "Chibois, Herve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
Thank you, the memoryefficientbackup param did the
trick. I will look at the other params that you
mentioned and see why our implementer did that..
Thanks again,
--David Nash
Systems Administrator
The GSI Group
- Original Message -
From: "Chibois, Herve" <[EMAIL P
,
the amount of changed data would be small. Is it a good
idea in this case to turn on client compression? Any
suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks,
--David Nash
Systems Administrator
The GSI Group
The boxes range in size for 1G to 45G. But, the
amount of daily change is small. I really like the
idea of having the data here. That way, if we need to
we can rebuild the box here and take it to the remote site.
--David Nash
Systems Administrator
The GSI Group
- Original Message
using client
compression. "It doen't hurt to try it."
We will be trying our first site this weekend. If anyone
whats to know how it went, email me OTL next week.
Thanks Again,
--David Nash
Systems Administrator
The GSI Group
- Original Message -
From: "Palm
.0.2en0
192.168.0 192.168.0.2en0
192.168.1 192.168.1.2en1
In this example, the default route goes to a device
on the 192.168.0 network. This would be because that
network connects to the rest of the world (eg. the internet).
HTH
--David Nash
Systems Admi
Client or Server?
I have several RedHat 6.2 clients.
--David Nash
Systems Administrator
The GSI Group
- Original Message -
From: "Glass, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 4:19 PM
Subject: Red Hat Linux Support
have been running flawlessly ever since.
--David Nash
Systems Administrator
The GSI Group
- Original Message -
From: "Mahesh Tailor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 11:07 AM
Subject: Re: TSM and 3583 LTO Library
>
Thanks ALL...
--David Nash
Systems Administrator
The GSI Group
- Original Message -
From: "Cook, Dwight E" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: Mount Retention Period
> change it in the device c
Is there any way to change the mount retention
period for a drive in an automated library? If
so, how?
Thanks,
--David Nash
Systems Administrator
The GSI Group
noticing is that during the
day when the scheduler is not active, it is consuming
about 8.5% of the CPU. Why is this?
Thanks,
--David Nash
Systems Administrator
The GSI Group
13 matches
Mail list logo