Re: Disabling automatic mount processes

2010-09-26 Thread Xav Paice
- "Skylar Thompson" wrote: > Does disabling the library prevent library audits as well? Basically > I'm > trying to keep stuff from getting mounted and interfering with the > audit. Yes it would. If you're doing an 'audit library' use the checklabel=barcode option to make it a mile faster

Re: Need to understand TSM restoration concept.

2010-09-26 Thread Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT
Another way to look at it is TSM keeps a copy of every file on the server at the time of the backup. TSM knows what day it saw each file on the server. When you do a restore, either from the last backup or a point in time, TSM restores only the files that were present during the point you are

Re: Disabling automatic mount processes

2010-09-26 Thread Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT
We take the drives off-line during maintenance. We have restarted real and imagined libraries with no ill effects to TSM by simply taking the drives off-line. Off-line drives should not affect an audit. Andy Huebner -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.m

Re: Disabling automatic mount processes

2010-09-26 Thread Ray Carlson
For a Library to do its own audit, then yes you want to take the drives offline. However, you will need one drive online and empty when you want TSM to synchronize its Library audit with the physical library audit. Ray C On Sep 26, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT wrote: > We tak

Re: SV: Windows 2008 Cluster Backup won't start

2010-09-26 Thread Timothy Hughes
Thanks, Gary, Raymond, Christian and Richard for your responses. Looks like we got the Cluster backup to work the backup has been completing the last few nights. The configuration seem to be the issue Best Regards Tim On 9/23/2010 8:59 AM, Richard Sims wrote: Tim - We have no information on

Re: Tsm 6.2.1 windows client and vss issues

2010-09-26 Thread Timothy Hughes
Gary, Thanks This is good to know, I don't understand why earlier 6.x clients didn' t allow this. Best regards! On 9/23/2010 9:35 AM, Lee, Gary D. wrote: A little late responding, but 6.2.1 client doesn't necessarily resolve vss issues, but does allow the file level backups to continue after

Re: Novell Archive retrieval issue

2010-09-26 Thread Timothy Hughes
Zoltan Thanks, This worked and we got the the retrieval going, though we are still puzzled why the reverse order worked about a month ago during testing and not this time. Best Regards On 9/21/2010 10:36 AM, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote: The options (-subdir, -replace) go AFTER the RETRIEVE com

Re: Novell Archive retrieval issue

2010-09-26 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Were you renaming/changing the target of the restore? - Original Message - From: Timothy Hughes [timothy.hug...@oit.state.nj.us] Sent: 09/26/2010 03:47 PM AST To: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Cc: Zoltan Forray Subject: Re: Novell Archive retrieval issue Zoltan Thanks, This worked and w