Re: V6.1.2.0 server has arrived

2009-08-13 Thread Grigori Solonovitch
Thank you very much for information. I have upgraded our test server from TSM 6.1.1 to TSM 6.1.2 successfully. I have created scripts by scripts.smp as well. I do not think that everything is fine in 6.1.2. I couldn't explain next error message: =

Netware Client Backup Ver 551

2009-08-13 Thread Ramiro Ruiz
Hello, I have been trying to backup a directory using a specific Management class, I have other server that works just fine in the same Domain policy using other Management class. For some unknown reason the INCLUDE statements on the dsm.opt don't get read? I can do a manual backup no problem, a

Re: Netware Client Backup Ver 551

2009-08-13 Thread Huebschman, George J.
If this is the directory to which you are trying to apply the mgmt class: INCLUDE DATA1:\...\* E4LCLASS It seems to be excluded in the domain statement: DOMAIN ALL-LOCAL -_ADMIN: -SYS: -DATA1: NDS: -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf O

Re: db availability for DR

2009-08-13 Thread Keith Arbogast
Geoff, We have server to server communications between two TSM servers in data centers about 60 miles apart. A db backup is written to a virtual volume at the distant data center. That has eliminated moving cartridges by courier. There is a private 10 Gb link between the servers. The server

Re: Netware Client Backup Ver 551

2009-08-13 Thread Huebschman, George J.
Ramiro, Have you tried "q inclexcl" to see what the client thinks it should be doing? George Huebschman -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Ramiro Ruiz Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 8:35 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject

Re: db availability for DR

2009-08-13 Thread Wanda Prather
I've forgotten what hardware platform you have, so modify the suggestions based on what you have available; I have different customers using different means; several things work. Just remember to TEST the results at your DR site. And now matter what your method, it's going to depend on having th

Re: TSM for Windows 2008 CLuster

2009-08-13 Thread Wanda Prather
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg27016259 There is a link to download the .ppt and a link to replay the audio/vido. W On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Yudi Darmadi wrote: > Dear TSM'ers > > I want to set up a TSM Scheduler Service for TDP Exchange in a cluster, it > seems that

Re: Netware Client Backup Ver 551

2009-08-13 Thread Ramiro Ruiz
Hi There, I did tried that and it shows: Include all ssmd\data1:/.../* Include all ssmd\sys:/system/autoexec.ncg >>> From: "Huebschman, George J." To: Date: 8/13/2009 8:59 AM Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Netware Client Backup Ver 551 Ramiro, Have you tried "q inclexcl" to see what the client thi

Re: TSM for Windows 2008 CLuster

2009-08-13 Thread Ochs, Duane
We ran into similar issues in 2003, we ended up putting the opt files on the c drives. It can be a pain point if the opt files are modified and not copied to each member of the cluster, but it prevents resources from dropping when a the disk with the opt file or TSM install was removed or taken

Re: Netware Client Backup Ver 551

2009-08-13 Thread Ramiro Ruiz
No problem :) every time I change the dsm.opt I restart the scheduler. I also tried domain all-local data: and it backs up the whole volume excluding the directories from the exclude.dir statements, the problem is that it doesn't use the management class that I want(to tape vs disk). So it appea

Re: Netware Client Backup Ver 551

2009-08-13 Thread Ramiro Ruiz
Sorry, read the other email first. I have other server with this options, and it works just fine: DOMAIN ALL-LOCAL -NDS -_ADMIN: -SYS: -DATA1: -SCRATCH: -RESEARCH1: -RESEARCH3: -RESEARCH3: INCLUDE RSEARCH1:\...\* fom2class INCLUDE RSEARCH2:\...\* fom2class INCLUDE RSEARCH3:\...\* fom2class

Re: Netware Client Backup Ver 551

2009-08-13 Thread Huebschman, George J.
I had thought that something excluded in the domain would preempt any other include/exclude processing. You could try removing the Domain Statement exclude for -DATA1:. I apologize for asking the basic stuff, but have you restarted your scheduler since you changed the opt file? George H -Orig

