Hi,
Is the concept of bare machine recovery applicable for z/OS and other
mainframe operating systems like zLinux?
Thank you,
Mehdi
Hi Mehdi,
If you are looking at CBMR and TBMR, then no. Does products don't support any
mainframe OS.
Best Regards
Christian Svensson
Cell: +46-70-325 1577
E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se
Supported Platform for CPU2TSM::
http://www.cristie.se/cpu2tsm-supported-platforms
FDR (and probably other mainframe backup products) support BMR.
>>> Mehdi Salehi 6/15/2011 5:49 AM >>>
Hi,
Is the concept of bare machine recovery applicable for z/OS and other
mainframe operating systems like zLinux?
Thank you,
Mehdi
On Jun 15, 2011, at 4:49 AM, Mehdi Salehi wrote:
> Hi,
> Is the concept of bare machine recovery applicable for z/OS and other
> mainframe operating systems like zLinux?
z/VM and, as far as I know, z/OS come with utilities designed to be booted when
the system is down; think of a "boot floppy" o
Hi,
sorry for being late!
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Timothy Hughes wrote:
>[...]
> Question - this may be obvious but I want to make absolutely sure
>
> Does exporting data at the same time it is backing up cause a issue?
>
> Example: I am exporting a client node from TSM SERVER A to TSM SERVER B an=
-Hans Christian Riksheim wrote: -
>If I have two customers connected to the same TSM-server, customer A
>can retrieve the data of customer B if he gets hold of a TSM admin
>password.
>
>Besides client side encryption, any method to prevent that?
I have done cross-system restores using a T
I'm interested in hearing from folks using it.
>From the presentation, I am uneasy at all the cmd-line DB2 setup commands
>required to use it, and wonder if it's suitable for a shop with no in-house
>DB2 expertise.
Once it's set up, how much time/expertise does it take to monitor/manage it?
I
The work to set it up really isnt that bad.
You setup the main TSM database, do a offline backup of it and restore it to
your secondary (standby) DB2 instance.
You then configure the following parameters on each database (you can get the
values by typing "db2 get db cfg for TSMDB1"):
HADR_LOCA
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Daniel
Sparrman
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 10:14 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: TSM 6.x and HADR
The work to set it up really isnt that bad.
You setup the main
Hi all,
I want to share this information with you regarding a new process for
entering TSM product enhancement requests.
Beginning June 11, 2011, the preferred method for all IBM Tivoli Software
clients interested in entering new Requests for Enhancements (RFEs) for a
majority of Tivoli Software
Hello,
I just learned that TSM Administrators no longer have to go through their IBM
Tivoli Sales Representatives to request changes/enhancements to TSM and I
thought I would share this information with you. As of June 11, 2011, The
Tivoli RFE Community page is available for almost all of the T
You do not have to create different scripts to accomplish this task.
Simply bundle your settings using appropriate servername stanzas in
dsm.sys and use a script (see http://www.dat.lrz.de/dat/dsm/scr/#mdsm,
"DSM multiple schedule daemons manager") to manage one or more schedule
daemons by separat
Where can one find what the "Operating System" default/built-in excludes
are for each OS? Or, better yet, are there such lists for anything other
than WINDOWS?
I ask this since on a Linux system, "Q INCLEXCL" only shows what is being
exclude via dsm.sys exclude statements. But on a Windows box,
On windows, the 'OS' default excludes are managed in the registry somewhere and
you could use tools like ntbackup to edit them.
On real operating systems, there are very few parts that you want to skip.
Usually on Solaris and Linux tmpfs (/tmp) is excluded, but other than that
everything.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Thomas Denier <
thomas.den...@jeffersonhospital.org> wrote:
> I have done cross-system restores using a TSM administrator account
> with system privilege, and the TSM client documentation indicates
> that I could have done the same thing if my account had policy pr
Can anyone who has converted from V5 to V6.2.2.0 or V6.2.2.2 on Win2K8 64b
confirm for me that you are running OK?
Have a customer who did the conversion from V5 on Win2K3 32b to V6.2.2.2 on
Win2K8 64b and new server hardware. Performance is measurably degraded.
Background processes are slow
16 matches
Mail list logo