Hi TSM-ers!
Today I came in the office and customers complained about failing
backups. I checked the TSM server and noticed that the diskpool was
full. Migration was running, but only two processes at the same time. A
migration starts, migrates a file an then completes successfully,
another one sta
Do you have a high and low migration threshold set?
Eric Vaughn
Technical Administrator
Stevenson University
Office (443)334-2301
evau...@stevenson.edu
>>> "Loon, EJ van - SPLXM" 10/2/2009 8:33 AM >>>
Hi TSM-ers!
Today I came in the office and customers complained about failing
backups. I che
Join the club. I am beginning to wonder if anyone is successfully using
V6.1, trouble-free.
Monday I decided to put my 6.1.2 server into production and am wondering
if this was a really bad decision.
I have had to bounce it 5-times due to it simply hanging/going
non-responsive eventhough the onl
Hi Eric!
Yes! Here are all settings for the storagepool:
Storage Pool Name: DISKPOOL_LBU3_1
Storage Pool Type: Primary
Device Class Name: DISK
Estimated Capacity: 983 G
Space Trigger Util: 12.9
Pct Util: 12.8
Pct Migr: 12.6
Pct Logical: 100.0
High Mig Pct: 5
Low Mig Pct: 0
Migration Delay: 0
Migra
The diskpool was full, but high migration is 5%.
A low highmig threshold could easily start off migrations that run just
one file then quit, especially if there are large files...but how did
you fill the disk pool with such a low percentage for the high mig
threshold?
-Original Message-
F
Are real experiences with DB sizing out of line with what is
recommended for per-object estimating?
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tsminfo/v6/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.itsm.srv.install.doc/t_srv_inst_db_space.html
We want also to go into production with 6.1.2. All setup is finished.
But with about 20 nodes (all export/import) we continously have trouble with
full active log and full archivelog.
Our active log size is 16Gbyte and it seems to be enough for this small setup.
But sometimes the log usage explo
Good luck with the PMR. Let us know how it works out.
As I understand it, currently this is WAD (requiring 2+ full backups and
corresponding volhist backups before clearing the archivelog).
It is also my understanding (from my last conversation with an L2 tech at
IBM) that they know this i
Hi!
This setting has always been this way and always did what it was
supposed to do: we do want data to go to (virtual) tape a.s.a.p. But now
the diskpool is filled more quickly than the migration empties it,
because there are just two migrations running and they keep on finishing
after just migrat
Have you ever considered increasing the high threshold? IIRC TSM won't
start new automig processes when migration is already running, and
will only start as many processes as there are different clients
having data in your pool. Also, check out your mountlimit on the tape
devclass.
Furthermor
I've been watching this discussion with great interest, and more than a
little fear.
We are going to implement the v6 ISC/SC shortly on a standalone Win server,
but we aren't planning to upgrade the TSM servers until next year. A BIG
thanks to all you bleeding edge types out there
IBM has a
That last paragraph made my head hurt! I had the "opportunity" to take a
database class in college. Didn't want to know it then, don't want to know it
now.
I recall one of the design centers for the DB2 thing was to ensure that a TSM
admin didn't need to become a DB2 admin. I don't even know
Seem's to me I'm hit by IC63373 -despit eit should be fixed in 6.1.2.
Will change the value and report results next week.
Regards
Stefan Holzwarth
ERROR DESCRIPTION:
If in the Tivoli Storage Manager server options file dsmserv.opt
the size of the a
13 matches
Mail list logo