Re: Sharing 3494

2009-08-13 Thread Francisco Molero
Hi Sam, it exists two ways to share 3494. One of them is using TSM Library Sharing. One TSM is the master and the others are Client. In this case, all TSMs share the same category in the definition because you only define one library from TSM Master,but I don't recomended that. Second way is

Virtual Volume assistance

2009-08-13 Thread Shawn Drew
We started using Virtual Volumes earlier this year for some new branch locations with no local, long-term storage. As it works, multiple virtual volumes will get stacked into one "real" sequential volume. The problem is that periodically, a reclamation process will require two volumes that happen

Re: Virtual Volume assistance

2009-08-13 Thread Strand, Neil B.
Shawn, In your virtual volume devclass definition you might try to set a maxsize equal to that of the real storage behind it. This should prevent stacking. Neil Strand Storage Engineer - Legg Mason Baltimore, MD. (410) 580-7491 Whatever you can do or believe you can, begin it. Boldness has g

Re: Virtual Volume assistance

2009-08-13 Thread Shawn Drew
TSM 5.5.3 For some reason, it seems to ignore the maxsize setting. I've set the devclass to 50G, but the volumes seem to randomly choose when they are full. Collocation is disabled. Here is an excerpt from a q vol. Strange. TSM-WB_LM.BFS.250165435 VV_VTL_C1 WBVV-DEVC 22.6 G

disablenqr option

2009-08-13 Thread Moyer, Joni M
Hi everyone, I found the following statement in an options file and was wondering if it was even valid any longer. It was in a Windows 2003 client that has a TSM 5.5.0.0 client. TESTFLAG DISABLENQR I know that for the current Windows TSM 5.5 client it appears that you would have to have disa

Re: disablenqr option

2009-08-13 Thread Tchuise, Bertaut
Hey Joni, The "testflag disablenqr" has now been replaced with "disable nqr no/yes". The "testflag disablenqr" does nothing (see link below). http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21319732 BERTAUT TCHUISE Storage Support Administrator Legg Mason Technology Services *410-580-7032 btchu

Re: Virtual Volume assistance

2009-08-13 Thread Thomas Denier
-Shawn Drew wrote: - >TSM 5.5.3 > >For some reason, it seems to ignore the maxsize setting. I've set >the devclass to 50G, but the volumes seem to randomly choose when >they are full. Collocation is disabled. Here is an excerpt from >a q vol. Strange. > >[Excerpt deleted] If I remember

Change backup copy group settings

2009-08-13 Thread James Choate
I changed my backup copy group setting for a Policy domain that has one test node in it from Versions Data Exists: 35 Versions Data Deleted: 35 Retain Extra Versions: 35 Retain Only Version: 60 To: Versions Data Exists: 7 Versions Data Deleted: 7 Retain Extra Versions: 7 Retain Only Version: 14

Re: Change backup copy group settings

2009-08-13 Thread km
On 13/08, James Choate wrote: > I changed my backup copy group setting for a Policy domain that has one test > node in it from > > Versions Data Exists: 35 > Versions Data Deleted: 35 > Retain Extra Versions: 35 > Retain Only Version: 60 > > To: > Versions Data Exists: 7 > Versions Data Deleted: 7

Re: db availability for DR

2009-08-13 Thread Steven Harris
Geoff Here's a slightly off-the-wall and untested idea.Since most of your database remains the same from day to day it is wasteful to copy it all every time. Take a database snapshot daily to a file volume. Copy or rename this so that the current version always has the same name. Run rsync

DSMCAD and intentionally random start times

2009-08-13 Thread Nick Laflamme
A colleague solemnly assures me that clients who use DSMCAD to manage their schedule activities don't see any randomization in their schedule start times. Now, on the one hand, I have so little experience with DMSCAD, who am I to argue with someone who claims to have experience? On the other hand,