Hi All,
After upgrading TSM from 6.1.3.2 to 6.2.0.0 my TSM Server will not start
anymore, as shown below:
ANR7800I DSMSERV generated at 16:19:30 on Mar 5 2010.
Tivoli Storage Manager for AIX
Version 6, Release 2, Level 0.0
Licensed Materials - Property of IBM
(C) Copyright IBM
Richard - See doc APAR IC60968 as a likely.
Another Richard
On Mar 31, 2010, at 3:31 AM, Richard van Denzel wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> After upgrading TSM from 6.1.3.2 to 6.2.0.0 my TSM Server will not start
> anymore, as shown below:
>
>
>
> ANR7800I DSMSERV generated at 16:19:30 on Mar 5 20
Hi All,
My colleague is archiving some data by gui interface - dsmj ,
how can I know the finish of this archive if I can not see the gui interface
and he does not close gui.
Thanks and regards,
William
On Mar 31, 2010, at 9:25 AM, William ZHANG wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> My colleague is archiving some data by gui interface - dsmj ,
>
> how can I know the finish of this archive if I can not see the gui interface
> and he does not close gui.
The action constitutes transactions and a session, so stand
Try "q act or=client node= begint=X"
Grigori G. Solonovitch
Senior Technical Architect
Information Technology Bank of Kuwait and Middle East http://www.bkme.com
Phone: (+965) 2231-2274 Mobile: (+965) 99798073 E-Mail: g.solonovi...@bkme.com
Please consider the environment before printin
Perfect. Never noticed that parameter. Expire is running and removing..
Regards,
Shawn
Shawn Drew
Internet
john.mona...@us.logicalis.com
Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
03/30/2010 06:07 PM
Please respond to
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
ADSM-L
cc
We have a 5.4.2.0 TSM server running under mainframe Linux. We use
multiple processes for both storage pool backups and migrations.
We are seeing the following sequence of events with annoying
frequency:
1.One of the processes for a command is cancelled (usually to make
a drive available for a r
Shawn,
> I can't find the reference, but if I remember right (which is always
> suspect) Virtual Volumes are stored using an archive copy group on the
> target server, but ignores the "Retain Version" of the copy group.
I'd been hunting for confirmation of this too - here goes:
http://www-01.ibm
I'm not a Solaris type, so I need to ask...is Open Solaris the same as Solaris
x86?
Trying to find out if the Solaris x86 client will work on Open Solaris, or if
is something different altogether.
Thanks,
-Lloyd
It works.
Atleast with the 5.5 client, but I don't see any reason why 6.1+ wouldnt.
On 31/03, Lloyd Dieter wrote:
> I'm not a Solaris type, so I need to ask...is Open Solaris the same as
> Solaris x86?
>
> Trying to find out if the Solaris x86 client will work on Open Solaris, or if
> is someth
Richard van Denzel
I'm not quite sure this is the exact problem you're having that Richard Sims
is reporting here. I just ran into this same issue here when upgrading my
TSM 6.1 Windows Server to TSM 6.2. I found the answer on the following url:
See if this helps.
http://www-01.ibm.com/suppor
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Samuel Miles
Sent: dinsdag 30 maart 2010 15:06
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] unsubscribe
Chris Miles
IBM Global Services, Americas Service Delivery
Enterprise Storage Services
Chattano
I am trying to upgrade a tsm windows server and the instruction read:
Write down the directory path of your current Tivoli Storage Manager server.
How to do I get this information
why does 5.4 need to be uninstalled?
if the add/remove programs is not allowing uninstall, what are other
avenues are there to uninstall
On Wednesday 31 March 2010, you wrote:
> Richard van Denzel
>
> I'm not quite sure this is the exact problem you're having that Richard
> Sims is reporting here. I just ran into this same issue here when
> upgrading my TSM 6.1 Windows Server to TSM 6.2. I found the answer on the
> following url
Yoda, I don't want to sound condescending so please excuse me if it
does. It appears by some of the questions you're asking that you would
be GREATLY benefited by taking some time and reading at least the TSM
Redbooks, and some of the Admin guide. I would recommend the deployment
Guide Redbook, a
Hi Richard(2),
I also found this APAR, but it applies to 6.1. I followed the upgrade
steps in the 6.2 manual using the console wizard (as suggested in the
APAR).
Richard(1).
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: woe
Hi Dave,
I will give this a try tomorrow, although the console wizard did not
report a communication problem in this step.
Richard.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Dave Canan
Sent: woensdag 31 maart 2010 19:46
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARI
Hi Stef,
I'm first going to try Dave's suggestion before reinstalling and
restoring everything. It's only a demo machine, so nothing is lost and I
can do some trial and error on it.
Richard.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Stef
TSM 6.1.3.1 on Win23K 32b; TS1130 drives, onsite pool not encrypted,
offsite pool encrypted, TSM as key manager
Anybody seen this error "attempt to open volume with conflicting device
class IDs"?
I don't even know what that means! Any hints?
It happens several times a week during daily
We are installing TDPSQL on a Window 2003 Standard Edition (x64) Server. The
database is SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition 64 Bit. The setup CD for the
TDPSQL client is version 5.3.4. How do you determine whether we should install
the Win 64 version of TDPSQL or the X64 version. Also, could s
I think you can't install the wrong version.
For the standard BA client, it gives pop-up message and exits if you try
to install 32 bit client on 64 bit OS and vice versa.
David Longo
>>> gailshusband 3/31/2010 4:42 PM >>>
We are installing TDPSQL on a Window 2003 Standard Edition (x64) Server.
On 31 mrt 2010, at 22:42, gailshusband wrote:
> We are installing TDPSQL on a Window 2003 Standard Edition (x64) Server. The
> database is SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition 64 Bit. The setup CD for the
> TDPSQL client is version 5.3.4. How do you determine whether we should
> install the Win
I would recommend getting the latest Data Protection for SQL code.
That would be Data Protection for SQL 5.5.3.
You should install the x64 version.
Thanks,
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 03/31/2010
04:42:35 PM:
> [image removed]
>
Hi,
For installation path, see this registry key :
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\IBM\ADSM\CurrentVersion\Server\Path
The subfolder /server is automaticcaly added to the installation path
you choose in the installation wizard.
--
Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي
Erwann SIMON
Le 31/03/201
You can think of open solaris relates to solaris as fedora is to red hat Linux.
It is a test bed for the future releases of solaris. Open Solaris is both x86
and sparc.
Last year they were saying that most of a release of open solaris this year
would become solaris 11. I am not sure if this roa
Try this:
select date(start_time) as start_date, time(start_time) as start_time,
date(end_time) as end_date, time(end_time) as end_time, SUBSTR (CAST(entity AS
char(17)),1,17) as Node_Name, cast((Bytes/1024) as decimal(15,2)) as
KB_Archived, affected, (end_time-start_time)minutes as Mins from
That's great! I have tested and got the infor about archived status.
Thank you very much!
Best Regards,
william
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Patel, Ankur
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 10:55 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subje
Dear All,
I meet problem again, found one session 73078 try to open and close volume
000449L3 again and again from yesterday morning to yesterday evening.
Does anyone know the reason or help me analyse it?
-
29 matches
Mail list logo
