Hi,
I had the same problem. Try define everything without any sn or wwn numbers, in
this direction:
Define library
Define drive
Define path (to library)
Define path (drive)
...
Regards,
Jakub
--
Jakub Głębicki
Senior IT Administrator
Bank DnB NORD Polska S.A.
__
Hi
I though this error was behind me … but not, I got an error message ANE4018E
(Session: 125660, Node: SCIF) Error processing
'/media/nss/DATA/Math/Mportnov/.. : file name too long
I double check that I had USEUNICODEFILENAMES NO in my dsm.opt but still got
the error.
Hi,
Just a quick question. How do you overview your NDMP backuper?
I have a TSM Server 6.1.3.1 based on Windows and 3 NetApp Servers. What version
of OS on the NetApp do I have no idea about.
But on each NetApp do I have everything from 7 Volumes to 25 Volumes to backup
every night.
And my Script
I've been using QUERY FILESPACES and comparing the "start of backup" and "end
of backup" times, as well as a QUERY PROCESS. If the "NAS Backup" processes
aren't running, then QUERY FILESPACES will show filespaces that were backed up
with end times that are the same as or later than the begin tim
Thanks for the information. It seems that SANergy gets fairly bad press
on this forum, or are there success stories out there too? And the
software seems ancient (last release in 2002?) Is it still a viable
solution?
I was hoping that a FILE library shared and managed by the TSM server
would ha
TSM server 5.4.1.0 running on Windows 2003.
I have an offsite copypool that has decided to no longer
do reclamation. I noticed that I had far more tapes in that pool that I
would have expected. I checked the pct_utilized numbers and saw that the
tapes varied from 9
When you query the process or mounts does it state that it is waiting on
a volume (input or output)? It is possible that one of them is
unavailable, and/or mounted by another process.
Thank you,
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behal
I recomend you do a move data with 99% tapes.
Regards
Jorge
> Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 11:11:34 -0400
> From: david.ty...@sgmc.org
> Subject: [ADSM-L] reclamation no longer working
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
>
> TSM server 5.4.1.0 running on Windows 2003.
>
> I h
SANergy, SAN-FS, SVC...Some products IBM brings to market are hits, some
aren't.
The two aggrivations we had with SANergy (and I'm not talking about my
current employer) were that it required a Windows host for CIFS, and a
UNIX host for NFS. (I think Solaris was the preferred UNIX at the time for
If your intent is to backup all the volumes on the filer, it may be good
to periodically backup the filer without an explicit list, so any new
filesystems are picked up. For example on a Saturday.
Then on Monday query the filesystems on the node and see if any haven't
backed up in the last day. An
Not necessarily related to the problem, but 5.4.5 includes a change to the
way the TSM serrver selects which offsite volumes to reclaim:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IC57009
[RC]
From:
"Tyree, David"
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
05/06/2010 08:12 AM
Subject:
[ADSM-L] rec
Nope, no mention of waiting on a tape and/or volume
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Rick Adamson
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 11:29 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] reclamation no longer working
When you query th
David,
Seeing as there have been many, many, fixes since you release I would
consider an upgrade to at least the most recent version of 5.4
As a matter of fact a couple of the 5.4.1.1 apars were reclamation
related.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21273797
Thank you,
~Rick
-
It's on the calender
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Rick Adamson
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 1:20 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] reclamation no longer working
David,
Seeing as there have been many, many, fi
I'm doing a move data now. Or trying too.
The process has been running for about 30 minutes with zero bytes moved.
Nothing showing from a q request, nothing showing from a q mount. All drives
online and plenty of mount points.
I would expect it to mount a scratch tape and start moving data pr
On May 6, 2010, at 1:48 PM, Tyree, David wrote:
> I'm doing a move data now. Or trying too.
>
> The process has been running for about 30 minutes with zero bytes moved.
> Nothing showing from a q request, nothing showing from a q mount. All drives
> online and plenty of mount points.
>
> I w
>> On Thu, 6 May 2010 11:11:34 -0400, "Tyree, David"
>> said:
> I've run the threshold up and down from a few percentage points up
> to 80-90% hoping something would change but no difference. I have
> plenty of scratch tapes and mount points.
Try running one at 99% and _no_ time limit, and exp
After about an hour of waiting the move data finally got rolling.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 2:12 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] reclamation no longer working
On
I found a freeware utility called WinAudit.exe
It collects system information on Windows Servers, including
processor information. It took me about 20 minutes to automate
the collection on all my clients using a simple batch file run
from my workstation.
The utility collects a huge amount of inf
Hi,
in TSM 6.1 I have had to updated the ODBC from TSM to DB2 ODBC and what is my
surprise the tables in DB2 are different than previous version, for example
auditocc doesn't exist any more. I have created a lot of queries and I would
like to know if IBM has provided the views or the db Schem
On May 6, 2010, at 5:12 PM, Francisco Molero wrote:
Hi,
in TSM 6.1 I have had to updated the ODBC from TSM to DB2 ODBC and
what is my surprise the tables in DB2 are different than previous
version, for example auditocc doesn't exist any more. I have created
a lot of queries and I would like to
> I'm doing a move data now. Or trying too.
> The process has been running for about 30 minutes with zero bytes moved.
> Nothing showing from a q request, nothing showing from a q mount. All drives
> online and plenty of mount points.
Have you tried to use straight command in foreground mode "m
22 matches
Mail list logo
