Hi all, a few questions for you.
When upgrading from TSM 5.4 to 5.5 (on Solaris 9), do I need to:-
uninstall/reinstall the TIVsmSlic package?
delete or rename the nodelock file?
As I use disaster recovery manager I assume I just have to register tsmee.lic?
Do I not have to register a specific
Sorry if this is a silly question, but is it wise in terms of security
to force Java 1.4 to be run? Although I see it was updated too in this
latest fix, its use is deprecated.
In our case, there are users whose machines we never see, and I'm
worried that if we got them to move to 1.4 then they
Maybe the classic client encryption could solve this. Then only the customer
would be able to access the data and there would be no need for scrubbing.
On 20/06, Guenther Bergmann wrote:
> Hi *TSMlers,
>
> given the following scenario:
> - one TSM Server
> - a lot of filesystem clients (mostly AIX
This past weekend we started the process of upgrading our TSM environment
from v5.4.1 to v.5.2.2. We have 2 dedicated library managers (3584 libs)
and 7
tsm library client instances and a bunch of storage agents.
The first step was to upgrade _one_ of the library managers.
After we upgrade this l
Hi Rick,
Try using the following commands which will disable all client and
server sessions to the TSM server:
DISABLE SESSIONS CLIENT
DISABLE SESSIONS SERVER
Hope this helps!
Michael Petrullo
Storage Support Administrator
Legg Mason Technology Services
Phone: 410.580.7381
Email: mpetru...@leg
Give the library clients a bad hosts entry for the library manager. Very
little to change and change backup.
Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Petrullo, Michael G.
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 10:09 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.
I tried a DISABLE SESSIONS ALL, but it didn't work. Tape mounts (via
server-to-server, I assume) still
worked. I found this puzzling.
Rick
"Petrullo,
Michael G."
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent by: "ADSM:
Rick,
Were the tapes already mounted when you ran the command? I have used
those commands several times in the past during maintenance upgrades and
they worked flawlessly.
-Mike
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Richard Rhodes
Sen
Richard,
I think something quick and dirty would be changing the port numbers on your
library manager's dsmserv.opt file. No other client, STAgent or server would
contact this instance, and you could prep a modified dsm.sys/opt to let you
admin client work.
When finished, just return the corr
Trying to remember (it was a long night).
I disabled all tape drive before halting the LM. After it booted I logged
in and checked - alll drives were disabled. I issued "disabled sessions
all", then enabled one tape drive. By the time I typed "q mount" it came
back with a tape being mounted!!
This, and the idea of a bogus ip address on the lib clients are great
ideas!
Thanks!
Rick
Paul van Dongen
To
Sent by: "ADSM: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Dist Stor
Q&D could be to set COMMMETHOD NONE at the end of your dsmserv.opt and
run the server in the foreground to run your audit. The bogus
portnumber has the advantage of allowing you to remotely control the
server...
On 22 jun 2009, at 18:31, Richard Rhodes wrote:
I tried a DISABLE SESSIONS ALL, but
Hi all,
What is the command (s) to remove all the Linux Tivoli Client cleanly
from a server?
Pkgrm TIVsm? or rpm -e TIVsm-BA? both ?
Is there also a uninstall utility?
Thanks in advance!
The following commands were taken from the install/uninstall manual:
pkgrm TIVsmCba TIVsmCapi TIVsmCdoc
Michael Petrullo
Storage Support Administrator
Legg Mason Technology Services
Phone: 410.580.7381
Email: mpetru...@leggmason.com
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [
Hi Tim,
First, I'm surprised that you would even ask such a basic system
administration question. I'd think that the process of adding and
removing software to your system is such a basic skill that I'd only
expect this question to pop up if TSM was not installed using the OS
specific tools (clie
Remco,
I tried those but it doesn't seem to be working that's why I asked. and
others said to use some other commands such as
rm -rf /usr/adsm
tim
Remco Post wrote:
Hi Tim,
First, I'm surprised that you would even ask such a basic system
administration question. I'd think that the process o
On 22 jun 2009, at 20:40, Timothy Hughes wrote:
Remco,
I tried those but it doesn't seem to be working that's why I asked.
and
now, in that case, you have some output of rpm?
others said to use some other commands such as
rm -rf /usr/adsm
wow, /usr/adsm... I might be wrong, but wasn't L
Remco
Server was rebooted , I am removing them all manually since some of
them will have to be done that way in either case.
Tim
Remco Post wrote:
On 22 jun 2009, at 20:40, Timothy Hughes wrote:
Remco,
I tried those but it doesn't seem to be working that's why I asked.
and
now, in that
Our Windows Systems group prefers to use MS DPM for Exchange and Sharepoint
backup and recovery. If your site is doing the same, we would like to talk
with you about Best Practices for TSM backup of MS DPM and what you have
learned.
Please reply to...
--
jim.o...@yale.edu (w#203.432.6693, c#20
>> On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:02:10 -0400, Richard Rhodes
>> said:
> QUESTION: How can you effectively get a audit libr
> cmd to run in a busy library sharing environment?
Here's how I solved that problem: I wrote a script to generate a
truckload of UPDATE PATH statements.
#!/usr/local/bin/per
Hi all
I'm setting up backups of a number of MSSQL instances in a three node
cluster.
instance 1 has its opt file in s:\tsm and a sql_full.cmd file there
tailored for it
instance 2 has its opt file in t:\tsm and similarly another sql_full.cmd
file tailored for it.
instances 3 and 4 are in u: and
The old approach, was to have a scheduler process per service group.
(The scheduler was set to manual, and the clustering app starts the
scheduler when the service group starts.) Each service group would then
have a unique nodename, and you configure a unique port number on the
client as well.
Nod
Hi Guenther,
looks rather like a challenge, but doable. You certainly will have to
seperate this data from the remaining nodes in its own primary disk random
access storage pool. As I understand, all primary data stays on disk, so
while the solution does make the setup slightly more complex and al
Hi Guys,
We have a Business Partner coming to us on Friday and wanna talk about
CommVault and tell us how much better it is then TSM.
Can anyone give me some awesome questions that will kill them? Like NDMP,
Redbooks and the unique support error code that TSM has so it is much easier to
find a s
24 matches
Mail list logo
